HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Agenda Packet 2022-10-26
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Virtual Meeting
Attend Live Meeting Here: https://www.cityofpa.us/984/Live-Virtual-Meetings
October 26, 2022
6:00 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PUBLIC COMMENT
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the September 28, 2022 Regular Meeting
V. ACTION ITEMS
1. Façade Grant No. 22-03
Peninsula Housing Authority: Lee Plaza and Annex Renovation, 108 West 1st Street
2. Public Hearing: Climate Resiliency Implementation Plan
Review of the Draft Climate Resiliency Implementation Plan and recommendation to City
Council.
VI. DISCUSSION
1. Building Residential Capacity - Code Amendment Process
Discuss increasing the City’s residential building capacity in accordance with RCW
36.70A.040, culminating in a City Council decision in March of 2023. Review initial staff
suggestions in preparation for an in-depth discussion of proposed changes to the PAMC at a
subsequent meeting.
2. Continued discussion of proposed changes to Port Angeles Municipal Code Title 17
Discussion of staff memorandum providing schedule for implementing code amendments and
response to the Commission’s proposal to proceed with implementation of amendments to
Title 17 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
VII. STAFF UPDATES
VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 1 of 86
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Virtual Meeting
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
September 28, 2022 6:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Stanley opened the regular meeting at 6:02 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Tammy Dziadek, Andrew Schwab (Vice Chair), Marolee Smith,
Benjamin Stanley (Chair)
Commissioners Absent: Richie Ahuja, Colin Young - excused
City Staff Present: Ben Braudrick (Senior Planner)
Chris Cowgill (Assistant City Attorney)
Holden Fleming (Housing Coordinator)
Norman Gollub (Interim Director of Community and Economic
Development)
Mike Sanders (Fire Marshal)
Zach Trevino (Assistant Planner)
Public Present: Linda Snyder
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chair Stanley opened the meeting to public comment.
No member of the public provided comment.
Chair Stanley closed the meeting to public comment.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Vice Chair Schwab moved to approve the minutes from the September 14, 2022 regular meeting
of the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (4-0).
ACTION ITEM AND DISCUSSION ITEM #1
1. Draft Ordinance creating Port Angeles Municipal Code Section 17.96.055
Discussion of alternatives identified by staff, followed by a presentation of the draft
ordinance considered by the City Council on September 20, 2022 for Planning Commission
review yielding a recommendation to City Council.
Planner Fleming introduced the item by recapitulating the series of events leading to this Planning
Commission meeting, beginning with the September 6th motion of the City Council to direct staff
to draft an ordinance enabling religious organizations to shelter individuals on-site without
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 2 of 86
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 2022
Page 2
additional restrictions beyond those necessary to ensure life, safety, and sanitation.
Following the item’s introduction, the Commission considered the following information provided
by staff:
• Planner Braudrick provided an overview of considerations related to planning and zoning
that should be taken into account during consideration of temporary housing.
• Planner Trevino provided an overview of considerations from the perspective of the
Building Division and the Public Works & Utilities Department.
• Planner Fleming provided an overview of alternative housing types through a slide
presentation outlining the pros and cons of each type. As part of this presentation, he related
the prior discussion of land use processes, building code requirements, and public works
considerations to each housing type.
• Fire Marshal Sanders provided an overview of what he looks for when reviewing a
development proposal to ensure compliance with safety standards, including those
established by the International Fire Code and the Revised Code of Washington (RCW).
• Attorney Cowgill provided an overview of the process for fulfilling the City Council
directives in light of pertinent state and local requirements.
Following staff presentations, the commission discussed the item, considering the information
provided by staff and making several suggestions prior to a motion, including the following:
• Vice Chair Schwab suggested that the City adapt the discussion that occurred when
consideration of permitting RVs was taking place to housing more generally, resulting in
an ordinance that lists basic safety criteria that must be met to establish housing. Staff noted
that the safety checklist they developed fulfills this and would act in place of a conditional
use permit application.
• Commissioner Smith stated that she does not support waiving permits and believes that
the ability of the City to pursue enforcement of violations must be maintained to ensure
health and safety.
• Chair Stanley suggested that the ordinance being considered can serve as impetus for a
broader approach to semi-permanent housing in the City.
• Vice Chair Schwab recommended that Alternative #1 be pursued, which would cause no
code changes to be made, but recommended that conditional use permit fees for religious
community centers proposing housing be waived and the safety checklist utilized. Staff
noted that the City Manager has the power to waive fees.
Further discussion of alternatives ensued, with input provided by staff in response to clarifying
questions regarding the distinction between the four alternatives and the ability of the fire code to
accommodate innovative housing developments.
Commissioner Schwab moved to recommend to the City Council Alternative 1 as identified
in the September 20, 2022 staff memorandum to City Council, with the suggestion of directing
staff to waive permit fees for religious organizations and streamline the permit review process
by utilizing a safety review checklist. The motion was seconded and passed by a roll call vote
(4-0).
Commissioner Schwab moved to recommend to City Council to direct staff to draft a
comprehensive ordinance for supportive housing based on solutions implemented in other
municipalities.
The Commission discussed this motion and potential amendments but decided to vote on the
original motion without amendment.
The motion was seconded and passed by a roll call vote (4-0).
Concern was expressed that, as a result of these motions alone, City Council may not be aware that
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 3 of 86
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 2022
Page 3
the Commission believes that one of the best solutions is to look at many different components of
temporary housing in a single ordinance. The Commission asked staff to ensure that the elements
that the Planning Commission identified in the discussion as being important to the consideration
of temporary housing in the City be clearly conveyed to the City Council. Staff confirmed their
understanding that the Commission is interested in initiating a comprehensive review of temporary
housing more generally. Staff noted that the forthcoming amendments to Title 17 PAMC could
incorporate these elements.
DISCUSSION ITEM #2
Chair Stanley moved to table Discussion Item #2 as identified on the meeting agenda until the
next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded and passed
unanimously (4-0).
STAFF UPDATES
City staff provided several updates to the Commission, as follows:
• The Washington Department of Commerce Short Course on Local Planning training has been
scheduled for all Planning Commissioners on September 29, 2022 from 6:00 – 9:00 PM.
• The City has been selected by the Washington Department of Commerce as one of the
communities to participate in the Department’s Climate Pilot Program. The program will aid
the City in integrating climate action planning and the Climate Resiliency Plan into the
Comprehensive Plan during the next update.
• Planner Braudrick attended a meeting hosted by the North Olympic Development Council,
which included many federal and state agencies and was a part of the regional hazard mitigation
planning approach. The meeting yielded information on funding opportunities for climate
resiliency actions and how the stakeholders on the Olympic Peninsula can work together on a
comprehensive approach to hazard mitigation and climate adaptation.
• The regular meeting of October 12th is cancelled because staff is attending the Annual WA-
APA Conference, so the next regular meeting will be held on October 26th.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
• Vice Chair Schwab asked about the progress of the Lee Plaza improvement project,
stating that he would recuse himself from any consideration of Lee Plaza by the
Commission. Staff confirmed that a façade grant application has been submitted.
• Chair Stanley expressed concern about the many four-way intersections in the City that
do not have stop or yield signs. Staff agreed that this concern could be discussed at a future
meeting, at which the City Engineer could provide further information.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Stanley moved to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded and passed
unanimously (4-0).
The meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 4 of 86
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 2022
Page 4
Zach Trevino, Secretary Ben Stanley, Chair
MINUTES PREPARED BY: Zach Trevino, Secretary
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 5 of 86
Action Item #1
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 6 of 86
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Ben Braudrick, Assistant Planner
MEETING DATE: October 26, 2022
RE: Façade Grant Application for Business (Grant No. 22-03)
APPLICANT: Public Plaza, LLLP, 2603 South Francis Street
OWNER: Peninsula Housing Authority, 2603 South Francis Street
LOCATION: Lee Plaza and Lee Annex, 108-120 West 1st Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the facade grant award amount of $20,000 toward the
creation of a more cohesive look between the Lee Plaza and Annex buildings located at 108-120
West 1st Street (Grant No. 22-03).
PROJECT SUMMARY
Public Plaza, Limited Liability Limited Partnership (LLLP) is requesting funding for the creation of
a more cohesive look of the 2 buildings, Lee Plaza and Lee Annex by extending the stucco overlay
at the east above the storefront windows to the west, creating columns that match for the full
street frontage and provide a new paint scheme that extends for the width of both buildings. In
addition, new base tile will run fully across the front façade. The primary entrance will be
accentuated with new Art Deco tiling and period lighting. New building signage is proposed as
well but not part of this grant. of the building located at 108-120 W 1st Street (Grant No. 22-03).
The applicant is requesting these funds as part of a larger effort to update the exterior and
interior of the buildings. A more in-depth description of the proposed work and its intended
outcome can be found in “Attachment A” to this document. The desired end result of this
proposal is to unify the buildings, accentuate the Art Deco style and provide for more durable
materials.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The Community Façade and Sign Improvement Program was authorized by the City Council
through the passing of ordinance #3476. This authorization is represented in Chapter 2.80 of the
Port Angeles Municipal Code. The Program will provide a grant for funding of façade
improvements that will enhance the physical appearance, accessibility, and overall value of
individual buildings as well as the surrounding downtown area. In evaluating proposals for
funding, Staff reviewed the “Evaluation criteria and prioritization” of Section 2.80.110:
1.Private contribution over and above the required match;
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 7 of 86
Lee Plaza and Annex at 108-120 West 1st Street, No. 22-03 October 26, 2022 Page 2
Staff Analysis: Per the submitted budget, the applicant is providing the required 50 percent
match. The project is not located in the designated redevelopment area along 1st Street between
Laurel and Race Streets allowing for a request of greater than $10,000. Instead, staff is
evaluating the façade update cumulatively as five separate commercial units on the first story of
the two buildings being done simultaneously. The total request of $20,000 is being done as a
collaborative effort by the building owner to update each of these 5 units uniformly instead of
potentially requesting five independent $4,000 grants or two separate $10,000 grants for each
building. The exterior work by the applicant is currently underway. But, the large undertaking will
allow reimbursement request for work done after the Planning Commission decision date of
October 26, 2022.
2. Present condition of existing façade:
Staff Analysis: As seen in Figure 1, the existing façade is in a state of non-uniformity and is aging.
The goal of the project is to tastefully update the design details and connect the two buildings
through those common design detail. Ultimately, the applicant demonstrates an understanding
of the cultural and historic significance of the structure and is maintaining the art deco style. The
proposed changes will assist in unifying the public space along the 1st Street corridor between
Laurel and Oak Streets.
Figure 1: Current Structure–North Elevation (The red line delineates the two buildings to be unified by design)
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 8 of 86
Lee Plaza and Annex at 108-120 West 1st Street, No. 22-03 October 26, 2022 Page 3
3. The buildings overall public visibility;
Staff Analysis: The building is highly visible along the 1st Street corridor.
4. Expected increase in assessed value of improvement;
Staff Analysis: The improvements to the structure are extensive in order to accommodate for the
change in use and will undoubtedly increase the assessed value of the structure.
5. Historic Preservation;
Staff Analysis: City records for the structures date back to their construction in 1927 and 1930.
The application narrative describes the work that has previously gone into the restoration of this
building since 1999. Attachment B to this memo provides an excerpt of the Downtown Port
Angeles Historic Inventory Survey Report of April 2000.
Although not on the historic register, the changes being proposed to the structure are intended to
keep with historic preservation practices/not significant enough to be a future detriment to the
historic character of the original structure/affecting elements of the structure that will not be
adverse to future historic designation.
6. Context in the block or neighborhood;
Staff Analysis: The size and scale of these two buildings creates a great deal of prominence along
this downtown corridor. The Lee Plaza and Annex are known as two of the most important and
significant structures in the downtown area.
Benefit partner projects on same block;
Staff Analysis: Façade Grants have been approved for 11 different businesses and buildings within
a one block radius of the Lee Plaza and Annex
Figure 2: Proposed Changes– North Elevation (Further material details can be found in Attachment A)
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 9 of 86
Lee Plaza and Annex at 108-120 West 1st Street, No. 22-03 October 26, 2022 Page 4
FINDINGS, CONDITIONS & CONCLUSIONS
Staff determines the following findings based on Staff’s review of the Program’s criteria:
Findings
1. The Façade Grant (Application No. 22-03) was submitted by Peninsula Housing Authority
to the Department of Community and Economic Development on September 1, 2022.
2. The location of the work proposed is 108-120 West 1st Street.
3. The project site is located within the CBD, Central Business District zone.
4. The grant request includes the update and unification of the two building facades,
including:
a. Create horizontal unity between the main building and the adjacent building on
the right.
b. Make tan section continue to the right of the building.
c. Add columns to the building on the right.
d. Continue gray accents toward the top of the building façade to match the
adjacent building.
e. Update tan, mustard and eggplant colors on the front of the building to match
new chosen tile.
f. Extend horizontal elements to the building addition. Change colors to match new
Figure 3: Proposed Changes--– Design Details
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 10 of 86
Lee Plaza and Annex at 108-120 West 1st Street, No. 22-03 October 26, 2022 Page 5
tile.
g. Change base tile color and main entry façade to match new tile.
5. The application was reviewed by Planning Division Staff under the Façade and Sign Grant
Program criteria, as included in Chapter 2.80 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
6. The applicant is requesting $20,000.00 toward façade improvements valued no more
than $129,145.67.
7. The request will be heard by the Planning Commission at the regularly scheduled meeting
of October 26, 2022.
Conclusions
Based on the findings above, Staff makes the following conclusions:
1. Grant Application No. 22-03 is found to provide for façade improvements that will
enhance the physical appearance and overall value of the 1st Street corridor.
2. Grant Application No. 22-03 is found to meet the grant program’s criteria as included in
Section 2.80.110 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
3. Therefore, Staff is recommending support of approval of the grant proposal with
conditions of approval that outlines the requirements of the final award of funding.
Conditions
Based on Staff’s finding and conclusions, the following conditions are placed on this grant
application approval:
1. Upon the date the Planning Commission’s approval, the applicant may proceed with the
expenditures detailed in the application.
2. The applicant shall sign a grant contract with the City of Port Angeles for the
reimbursement of a maximum amount of $20,000.00 for façade improvements. The
applicant will be given 180 days to submit reimbursement of expenditures associated
with the approved grant proposal as of the Planning Commission action. If progress on
the project can be demonstrated, the applicant may request one 180-day extension of
the contract.
3. Prior to contract signature, signed letters from the proposal’s property owners granting
consent to the mural work on their property shall be provided to the Planning Division.
The letters should indicate the acceptance of the 5-year requirement to preserve the
grant work (Per standard contract language).
4. The applicant shall submit invoices for total reimbursement with a coversheet detailing
each invoice number, amount, and type of payment and not exceeding the awarded
grant amount. Reimbursement by the City will occur within 30 days of submission.
5. Prior to reimbursement, the property must be available to Staff for a site visit on the
property confirming the work was done according to the approved grant application.
6. A building permit shall be required and submitted to the Department of Community &
Economic Development for any and all construction work beyond repair.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 11 of 86
Lee Plaza and Annex at 108-120 West 1st Street, No. 22-03 October 26, 2022 Page 6
7. Any labor performed in association with the grant proposal over $2,000.00 must meet
federal prevailing wage standards.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Application materials
B. Historic Inventory Information
C. Draft Contract
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 12 of 86
FSG
FACADE &IGN GRANT
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
:i I! i:. l.trjr l"ii.i q':l !)rri1 'r',)|ji'i.:i; 't1,l ii1i,:','
r|ril.,1 i : i 7('(i I it'.',i'..i il'rrll ir,r {r: ! rtrir.t.irli\rr''iiii:r.!!:.
An application will NOT be considered complete until all element have
been completed in the following checklist.
Check all that apply:
V Application Form
A Project Narrative explaining need for improvement and what is being
improved.
V Project Budget Details:
fl Cover page including:
[l lnOividual Elements (Windows, Paint, Facia, etc.)
I S"p"rating Labor and Materials
@rctal Project Cost without Tax
Z Contractor Estimates
A Before Cotor Photograph or rendering of each proposed building
fagade improvement.
V After Renderings with all work completed
! Any engineering documents involved in project (lf Applicable)
Page 5
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 13 of 86
:i
i'Ds-*#k;w
,:.
H-if 'trr
FSG
D SIGN RAN
' i ,'lit ili:,'l;l 1\' . ,l'lllt :, l :,!' ; ;,i,''.,,i, i:,,,.tq.i,i, rii:..:l
i .rr rjr ' . jl, ,"
Applicant Name Public Plaza LLLP 2603 S Francis St
Port Angeles, WA
Mailing Address:
Contact Name (or SAM Annie O'Rourke
Contact Phone Numbe 360-452-7631 x301 EmailAddress aorou rke@peninsu lapha.org
Property Owner Name Peninsula Housing Authority Address: 2603 S Francis StMailing
Property Owner Phone Number:360-452-7631 Port Angeles ,WA
V l, the Contact, have read the Facade and Sign Grant lnformation and Award Cover Sheet Handout and
understand both the grant award process and required application materials for submission approval.
Business Nam various - see attached Business Address various - see attached
Business Type/Description miscel laneous com merical
lmprovement Type
d FacadeGrant
n Sign Grant
Start Date: 911912022
Brief Project Description
End Date 11111t2022
project 66s1 $141 ,985'73 Totat Funding requested $20,000
(Facade: not to exceed 10k and Sign: not to exceed 1k)
The owner(s) of the above properly is fully aware and agree to all proposed improvements described in grant
application. Applicant must have any changes to project proposal approved by property owner(s)
Applicant's Signatu Date 811912022
Oreate horizontal unity between the main building and building to the west
Update the current color scheme at the first floor with new tiles and paint
Emphasize the Art Deco theme consistent with the era of the building
\dd new facade lighting, column enhancements and specialized tile detailing
Property Owner's Signature <9-t Date 8119t2022
Page 6
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 14 of 86
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY BARRIER FREE
Peninsula Housing Authority
Serving Clallam and Jefferson Counties
2603 S. Francis Street, Port Angeles WA 98362
(360) 452-7631 Ext • (360) 452-9468 Fax
Narrative for Lee Plaza Façade Grant
Project Name: Lee Plaza
Address: 112 W 1st Street Port Angeles, WA 98362
Two structures formerly known as the Lee Hotel and Lee Annex were constructed in the
late 1920’s. They fell into dereliction by the early 1990’s at which point the Peninsula
Housing Authority saw an opportunity to renovate both structures into a mixed-use
building with affordable housing units on the top 3 floors and commercial retail space on
the ground floor. In 1999 the building was repurposed and rehabilitation funded through
the Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) program. While the building is not listed
on the National Register of Historic Places, it is an architecturally significant structure
downtown – one that deserves renewed attention.
The 4 story elevatored building contains 48 units of affordable housing and 5/6 units of
commercial tenant space. During the renovation of the building in 1999, work was done
to the exterior façade that included maintenance of the brick veneer, new dark metal
windows to retain the historical nature of the building, and new storefront windows and
doors. There was little attempt, given the funding shortfall, to make the buildings more
unified and enhance the Art Deco feel of the original façade.
Through a recent re-syndication of the LIHTC project, the Lee Plaza is getting a facelift
both interior and exterior. The subject of this grant request focuses on the first floor of
commercial space. We will create a more cohesive look of the 2 buildings by extending
the stucco overlay at the east above the storefront windows to the west, creating
columns that match for the full street frontage and provide a new paint scheme that
extends for the width of both buildings. In addition, new base tile will run fully across the
front façade. The primary entrance will be accentuated with new Art Deco tiling and
period lighting. New building signage is proposed as well but not part of this grant.
While the change is not dramatic, it unifies the buildings, accentuates the Art Deco style
and provides for more durable materials. The 100-year old brick veneer at the west
building will be protected by the stucco overlay further extending the life of the exterior
wall covering at the first floor. There are places of cracked and damaged tiles. By
replacing them with larger slabs of black slate, both longevity and appearance will be
improved. The renewed streetscape will convey professionalism, stability and
consistency.
Work on the first floor level will begin mid-September and finish by Thanksgiving.
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 15 of 86
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY BARRIER FREE
Peninsula Housing Authority
Serving Clallam and Jefferson Counties
2603 S. Francis Street, Port Angeles WA 98362
(360) 452-7631 Ext *841 • (360) 452-9468 Fax
Lee Plaza Commercial Tenants
MOSS 120 W 1st Street Port Angeles Clothing
The Great Northern Coffee Bar 118 W 1st Street Port Angeles Coffee
Anime Kat 114 W 1st Street Port Angeles Gaming
ONYX Sweat Society 110 W 1st Street Port Angeles Fitness
Northwest Fudge and Confections 108 W 1st Street Port Angeles Candy
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 16 of 86
8/9/2022
Lee Plaza Façade Upgrade ‐ Project Budget Details
112 West 1st Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362
Project Summary by Project Trade excluding WSST
General Items Tile Stucco Paint Electrical Grand Total
6,522.26$ 48,018.21$ 62,466.27$ 9,781.82$ 2,357.11$ 129,145.67$
Project Summary by Labor, Materials & Equipment excluding WSST
Labor Materials Equipment Grand Total
89,739.30$ 38,871.96$ 534.40$ 129,145.67$
Contractor Proposal on next Page
BELFOR PROPERTY RESTORATION
4320 South 131st Place, Suite #100, Seattle, WA 98168 800.775.8006 ph: 206.632.0800 fax: 206.547.0800
License BELLFOUG990BJ www.belforusa.com
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 17 of 86
DATE: 8/8/2022 FACILITY: Lee PlazaFUNDING: New MoneyDescription of ChangeQuantityRateSubtotalLABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT3,750.00 sf0.65$ 2,437.50$ 2,071.88$ 365.63$ 44.00 ea75.00$ 3,300.00$ 3,300.00$ 1.00 ea350.00$ 350.00$ 210.00$ 140.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT406.12 sf 14.75$ 5,990.27$ 5,990.27$ 406.12 sf2.65$ 1,076.22$ 753.35$ 322.87$ 9.00 bags30.94$ 278.46$ 278.46$ 358.00 linft 3.76$ 1,346.08$ 1,346.08$ 467.03 sf8.09$ 3,778.27$ 3,778.27$ 406.12 sf24.00$ 9,746.88$ 9,746.88$ 12.00 bags30.44$ 365.28$ 365.28$ 406.12 sf5.50$ 2,233.66$ 1,563.56$ 670.10$ 406.12 sf0.80$ 324.90$ 227.43$ 97.47$ 125.00 linft 1.80$ 225.00$ 157.50$ 67.50$ 360.00 linft 3.25$ 1,170.00$ 819.00$ 351.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT62.27 sf 14.75$ 918.48$ 918.48$ 62.27 sf2.65$ 165.02$ 115.51$ 49.50$ 2.00 bags30.94$ 61.88$ 61.88$ 56.32 linft3.76$ 211.76$ 211.76$ 20.70 sf11.20$ 231.84$ 231.84$ 28.87 sf88.94$ 2,567.70$ 2,567.70$ 19.16 sf 8.09$ 155.00$ 155.00$ 62.27 sf24.00$ 1,494.48$ 1,494.48$ 2.00 bags30.44$ 60.88$ 60.88$ 62.27 sf5.50$ 342.49$ 239.74$ 102.75$ 62.27 sf0.80$ 49.82$ 34.87$ 14.94$ 19.16 linft1.80$ 34.49$ 24.14$ 10.35$ 60.00 linft3.25$ 195.00$ 136.50$ 58.50$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT400.00 sf 1.25$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 400.00 ea 4.00$ 1,600.00$ 1,120.00$ 480.00$ 400.00 sf 1.05$ 420.00$ 294.00$ 126.00$ 400.00 sf 2.78$ 1,112.00$ 778.40$ 333.60$ Minor patch and repair to existing header, wrap and trim. Prime header area completePaint header bodyLabor to install grout and wash down tile faces Install sealer on new tile. Install fillet joint caulk from tile to exsiting aluminum framePrep/prime and paint three sided border around primary opening (against columns and Header Updates ‐ Four Existing Locations with no profile changesPrep wall surfacesProvide schluter profile for outside corner at sill and vertical corners ‐ material onlyProvide chosen fluted tile ‐ includes waste component for cuts ‐ material onlyProvide chosen art deco tile ‐ includes waste component for cuts ‐ material onlyProvide Value Engineered 18"x36" black slate base tile ‐ includes waste ‐ for use on window ledge cap ‐ material onlyLabor installation for the preceeding schluter strip, thinset and tile. Provide sanded grout in chosen color ‐25lb bag ‐ material only (35 sqft/bg) ‐ round up bagsInstall fillet joint caulk from tile to exsiting aluminum framePrep/prime and paint three sided border around primary opening (against columns and Wainscot Update ‐ Grand Entrance ‐ one bayDemolition of wainscot tile along base of wall storefronts and sill adjacent to windowsPrep wall surface and apply pre‐tile fluid applied waterproofing at substrateProvide Large Format Tile Mortar ‐ 50lb bag ‐ material only (45sf/bg) ‐ round up bagsProvide schluter profile for outside corner at sill and vertical corners ‐ material onlyProvide Value Engineered 18"x36" black slate base tile ‐ includes waste component for cuts ‐ Labor installation for the preceeding schluter strip, thinset and tile. Provide sanded grout in chosen color ‐25lb bag ‐ material only (35 sqft/bg)Labor to install grout and wash down tile faces Install sealer on new tile. Twice daily inspection and clean up of area to ensure safety and environmental measures are met. Provide required signage, caution tape and cones when working at street level below the pedestrian canopyWainscot Update ‐ General locations ‐ six commercial baysDemolition of wainscot tile along base of wall storefronts and sill adjacent to windowsPrep wall surface and apply pre‐tile fluid applied waterproofing at substrateProvide Large Format Tile Mortar ‐ 50lb bag ‐ material only (45sf/bg) ‐ round up bagsPHA ‐ Public PlazaLee Plaza Façade RenovationUpgrade of the Lee Plaza façade Commercial Level per the Evolution Architecture planset and rendering elevations. Description of work General Work ItemsPressure wash prior to work (exposure of any waterproofed areas) to remove street grime to ensure good bond of newly installed productsAttachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 18 of 86
200.00 lf 3.25$ 650.00$ 455.00$ 195.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT100.00 sf 1.25$ 125.00$ 125.00$ 40.00 linft5.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 100.00 sf 19.50$ 1,950.00$ 1,365.00$ 585.00$ 20.00 linft4.85$ 97.00$ 67.90$ 29.10$ 100.00 sf 34.25$ 3,425.00$ 2,397.50$ 1,027.50$ 1.00 ea 160.00$ 160.00$ 112.00$ 48.00$ 100.00 sf 2.65$ 265.00$ 185.50$ 79.50$ 3.00 bags30.94$ 92.82$ 92.82$ 76.00 linft3.76$ 285.76$ 285.76$ 57.50 sf88.94$ 5,114.05$ 5,114.05$ 23.00 ea11.20$ 257.60$ 257.60$ 21.00 ea10.69$ 224.49$ 224.49$ 21.00 ea10.95$ 229.95$ 229.95$ 100.00 ea31.25$ 3,125.00$ 3,125.00$ 80.50 sf24.00$ 1,932.00$ 1,932.00$ 18.00 sf65.00$ 1,170.00$ 1,170.00$ 3.00 bags30.44$ 91.32$ 91.32$ 100.00 sf 5.50$ 550.00$ 385.00$ 165.00$ 100.00 sf 0.80$ 80.00$ 56.00$ 24.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT250.00 sf 1.25$ 312.50$ 312.50$ 250.00 sf 19.50$ 4,875.00$ 3,412.50$ 1,462.50$ 50.00 linft4.85$ 242.50$ 169.75$ 72.75$ 250.00 sf 34.25$ 8,562.50$ 5,993.75$ 2,568.75$ 1.00 ea160.00$ 160.00$ 112.00$ 48.00$ 120.00 linft 21.00$ 2,520.00$ 1,764.00$ 756.00$ 25.00 linft21.00$ 525.00$ 367.50$ 157.50$ 25.00 linft21.00$ 525.00$ 367.50$ 157.50$ 250.00 sf 10.60$ 2,650.00$ 1,855.00$ 795.00$ 250.00 sf 2.78$ 695.00$ 486.50$ 208.50$ 120.00 linft 3.25$ 390.00$ 273.00$ 117.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT120.00 sf 1.25$ 150.00$ 150.00$ 120.00 sf 5.00$ 600.00$ 420.00$ 180.00$ 120.00 sf 1.05$ 126.00$ 88.20$ 37.80$ 80.00 sf2.78$ 222.40$ 155.68$ 66.72$ 55.00 sf3.25$ 178.75$ 125.13$ 53.63$ 120.00 linft 0.85$ 102.00$ 102.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT68.00 sf 1.25$ 85.00$ 85.00$ 68.00 sf19.50$ 1,326.00$ 928.20$ 397.80$ 68.00 sf34.25$ 2,329.00$ 1,630.30$ 698.70$ 1.00 ea 160.00$ 160.00$ 112.00$ 48.00$ 30.00 linft16.00$ 480.00$ 336.00$ 144.00$ 2.00 ea150.00$ 300.00$ 210.00$ 90.00$ 68.00 sf10.60$ 720.80$ 504.56$ 216.24$ 40.00 sf2.78$ 111.20$ 77.84$ 33.36$ Apply foam applications to make art deco detail up columnsApply foam capitolsInstallation of acrylic finish coat in smooth finish over all new areas in preparation for colorPaint primary raised detail colorsAdditional labor for cut in of colors on both sides of the columns precast protrusionColumn Update ‐ Grand EntryPrep column surfacesMechanically fasten stucco mesh in preparation for the installation of the stucco browncoatMix, cast and trowel stucco brown coat stucco. Additional cost to remove the waste spoils to an alternate site for curing and for the cleaning of the application tools. Column Updates ‐ four locations with no profile changePrep column surfacesMinor patch and repair to existing columnPrime columns completePaint primary color up mid section Paint accent side colors Apply foam perimeter build up to create raised relief Apply foam cornice to simulate adjacent cornicesApply foam 1/2 round base trim to simulate adjacent base trimInstallation of acrylic finish coat in smooth finish over all new areas in preparation for colorPaint header bodyPaint Header trimHeader Updates ‐ Adjacent building where surface was only brick ‐ two locationsPrep wall surfacesMechanically fasten stucco mesh in preparation for the installation of the stucco browncoatSet in cap flashing that will cover stucco cast and tile dimension prior to build out. Mix, cast and trowel stucco brown coat stucco. Additional cost to remove the waste spoils to an alternate site for curing and for the cleaning of the application tools. Labor to pre‐cut and layout Large Logo offsite and deliver to site for intallation ‐ Custom cuts ‐ count is per tile, not per cut.Labor installation for the schluter strip, thinset, fluted tile and art deco tileLabor installation for the thinset and mosaic Large Logo LayupProvide sanded grout in chosen color ‐25lb bag ‐ material only (35 sqft/bg) ‐ round up bagsLabor to install grout and wash down tile faces Install sealer on new tile. Provide Large Format Tile Mortar ‐ 50lb bag ‐ material only (45sf/bg) ‐ round up bagsProvide schluter profile for transitions ‐ material onlyProvide chosen art deco tile ‐ includes waste component for cuts ‐ material onlyProvide chosen fluted tile ‐ includes waste component for cuts ‐ material onlyProvide raw materials for Large Logo Layup ‐ Black Slate ‐ materials onlyProvide raw materials for Large Logo Layup ‐ White Carrara Marble ‐ materials onlyRemoval of the exsting cornice trim and 1/2 round base as required to provide a smooth surface for the new application and design Mechanically fasten stucco mesh in preparation for the installation of the stucco browncoatSet in cap flashing that will cover stucco cast and tile dimension prior to build out. Mix, cast and trowel stucco brown coat stucco. Additional cost to remove the waste spoils to an alternate site for curing and for the cleaning of the application tools. Apply fluid applied pre‐tile waterproofing at substratePaint Header trimHeader Updates ‐ Grand Entrance ‐ one locationPrep wall surfacesAttachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 19 of 86
28.00 sf 3.25$ 91.00$ 63.70$ 27.30$ 60.00 linft0.85$ 51.00$ 51.00$ ‐$ 2.00 ea175.00$ 350.00$ 280.00$ 70.00$ 1.00 ea1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,020.00$ 180.00$ 2.00 ea224.99$ 449.98$ 449.98$ 2.00 ea100.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT120.00 sf 1.25$ 150.00$ 150.00$ 120.00 sf 19.50$ 2,340.00$ 1,638.00$ 702.00$ 120.00 sf 34.25$ 4,110.00$ 2,877.00$ 1,233.00$ 1.00 ea175.00$ 175.00$ 122.50$ 52.50$ 120.00 sf 10.60$ 1,272.00$ 890.40$ 381.60$ 3.00 ea 4,975.00$ 14,925.00$ 10,447.50$ 4,477.50$ 36.00 ea100.00$ 3,600.00$ 3,600.00$ ‐$ 81.00 sf2.78$ 225.18$ 157.63$ 67.55$ 55.00 sf3.25$ 178.75$ 125.13$ 53.63$ 120.00 linft 0.85$ 102.00$ 102.00$ LABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENT 1.00 ea(15,262.50)$ (15,262.50)$ (10,683.75)$ (4,578.75)$ ‐$ Contractor itemsLABOR MATERIALS EQUIPMENTSubtotal 105,274.40$ 73,151.90$ 31,686.88$ 435.63$ 13.80%Overhead:14,527.87$ 10,094.96$ 4,372.79$ 60.12$ Subtotal: 119,802.27$ 83,246.86$ 36,059.66$ 495.74$ 5.50%Fee6,589.12$ 4,578.58$ 1,983.28$ 27.27$ Subtotal 126,391.39$ 87,825.44$ 38,042.95$ 523.01$ _______________________________ ________________1.687%Liability Ins.:2,132.22$ 1,481.62$ 641.78$ 8.82$ BELFOR Subtotal: 128,523.61$ 89,307.05$ 38,684.73$ 531.83$ 0.484%B&O Taxes:622.05$ 432.25$ 187.23$ 2.57$ Subtotal: 129,145.67$ 89,739.30$ 38,871.96$ 534.40$ 8.80%WSST: 11,364.82$ 7,897.06$ 3,420.73$ 47.03$ Subtotal: 140,510.49$ 97,636.36$ 42,292.70$ 581.43$ 0.965%P&P Bond:1,355.93$ 942.19$ 408.12$ 5.61$ Subtotal: 141,866.41$ 98,578.55$ 42,700.82$ 587.04$ 8.80%Tax on Bond:119.32$ 82.91$ 35.91$ 0.49$ Grand Total:141,985.73$ 98,661.46$ 42,736.74$ 587.54$ Credit for budgeted values for wainscot update in the GMP ‐ lines 94‐97Paint primary raised detail colorsPaint accent side colors Additional labor for cut in of colors on both sides of art deco detailingWork that is already in GMPThe sign on top of the entry canopy is in GMPCredits against previously budgeted work from the GMP ‐ pre designMechanically fasten stucco mesh in preparation for the installation of the stucco browncoatMix, cast and trowel stucco brown coat stucco. Additional cost to remove the waste spoils to an alternate site for curing and for the cleaning Installation of acrylic finish coat in smooth finish over all new areas in preparation for colorProvide Value Engineered Foam and Stucco stone finish pieces to match protrusions on other columns ‐ Labor and MaterialLabor for mason to pin and mortar apply the precast pieces to the column faceCore drill for electrical routingElectrician ‐ Home run electrical and conduitProvision of two Kichler 14" Tremilo single sconce lightsElectrician ‐ Installation of two exterior lightsColumn Update ‐ Adjacent building ‐ three locationsPrep column surfacesPaint accent side colors Additional labor for cut in of colors on both sides of art deco detailing08/08/2022Attachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 20 of 86
Current Façade DesignMajor Design Update Ideas:•Create horizontal unity between the main building and the adjacent building on the right. •Create a more unique, updated entry design that embodies an Art Deco theme using tile.•Update tan, mustard and eggplant colors on the front of the building to match the new chosen tile.•Change base tile color and main entry façade to also match new tile.Attachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 21 of 86
Lee Plaza – Additional Existing Photos Attachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 22 of 86
Proposed New Façade Tile and Color DesignDesign Changes:•Create horizontal unity between the main building and the adjacent building on the right. •Make tan section continue to the right of the building.•Add columns to the building on the right.•Continue gray accents toward the top of the building façade to match the adjacent building.•Update tan, mustard and eggplant colors on the front of the building to match new chosen tile.•Extend horizontal elements to the building addition. Change colors to match new tile. •Change base tile color and main entry façade to match new tile.Attachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 23 of 86
Proposed New Façade Tile and Color Design Main Art Deco Tile DesignFluted Accent TileBase TileAttachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 24 of 86
Flush overlay precast column with mesh/stucco. Finish should be smooth like precast. Mask and over‐skim arch pattern per attached A‐2.04 Create foam detail for pillar’s capital – Replacing the existing capital Mesh and stucco ‐ flush out panel – ready for tile application. Mesh and stucco overlay brick masonry – flush out new “column” that we will overlay the middle with pre‐cast to match the other columns. Mesh and stucco – flush out masonry wall – ready for color coat to match other panels across the frontage. Additional rectangular build up at panel perimeter to match other panels across the frontage. Foam with finish – ready for color coat. Foam Cornice to match the adjacent building’s detail. Ready for color coat. Foam ½ round to match the adjacent building’s detail. Ready for color coat Lee Plaza – 112 West 1st Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362 Attachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 25 of 86
Pearl Gray Powder BonePeat Brown Pewter
Smoke
Pitch Black
R
Rectified
V3
Moderate Variation
Floor
Wall
CountertopBITSBITS
A charming mixture of patterns and textures that allows for unlimited creativity in design.
4 8 x 4 8 " x 9 m m
Ash Grain Steel Grain
2.25" Mosaic on
12x12"x9.5mm
12x24"x9.5mm Goove Lev/Ret 12x24"x9.5mm Muretto
12x24"x9.5mm 12x24"x9.5mm Antislip 18x36"x9.5mm
32x32"x9.5mm24x24"x9.5mm
arcsurfaces.com
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 26 of 86
12x24"x9.5mm Quad 12x24"x9.5mm Facet24x24"x9.5mm Quad 24x24"x9.5mm Facet
TRIM
3x24"x9.5mm Bullnose 3x32"x10.5mm Bullnose 3x36"x10.5mm Bullnose
3x48"x10mm Bullnose 12x24"x9.5mm Stair Tread 12x24"x20mm Step
Pearl
Gray
Peat
Brown
Pewter
Smoke
Pitch
Black
Powder
Bone Ash Grain Steel
Grain Warm Cold
12x24"x20mm Angle Right/Left
8x24"x20mm Corner Right/Left
l Stocked Item Non-Stocked Item
Pearl
Grey
Peat
Brown
Pewter
Smoke
Pitch
Black
Powder
Bone Ash Grain Steel
Grain Warm Cold
12x24"x9.5mm l l l l l
12x24"x9.5mm Antislip
18x36"x9.5mm l l l l l
24x24"x9.5mm
32x32"x9.5mm l l l
48x48"x9mm
2.25" Mosaic on 12x12"x9.5mm l l l l l
12x24"x9.5mm Goove Lev/Ret l l l l l
12x24"x9.5mm Muretto l l
12x24"x9.5mm Quad l l
24x24"x9.5mm Quad
12x24"x9.5mm Facet
24x24"x9.5mm Facet
3x24"x9.5mm Bullnose l l l l l
3x32"x9.5mm Bullnose
3x36"x9.5mm Bullnose
3x48"x11mm Bullnose
12x24"x9.5mm Stair Tread
12x24"x20mm Step
8x24"x20mm Grid Drain
12x24"x20mm L Piece
l Stocked Item Non-Stocked Item
arcsurfaces.com
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 27 of 86
Liaison by Kelly Wearstler
*Please note: variations in color, shade, surface texture and size are natural characteristics
of all our products and should be expected. Images shown are representative, but may not
indicate all variations in these characteristics.2/2021
www.annsacks.com | 1.800.278.8453
INVENTORY BLENDS
INVENTORY CONTINUED
Mulholland Small
Silver Blend
Mulholland Small
Noir Blend
Obelisque
Lilac Thassos Blend
Obelisque
Zebrino Verde Blend*
Bardiglio Blend: Bardiglio Nuvelato, Carrara, Grigio Carnico, White Thassos
Bianco Blend: Arabescato, Bardiglio Nuvelato, Calacatta Zebrino, Grigio Carnico
Blanc Blend: Arabascato, Bardiglio Nuvelato, Carrara
Charcoal Blend: Carrara, Bardiglio Nuvelato, White Thassos
Ebony Blend: Blue Limestone, Calacatta Borghini, Calacatta Zebrino
Gris Blend: Bardiglio Nuvelato, Calacatta Zebrino, Grigio Carnico
Lilac Thassos Blend: Lilac, White Thassos, Calacatta
Nero Zebrino Blend: Nero Marquina, Calacatta Zebrino
Noir Blend: Blue Limestone, Calacatta Zebrino
Silver Blend: Bardiglio Nuvelato, Carrara
Statuary Bardiglio Blend: Statuary, Bardiglio Nuvelato
Statuary Blend: Bardiglio Nuvelato, Statuary, White Thassos
Verde Blend: Arabescato, Verde
Zebrino Verde Blend: Calacatta Zebrino, Verde, Ming Green, Nero Marquina, Arabescato*
Mulholland Large
Silver Blend
Mulholland Large
Verde Blend
Mulholland Large
Noir Blend
Lafayette Small
Statuary Blend*
Lafayette Small
Gris Blend*
* = Limited to stock on hand
Mulholland Small
Noir Blend
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 28 of 86
Alina
*Please note: variations in color, shade, surface texture and size are natural characteristics of all our products and should be expected. Images shown are representative, but may not indicate all variations in these characteristics.2/2020
www.annsacks.com | 1.800.278.8453
Alina has a heavily brushed, matte finish with a black
background and distinctive white veining, giving this stone
depth and drama.
RECOMMENDED USE
• Suitable for all indoor and outdoor wall and medium-duty
flooring applications. High traffic areas may require additional
care and cleaning.
• Suitable for installation on shower walls
• Outdoor use subject to climate and method of installation—
material not affected by freeze/thaw conditions
• Please see Ann Sacks slip resistance and wet flooring
application statement to determine usage in a wet area
INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
• Install per TCNA Handbook instructions for natural stone
• Always inspect material prior to installation — installed
material cannot be accepted for return or credit
• Always lay out material prior to installation to properly
blend and balance color
• It is recommended to seal natural stone with a penetrating
sealer
• Periodic cleaning and resealing is recommended using
products formulated for natural stone
Field 16”x16” (16.000” x 16.000” x 0.472”)12”x24” (12.008” x 24.016” x 0.472”)
Slab 30”x72” (30.000” x 72.000” x 0.787”)
Material Slate
Color Black leathered background with varied white veining
Lead Time In-stock. Typical Lead Times are 1-2 weeks
(Lead Times are subject to change)
COLLECTION
16”x16” Field
shower wall freeze / thawresidential floor
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 29 of 86
Alina
*Please note: variations in color, shade, surface texture and size are natural characteristics of all our products and should be expected. Images shown are representative, but may not indicate all variations in these characteristics.2/2020
www.annsacks.com | 1.800.278.8453
12”x24”
16”x16”
Not Shown: 30”x72” Slab
Attachment A
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 30 of 86
Palisade SW 7635Iron Ore SW 7069Sommelier SW 7595FACADE UPGRADEAttachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 31 of 86
2-7/8"25-1/4"15"7-3/4"11"--5-1/2"--12"6-3/4"7"7"3-1/8"14"11-1/2"7"11-1/4"1-3/4"11-1/4"1-1/4"14"2-3/4"15"1-1/4"4-1/4"---5"------6"---Tile Layup Rough Data8 ea - Black - 25-1/4"x2-7/8" Linear4 ea - Black - 12"x12" Linear cut to "L"8 ea - White - 11-1/4"x1-1/4" Linear8 ea - White - 14"x1-1/4" Linear8 ea - Black - 15"x5-1/2" Cut to triangle4 ea - Black - 6-3/4"x12" Cut to triangle8 ea - White - 15"x2-3/4" Linear4 ea - Black - 7"x3-1/8" Linear Parallelogram 4 ea - Black - 11-1/2"x3-1/8" Lin Parallel4 ea - Black - 14"x3-1/8" Linear Parallel4 ea - White - 5"x6" teardrop32 ea - White - 1-1/4"x4-1/4" Linear4 ea - Black - 7"x7" heart tops 100 tiles - 42 sqft gross 18.06 sqft net after cutsAttachment AOctober 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 32 of 86
RI
IDENTIFICATION SECTION
Field Site No. FIW112 OAHP No _____ _ Date Recorded __ ---=2-0...,A_,.p""r'"'"i'""'I 2=0=:.;0=:.;0._
Site Name Historic __________ -=L,.,e:.:e=--=-H.:.:o""t ... e,..,_I _______________ _
Common _______ ---=L~e:.:e=--=-H=-=o:.:t~e..,__l~B:.:u~i~ldi="~n=-=g.__ ____________ _
Field Recorder _________ __,G:.e:=..:..::ra,,.,l""d,..;K.:.=.-=B:.:.·-=E=-y._,s,,,a"'mc=a,,.n!-.. ___________ _
Owne(sName ___________ H,.__,_,,o=u=-=s,..,_i~n~gwAc..:.:u~th~o:.:.:ri~ty...._ ____________ _
Address ___________ __,1'--'4=5c::3:....:S:.o=u..,th~F..,__ra=-n:.:.c.,_i,.,.s,__ ___________ _
City/State/Zip COde _______ ,_P=-o-=-'rt:...:Ac...:.:..:.ng"'"e=-l=-=e=-=s'-'--1 .:.W.:.:Ac.:-9:.;8,,_,3:e.:6::..:2=-----------
Status m Surveynnventory
0
0
0
0
0 0
National Register
State Register
Determined Eligible
Determined Not Eligible
Other (HABS, HAER, NHL)
Local Designation
Classification
District Status
0 0
District
NR
PHOTOGRAPHY
Photography Neg. No. R~ F 24A
(Roll No. & Frame No.)
View of Southeast Corner
Date 24 Nov 99
O Site O SR
Building O LR
O Structure
O INV
Contributing O Non-Contributing
m
0
O Object
District/ Thematic Nomination Name _________________________ _
DESCRIPTION SECTION
Materials & Features I Structural Types
Building Type Commerce I Trade -Domestic
Plan
Structural System
No. of Stories
'F'
Reinforced Concrete & Heavy Timber
1
Cladding (Exterior Wall Surfaces)
OLog
O Horizontal Wood Siding
O Rustic I Drop
D Clapboard
O Wood Shingle
O Board and Batten
O Vertical Board
D Asbestos I Asphalt
mertck
O Stone
O Stucco
D Terra Cotta
O Concrete I Concrete Block
O Vinyl I Aluminum Siding
O Metal (Specify)
O Other (Specify)
Roof Type
O Gable
mFlat
O Monitor
O Gambrel
0Shed
Roof Material
O Wood Shingle
O Wood Shake
O Composition
0Slate m Tar I Bullt-Up
0Tile
OHip O Pyramidal
Other (Specify)
O Metal (Specify) __
D Other (Specify) __ _
O Nol Visible
Foundation
OLog
D Post & Pier
O Stone
0Brick D Not Visible
Concrete
O Block ti8 Poured O Other (Specify)
Integrity (Include detailed description In Description of Physlcal Appearance)
Changes to plan .............................................................. .
Changes to windows ....................................................... .
Changes to original cladding ........................................... .
Changes to interior .......................................................... .
Other (Specify) Storefront
Intact
0
0 m D
0
Slight
0
0 0 0 0
Moderate m 0 0 0 0
Extensive
0 ffl 0 I
r--• W; · · on, ' me, mrr
On'1c-e of Arcnaeology_&_ff1Storic Preservatton
420 Golf Club Road SE, Lacey Post Office Box 48343
Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 407-0752
LOCATION SECTION
Address 112 West First Street .
City/Town/County/Zip Code Port Angeles. Clallam, Washington 98362
Twp 30 N Range 6 W Section 00 Y. Section Y, Y. Section ___ _
Tax No./Parcel No. 063000-003205-0000 Acreage less than one
Quadrangle or Map Name Port Angeles Quadrangle
UTM References Zone 10 Easting E 467770 Northing N5329400
Plat/Block/Lot Surv 40P30 I Block 32 I Lots 3&4
Supplemental Map(s) _____________________________ _
I
High Styles I Forms (Check one or more of the following)
O Greek Revival D Spanish Colonial Revival/Mediterranean
O Gothic Revival m Tudor Revlval
O Italianate O Craftsman I Arts & Crafts
O Second Empire O Bungalow
O Romanesque Revival O Prairie Style
O Stick Style O Art Deco I Art Modeme
O Queen Anne O Rustic Style
O Shingle Style O International Style O Colonial Revival O Northwest Style
O Beaux Arts I Neoclassical m Commercial Vernacular D Chicago I Commercial Style O Residential Vernacular
O American Foursquare D Other (Specify)
O Mission Revival
Vernacular House Types
O Gable front
O Gable front arid wing O Side Gable
O Cross gable O Pyramidal I Hipped O Other (Specify)
Field Site No.: FIW112
Attachment B
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 33 of 86
-,,. ,,
NARRA TIIJE SECTroN --_, -
Study Unit Themes (Check one or more of the following)
O AgriL1Jlture O Conseivalion O Polllies/GovernmenVlaw
\T:I.An:hltecture I Landscape A.rchitecture O Education O Rell11ion
0Arts m Entertainment I Recreation O Science & Enaineerina
~ Commerce . O Ethnic Heritage (Specify) O Social Movements I Oraanizations
I J Communications O Health I Medicine O Transoortation
O Community Planning I Development O Manufacturing / Industry O Other (Specify)
O Military O Study Unit Sub-Theme(s) (Specify)
Statement of Significance
Date of Construction 1927 Architect I Engineer I Builder __ ..=U:.,ncek,.,,.,nc::O:.,W=,n.__ __________________ _
O In the opinion of the surveyor, this properly appears !o meet the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. m In the opinion of the surveyor, this property Is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local).
\ This building was originally constructed in 1927 as the Lee Hotel by John Lehman & Leon Hopkins (who leased it from the original owner, D.E. McGilvray). The Lee Hotel was the original tenant, but
, over the years, the building has also housed a restaurant, in addition to the hotel, which in later years was renovated and renamed the Ruby Hotel. The hotel now bears its historic name "Lee Hotel."
This building was constructed during the downtown's forth phase of development which is most visible today. It was a period ofrapid commercial expansion framed by the Great War and the Great
Depression. Older wood frame buildings were being replaced by larger more substantial structures. The railroad was now a permanent feature across the waterfront where Lincoln, Laurel, and Oak
Streets reached out to expand the downtown north with an orthogonal web of docks. They seamlessly merged dry land with the numerous wharfs reaching out into the harbor. The once formidable and
restrictive blu!T across Lincoln Street had been sluiced away. First Street quickly filled up with new retail and commercial structures. This hotel building catered to the needs of the many visitors and
travelers passing through or engaged in the downtown's thriving business environment. It is the largest and most substantial structure of its type, having been built at the peak of Port Angeles
development. In 1930 an addition expanded the hotel onto 118-120 West First Street (See FIWl 18). '
It was built in what is best described as a commercial vernacular style with numerous Tudor inspired details. Through its size, form, scale and materials, as well as its relationship to its oeighbors and the
street, this structure helped to further define the downiown's historical pattern of development. The infill nature of this building's commercial storefronts facilitated modernizations with little or no
damage to the surrounding fai;ade. Similarly, over time, the signage on this building has undergone numerous transformations with dramatic impact but few lasting scars. Though somewhat modified,
modernized and adjusted over time, the significant integrity of this building demonstrates its continuing ability to provide valuable retail and residential space. It is an important resource, documenting the
history of downtown Port Angeles' development and the vernacular urban architecture of the Northwest.
Description of Physical Appearance
h This hotel building has a four story, five bay "T" shaped original mass with a much smaller four-story, five bay, "L" shaped building addition to the wesl. (See FlW 118) Both buildings cut into the
\ existing bluff to the south. Both structures have Tudor revival inspired facades and are clad in a tan brick with full street level storefronts. There are two matching windows per bay. They are small,
( nearly square, aluminum single hung windows with faux upper muntins are slightly smaller than the original masonry openings. The original storefront in fills of continuous multi-sash transoms with
large glass storefront, some with recessed entries, have been replace~ by contemporary aluminum storefronts with wider sash and no dividing frieze.
See attached Continuation Sheet for more.
Major Blbllographlc References
Histories
Clallam County Immigration Association. Port Angeles The Gateway City of the
Pacific Coast 1897. Seattle: The Shorey Bookstore, Facsimile Reproduction
1965.
Hunt, Herbert. Washjngton West of the Cascades. Chicago: Clarke Publishing
Co., 1917.
Lauridsen, G.M. The Story of Port Angeles and Clallam County Washington.
Seattle: Lowman & Hanford Company, 1937.
Martin, Paul. Port Angeles Washington: A History Volume I. Port Angeles:
Peninsula Publishing, Inc., 1983.
McCallum, John and Lorraine Wilcox Ross. Port Angeles U.S.A. Wood and
Reber, Inc., I 961.
Peppard, Kurt. "Port Angeles Guide". Seattle: Cascadia Publishing Company,
1995.
Welsh, William. A Brief History of Port Angeles. Port Angeles: Crown
Zellerbach Corp., Seventh Printing I 955.
Maps
Levy, Lewis, Compiled by. Town o[Port Angeles Washington with Additions.
Port Angeles: Lewis Levy Reel Estate Broker, I 890.
Map of Port Angeles Washington. Tacoma: N.R. Bank Nole Company, 1912.
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: 1891, 1897, 1911, 1917, 1924, 1947, 1949, 1952,
1955, and 1964.
Smith C.E., Norman R., Compiled by. Map of Port Angeles Washington. San
Francisco: Schmidt Label & Lithograph Co., 1891.
Smith, Nonnan R., Compiled by. Map of Port Angeles Washington Territory.,
1884.
Ware, Edwin, Draughtsman. Port Angeles and Suburbs (sic). Port Angeles
W.T., 1889
Ware, W.J. Compiled by. Townsite of Port Angeles and Vicinity, Port Angeles:
W.J. Ware, 1891.
Other Sources
Polk's Clallam County Classified Business Directory. Kansas City, Mo.:
R,L.Polk Co., various editions.
Port Angeles Public Libra,y: Patricia Campbell Room Venical Files
Port Angeles Public Library: Photograph Albums (including the Bert Kellogg
Photographs Collection).
Field Site No.: FIWI t2
Attachment B
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 34 of 86
--.:.--:--:Er---_____;~·
~~~=c::e,~~
,_ ··'-
)
I
I
Project
North
.. ~ ,,, Naval Lodge Elks Building·
YJ:. ' •' Constructed: 1926
National Register of Historic Places
· ' Listed: 1986
Historic Inventory Report 2000
Port Angeles, Washington
112 I 112 1h West First Street
Field Site No.: FIW112
Commerce/Trade
Site Map: 2
Attachment B
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 35 of 86
IDENTIFICATION SECTION
Field Site No. __ ..:..F..:..IW:..:...:1...:.1.:8 __ OAHP No Date Recorded __ __,2:.aOa..:...A:.1:P:.:.r,..il .... 2::.::0 ... 0'-'0'-
Site Name Historic _____ ---=L==ec:ec..:H..:..O::e.to::e,.,_1.!..A~d..,d::.!i~ti~o!.!n~B~u,._.i'-'--'ld,.,ic:..:n~g'-----------
Common ______ __,N'-'-"'o~rt~h:....:L~i~g~h~t~G~a::.!l~le,.,_ryS-------------
Field Recorder _________ ___,G""e"'r:..:a,.,l.=d:....,KC!!....::B:.:.._.E:.Jy..,s"'a"'m=a,,_n,__ ___________ _
Owner's Name. _________ -=L""in:..:..:..:k:..:le"'tt"'e"'r'-=&:..;N:..:.:.:ix"'o"'n,._,_._l,.,_n.,_,c=-------------
Address ___________ ....,1:....:1""8'-W=-=e°"st~F--=r-=o:.:.n:.:t..,S...,t""'re,<;e,cct,,__ __________ _
City/State/Zip Code, _________ _,_P_,o..,rt'-"-"A:>.n!..!::!gl!:e'-'--'le::c:s~,.._W!..!.!A"---------------
Status m Surveynnventory
0 0
0
0
0 0
National Register
State Register
Determined Eligible
Determined Not Eligible
Other (HABS, HAER. NHL)
Local Designation
PHOTOGRAPHY
Photography Neg. No. R..§.
(Roll No. & Frame No.)
View of North Elevation
Date 16 March 00
Classific.ition
District Status
Contributing O
O District O Site mJ Bulldlng
O NR O SR O LR
Non-Contributing 0
F23A
O Structure O INV
O Object
District f Thematic Nomination Name. _________________________ _
DESCRIPTION SECTION
Materials & Features I Structural Types
Building Type Commerce/Trade -Domestic
Plan Rectanular
Structural System Reinforced Concrete
No. of Stories !
Cladding (Exterior Wall Surfaces)
OLog O Horizontal Wood Siding
O Rustic I Drop
O Clapboard
O Wood Shingle
O Board and Batten
O Vertical Board
O Asbestos I Asphalt
ffl Brlck
O Stone
O Stucco
O Terra Cotta
O Concrete I Concrete Block
O Vinyl I Aluminum Siding
O Metal (Specify)
O Other (Specify)
RoofType
O Gable
fflFlat
O Monitor
OGambrel
O Shed
Roof Material
O Wood Shingle
O Wood Shake
O Composition
0Slate
ffl Tar I Built-Up
OTile
0Hip
O Pyramidal
Other (Specify)
O Metal (Specify) __ . _
O Other (Specify)
O Not Visible ---
Foundation
OLog
O Post& Pier
O Stone
O Brick
O Not Vislble
Concrete
O Block
mPoured
O Other (Specify)
Integrity (Include detailed description in Description of Physical Appearance)
Changes to plan .............................................................. .
Changes to windows ....................................................... .
Changes to original cladding ...........................................•
Changes to interior .......................................................... .
Other (Specify) Storefront
Intact
0 0 m 0
0
Slight m
0
0 0
0
Moderate
0
0
0 m 0
Extensive
0 m 0
0 m
s·-· -·Nar-•· n, r -, 1en' · ·, 1m1 .-·ad, • ' 1or _ __J !lo1___J Q..,.,,. of Arcm1eu1ogy a. nistoric t"re~servation
420 Golf Club Road SE, Lacey Post Office Box 48343
Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 407-0752
LOCATION SECTION
Address 118/120 West First Street
City/Town/County/Zip Code Port Angeles, Clallam, Washin gton 98362
Twp 30 N Range 6 W Section 00 % Section % % Section ___ _
Tax No./ParceJ No. 063000-003210-0-000 Acreage Less than one
Quadrangle or Map Name Port Angeles Quadrangle
UTM References Zone 10 Easting E 467750 Northing N5329412
Plat/Block/Lot Surv 40P30 I Block 32 / Lot 5
Supplemental Map(s), __________________ _
High Styles I Forms (Check one or more of the following)
O Greek Revival O Spanish Colonial Revival/Mediterranean
O Gothic Revival O Tudor Revival
O Italianate O Craftsman I Arts & Crafts
O Second Empire O Bungalow
O Romanesque Revival O Prairie Style
O Stick Style ffl Art Deco I Art Moderne
O Queen Anne O Rustic Style
O Shingle Style O International Style
O Colonial ReviVal O Northwest Style O Beaux Arts I Neoclassical ffl Commercial Vernacular
O Chicago I Commercial Style O Residential Vernacular
O American Foursquare O Other (Specify) O Mission Revival
Vernacular House Types
O Gable front
O Gable front and wing
OSideGable
O Cross gable
O Pyramidal I Hipped
O Other (Specify)
Field Site No.: FIW118
Attachment B
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 36 of 86
r ,. ' ' NARRATIVE SECTION
.-·· ·~
Study Unit Themes (Check one or more of the following)
D Aariculture
O Architecture / Landscaoe Architecture
0Ar1s m Commerce
O Communications
O Community Planning I Development
Statement of Significance
O Conservallon
O Education m Entertainment I RecreaUon
O Ethnic Heritage (Specify)
O Health I Medicine
O Manufacturing I Industry
O Military
Date of Construction 1930 Architect I Engineer I Builder __ ~U~n~k~n~o~w~n~-------------------
. O In the opinion of the surveyor, this properly appears to meet the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. m In the opinion of the surveyor, this property Is located In a potential historic district (National and/or local).
O Polltlcs/GovemmenVLaw
O Religion
O Science & Engineering
O Social Movements I Organi.za~ons
O Transoortatlon
O Other (Specify}
O Studv Unit Sut>-Theme(s) (SoeciM
(
This building was originally constructed in 1920 as the addition to the Lee Hotel by E. Lofthus. Over the years, the building has housed not only the Lee Hotel, but also the James Hardware Company
and Olympic Recreation. North Light Gallery and Hutchinson Jewelry currently occupy the building.
This building was constructed during the downtown's fourth phase of development, which is most visible today. It was a period of rapid commercial expansion framed by the Great War and the Great
Depression. Older wood frame buildings were being replaced by larger more substantial structures. The railroad was now a permanent feature across the waterfront where Lincoln, Laurel, and Oak
Streets reached out to expand the downtown north with an orthogonal web of docks. They seamlessly merged dry land with the numerous wharfs reaching out into the harbor. The once formidable and
restrictive bluff across Lincoln Street had been sluiced away. First Street quickly filled up with new retail and commercial structures. This addition to the Lee Hotel of 1927 (See FIWI 12) expanded the
hotel's ability to cater to the needs of the many visitors and travelers passing through or engaged in the downtown's thriving business environment. Combined. the two structures created the largest and
most substantial structure of its type. The addition came at the very crest of Port Angeles' development, with the crash of 1929.
lt was built in what is best described as a commercial vernacular style. Through its size, form, scale and materials, as well as its relationship to its neighbors and the street, this structure helped to further
define the downtown's historical pattern of development. Though somewhat modified, modernized and adjusted over time, the significant integrity of this building demonstrates its continuing ability to
provide valuable retail and commercial space. It is an important resource, documenting the history of downtown Port Angeles' development and the vernacular urban architecture of the Northwest.
Description of Physical Appearance
This four story, five bay, art deco inspired mixed-use row structure has ground floor storefronts with tall, multiple light transoms. The upper stories have one-over-one double-hung windows, the bay
{ windows being divided by piers. It has a flat roof with a parapet, stepped out from the far,:ade with the piers continuing across it and ending in multiple stepped low beehive finials.
:.:;'l
f This building was originally built as an addition to 112 First Street West. This building shares many details (See FIWl 12). Windows align, as does the main frieze above the storefronts. The bays are
"considerable narrower with a single window. The storefront is continuous across the ground floor. The sides and rear of the building are poured concrete with punched window openings.
Major Bibliographic References
Histories
Clallam County Immigration Association. Port Angeles The Gateway City of the
Pacific Coast 1897. Seattle: The Shorey Bookslore, Facsimile Reproduction
1965.
Hunt. Herbert. Washington West oflhe Cascades. Chicago: Clarke Publishing
Co., 1917.
Lauridsen, G.M. The Story of Port Angeles and Clallam County Washington.
Seatllc: Lowman & Hanford Company, 1937.
Martin, Paul. Port Angeles Washington: A History Volume I. Port Angeles:
Peninsula Publishing, Inc., I 983.
McCallum, John and Lorraine Wilcox Ross. Port Ange]es U.S.A. Wood and
Reber, Inc., 1961.
Peppard, Kurt. "Port Angeles Guide". SeaUle: Cascadia Publishing Company,
1995.
Welsh. William. A Brief History of Port Angeles. Port Angeles: Crown
Zellerbach Corp., Seventh Prinling 1955.
Maps
Levy, Lewis, Compiled by. Town of Port Angeles Washington with Additions.
Port Angeles: Lewis Levy Real Estate Broker, 1890.
Map of Port Angeles Washington. Tacoma: N.R. Bank Note Company, 1912.
Sanborn fire Insurance Maps: 1891, 1897, 1911.1917, 1924, 1947, 1949, 1952,
1955, and 1964.
Smich C.E., Norman R., Compiled by. Map of Port Angeles Washington. San
Francisco: Schmid! Label & Lithograph Co., 1891.
Smith, Norman R., Compiled by. Map of Port Angeles Washington Terrilory. ,
1884.
Ware, Edwin, Draughtsman. Port Angeles and Suburbs (sjc). Port Angeles
W.T., 1889
Ware, W.J. Compiled by. Townsite of Port Angeles and Vicinity. Port Angeles:
WJ. Ware, 1891.
Other Sources
Polk's Clallam County Classified Business Direclory. Kansas City, Mo.:
R.L.Polk Co., various editions.
Port Angeles Public Library: Patricia Can1pbell Room Vertical Files
Port Angeles Public Library: Pholograph Albums (including the Bert Kellogg
Pholographs Collection).
Field Site No.: FIW118
Attachment B
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 37 of 86
r
r
r
J
~
I
I
Historic Inventory Report 2000
Project
North
Port Angeles, Washington
118 I 120 West First Street
Field Site No.: FIW11 8
Commerce/Trade
Site Map: 2
Attachment B
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 38 of 86
GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
City of Port Angeles and
Public Plaza, LLLP
This agreement is made between the City of Port Angeles, a non-charter code city and municipal
corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) and Public Plaza
LLLP (hereinafter called the Grantee) for the façade improvement project described in this
document and its attachments (herein called the Project).
WHEREAS, the City has allocated Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
program income to a façade improvement and rehabilitation grant program, which is a CDBG-
eligible activity; and
WHEREAS, the City has awarded a grant to reimburse a part of the costs of façade
improvements for the property located at 108-120 West 1st Street, Port Angeles; Parcel
Numbers 063000003205 and 063000003205 and
WHEREAS, the Grantee has agreed to perform the work to improve the facade of the
above described property;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and Grantee do mutually agree to the following terms and
conditions regarding the above mentioned property to be improved using City funds through the
Facade Grant Program:
1.SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Grantee will complete in a satisfactory and proper manner as determined by the City the
work described in the Project Overview. A listing of detailed project tasks is in the Façade
Grant Application No. 22-03.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Grantee: Public Plaza, LLLP
Grant No. 22-03
Section A: Brief Description
Funds will be used Create horizontal unity between the main building and the adjacent building
on the west by: Making the tan section continue to the right of the building; adding columns to
the building on the right; continuing gray accents toward the top of the building façade to match
the adjacent building; updating tan, mustard and eggplant colors on the front of the building to
match new chosen tile; extending horizontal elements to the building addition; changing colors
to match new tile; and changing base tile color and main entry façade to match new tile.
Budget Category Goals/Expected Results/Products: Improvements to the building’s exterior
façade.
21AGeneralAdmin The project is anticipated to result in façade improvements that will
enhance the physical appearance, accessibility, and overall value of the
building as well as surrounding areas.
Attachment C
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 39 of 86
2. GRANTEE’S OBLIGATIONS
The Grantee warrants that they are the owner of the above property or has written permission
from the Owner of the property to perform the proposed improvements described in the Project
Overview and Scope of Work and Budget and incorporated herein by reference.
Grantee agrees to complete work described in the attached Application within ONE HUNDRED
EIGHTY (180) days after the effective date. In the event the Director of Community and
Economic Development finds that the Grantee has commenced the work with reasonable
diligence but, due to factors beyond its reasonable control, the Grantee is unable to complete the
work within 180 days, the City Manager is authorized to extend the time to complete the work.
All façade improvements shall be consistent with zoning and building codes currently in effect
for the City. The Grantee shall assure that any permit or review necessary under City ordinances
shall be approved prior to beginning the work on the façade improvement begins.
The Grantee shall be responsible for the construction and management of the entire project.
Once complete, if the façade improvements are maintained for at least five years, the Grantee is
not obligated to repay any part of the grant to the CITY. If it is determined, at the City’s sole
discretion, that the façade improvements are not maintained for at least five years after
completion, the Grantee shall immediately repay to the CITY the amount of the grant, less 20%
of the amount for each year the façade improvements were maintained.
3. BUDGET
The City will reimburse to the Grantee the amount of 50% or $20,000, whichever is less, for
eligible incurred costs and expenses for the Project according to the budget shown on the Scope
of Work and Budget. Only the work that is outlined in the Project Overview and included in
Facade Grant Application No. 22-03 will be eligible for reimbursement.
It is understood that this agreement is funded with CDBG program income funds. The Grantee
acknowledges and agrees that the funds must be used only for CDBG-eligible expenditures as
proposed in Façade Grant Application No. 22-03 and approved by the City Planning
Commission.
4. PAYMENT
SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET
Grantee: Public Plaza, LLLP
Grant No. 22-03
Section C: Project Scope and Budget
Budget Category Project
Activities
Project
Totals
Applicant’s
Contribution
City
Contribution
21AGeneralAdmin Materials and
Labor
$129,435 $99,435 $20,000
Attachment C
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 40 of 86
Disbursement of funds shall be made only after the Project is complete and certified by City staff
to be in compliance with the approved design. The work must also adhere to any required
inspections before funds are disbursed for reimbursement. All documentation for payment must
be provided at one time to the City for one payout, and the receipts must be provided no later
than six (6) months after the application has been approved or as stipulated in the request for an
extension. Payment will be made to the Grantee by the City within four weeks after City deems
all project costs and documentation to be complete. Payment shall be made only to the Grantee.
The Grantee’s request for reimbursement must include itemized invoices detailing the work
completed and materials purchased, with proof that payments in full have been made to
Contractors and vendors, if applicable.
Grantee acknowledges, and agrees to inform its Contractor, that the City has no obligation to pay
the Contractor for work performed for the Grantee under this Program. This agreement shall not
be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties, and no
third party shall have any claim or right of action hereunder for any cause whatsoever.
Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by both parties, the Grantee’s total reimbursement under
this agreement, including labor and materials, shall not exceed the maximum sum of $20,000.
The budget for labor and materials is outlined in the Scope of Work and Budget. Budgets for
each line item may be modified upon mutual agreement between the two parties, but in any
event, the total payment to Grantee shall not exceed $20,000.
5. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. General Compliance. The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable Federal,
State and local laws, regulations, and policies, governing the funds provided under this
agreement.
B. Effective Date. Grant was approved by the Planning Commission on October 26, 2022
which is the effective date of this agreement.
C. Independent Contractor. Nothing contained in this agreement is intended to, or will be
construed in any manner, as creating or establishing the relationship of employer/employee
between the parties. The Grantee will at all times remain an “independent contractor” with
respect to the services to be performed under this agreement. The City will be exempt from
payment of all Unemployment Compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance
and Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as the Grantee is an independent contractor.
D. Hold Harmless. The Grantee will hold harmless, defend and indemnify the City from any
and all claims, actions, suits, charges and judgments whatsoever that arise out of the Grantee’s
performance or nonperformance of the services or subject matter called for in this agreement.
E. Workers’ Compensation. The Grantee will provide Workers’ Compensation Insurance
Coverage for all of its employees involved in the performance of this agreement.
F. Contract with Contractor. Each contractor who is performing the work approved for this
Project shall have a valid State of Washington Contractor’s License.
Attachment C
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 41 of 86
G. Labor Code/Prevailing Wage. Grantee acknowledges and agrees that the Grantee’s
improvements to be constructed with the proceeds of the grant constitute construction, alteration,
demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out
of public funds. Grantee shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local
laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards and payment of prevailing wages (collectively,
"Prevailing Wage Laws").
Grantee shall (i) require its contractors and subcontractors to submit certified copies of payroll
records to Grantee; (ii) maintain complete copies of such certified payroll records; and (iii) make
such records available to City and its designees for inspection and copying during regular
business hours.
Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees,
volunteers, agents and representatives from and against any and all present and future claims,
arising out of or in any way connected with Grantee’s obligation to comply with all Prevailing
Wage Laws, including all claims that may be made by contractors, subcontractors or other third
party claimants.
H. Funding Source Recognition. The Grantee will insure recognition of the roles of the City
in providing services through this agreement.
I. Suspension or Termination. The City may suspend or terminate this agreement if the City
determines, at its sole discretion, that the Grantee has materially failed to comply with any terms
of this agreement, which include (but are not limited to) the following:
• Failure to comply with any of the rules, regulations or provisions referred to herein,
or such statutes, regulations, guidelines, policies or directives as may become
applicable at any time;
• Failure, for any reason, of the Grantee to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its
obligations under this agreement; or
• Submission by the Grantee to the City of reports that are incorrect or incomplete in
any material respect.
6. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Financial Management Accounting Standards. The Grantee agrees to adhere to the
accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and
maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.
B. Documentation and Record Keeping. The Grantee will maintain thorough records
pertinent to the activities to be funded under this agreement, including records adequate to
document that the funds were expended on CDBG-eligible activities.
C. Access to Records and Retention. All such records and all other records pertinent to the
work undertaken under this agreement will be retained by the Grantee for a period of six years
after the City’s final audit of Project, unless a longer period is required to resolve audit findings
or litigation. In such cases, the City will request a longer period of record retention.
Attachment C
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 42 of 86
D. Audits and Inspections. All Grantee records with respect to any matters covered by this
agreement will be made available to the City and duly authorized officials of the state and federal
government, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit,
examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data.
Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the Grantee within 30 days after
receipt by the Grantee. Failure of the Grantee to comply with the above audit requirements will
constitute a violation of this agreement and may result in the withholding of future payments.
E. Reporting. The Grantee, at such times and in such forms as the City may require, will
furnish the City such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services
undertaken pursuant to this agreement, the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in
connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this agreement.
7. PERFORMANCE WAIVER
The City’s failure to act with respect to a breach by the Grantee does not waive its right to act
with respect to subsequent or similar breaches. The failure of the City to exercise or enforce any
right or provision will not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.
8. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This document states the entire agreement between the City and the Grantee for the use of funds
received under this agreement and it supersedes all prior communications and proposals, whether
electronic, oral, or written between the City and the Grantee with respect to this agreement.
....................................................................................................................................
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Grantee have executed this agreement as of the date
and year last written below.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES: GRANTEE: Public Plaza, LLLP
By: , City Manager By: , Governor
Date: Date:
Approved as to form:
Attachment C
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 43 of 86
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
Attachment C
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 44 of 86
Action Item #2
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 45 of 86
Date: October 26, 2022
To: Planning Commission
From: Ben Braudrick, Senior Planner
Subject: Draft Climate Resiliency Implementation Plan Public Hearing
Background / Analysis: As the Climate Resiliency Plan drafting and public process were underway in
2020-2022, the North Olympic Development Council (NODC) was awarded funding through the Puget
Sound Partnership from the EPA's National Estuary Program for Phase 2: Municipal Level Climate
Action Planning for the North Olympic Peninsula. Building on the 2015 Climate Change Preparedness
Plan for the North Olympic Peninsula (CCP NOP), this project continues to establish regional adaptation
and mitigation goals for the North Olympic Peninsula and develop specific climate action plans for local
communities that integrate with the CCP NOP plan, local government comprehensive and shoreline
master plans, and other relevant plans.
The NODC reached out to Department of Community and Economic Development Staff to invite a staff
member to sit on a steering committee to lead the grant process. In April 2022 the NODC selected the
City of Port Angeles as one of three governments to provide technical assistance on an aspect of climate
change preparedness. City staff decided on the drafting of an Implementation Plan for the Climate
Resiliency Plan as the logical next step in the Climate Resiliency Plan process. The project kicked off in
July with five 2-hour work sessions. These work sessions brought together community stakeholders,
natural resource professionals, and City staff to begin thinking about how each of the 55 actions within
the Climate Resiliency Plan could be implemented using the following categories for evaluation:
• How actions should be prioritized and their timelines
• Lead agencies/departments
• Equity
• Affordability
• Targets and indicators used to measure success
• Roles/responsibilities
• Funding opportunities
• Partners and coordination
The draft Implementation Plan incorporating all the input from the work sessions was finalized in mid-
October. Notice of the Public Hearing inviting the public to provide comment was posted to the City’s
website on October 19 and in the Peninsula Daily News on October 22. The Plan was also provided to the
Climate Action Subcommittees and 75-member community stakeholder list, including the Climate Action
Planning Group, for comments on October 19. Staff’s intent is to have comments provided by October 30
for incorporation into a final draft to be sent to City Council and the NODC in mid-November. Final
adoption of the Plan is scheduled for the regular December 6, 2022 City Council meeting.
Recommendation: Staff requests that the Planning Commission open the public hearing and
recommend the City Council adopt the Draft Climate Resiliency Plan with any proposed changes
provided by community members at the public hearing, the Planning Commission, and community
stakeholders to be incorporated in the final draft.
Attachments: Attachment 1: Draft Climate Resiliency Implementation Plan
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 46 of 86
Port Angeles
Port Angeles
Addendum to the Climate Resiliency Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
DRAFT | October 2022
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 47 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 2
Introduction
The North Olympic Peninsula is already experiencing increases in extreme weather events that lead to disastrous flooding and landslides, prolonged heat waves, reduced summer streamflow, and impaired air quality (see the NODC Climate Resiliency and Planning report for a full summary of climate science updates and impacts). As climate science continues to advance, we have a clearer picture of how existing and projected climate impacts will continue to affect our community without immediate action. This Implementation Plan will serve as a strategic and coordinated roadmap to help guide City of Port Angeles (the City) in executing the strategies and actions outlined in the Climate Resiliency Plan (CRP), adopted in June 2022 following a comprehensive stakeholder engagement process.
Meeting the CRP’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets and making meaningful progress towards building resilience within our communities will require time and resources, as well as dedicated and collaborative efforts from the City, regional partners and stakeholders, and the public. This implementation plan provides a detailed framework for the implementation phase of the CRP process, including information on action sequencing, coordination and funding, tracking and monitoring progress, and integrating equity considerations and addressing related barriers. This plan includes the following sections:
• Introduction: Overview of Port Angeles’ Climate Resiliency Plan, this implementation plan, and the methods and phasing of the implementation plan.
• Roles and responsibilities: Overview of CRP implementation oversight and accountability.
• Monitoring and evaluation: Summary of the action implementation tracking and evaluation process.
• Equity considerations: Summary of equity priorities and barriers, with specific CRP actions that address those considerations.
• Funding: Overview of how CRP implementation will be funded and potential funding options available through the new Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), passed at the federal level under the Biden administration.
• Partners and coordination: Opportunities and synergies with other local, regional, and state plans, programs, initiatives.
• Action matrix: Key implementation details for each action of the CRP by sector.
Frontline community priorities and equitable distribution of climate action benefits were essential considerations when developing and prioritizing strategies and actions in the CRP, particularly when considering affordable housing, equitable transportation and transit access, and considerations for the rural community. Similarly, ensuring that actions are implemented in a way that aligns with the needs and priorities of the City’s most vulnerable populations and underrepresented groups is critical to building true resilience. Ongoing engagement with community members and building meaningful partnerships with groups most at risk to climate impacts will be key towards ensuring we are tracking our action progress and equity-related goals.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 48 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 3
Methods
To identify effective implementation considerations and pathways for CRP strategies and actions, the City engaged key implementation partners and stakeholders through a series of virtual meetings in July 2022. The five meetings were organized by the five focus areas of CRP and structured as interactive working sessions and discussions. Participants offered input on the following implementation considerations during virtual meetings and were invited to provide additional input for several weeks after the conclusion of the meeting series:
• Lead agency and indicator tracking
• Partnering departments, agencies, and organizations
• Costs and funding considerations
• Equity considerations
• Timeframe, early win actions, and other timeline considerations
• Barriers and other considerations
Phasing & Timeline
The lifecycle of the CRP implementation process consists of three overarching phases detailed in the table below. This implementation plan marks the completion of Phase I. As we approach Phase II in 2023, identifying and securing funding sources for all near- and mid-term action will be a key priority. Sequencing details for individual action implementation are included in the Action Matrix section of the Implementation Roadmap.
Phase I Phase II Phase III
(2021-2022)(2023-2026)(2027-2028)
• CRP and the implementation planning process
• Participate in pilot program led by Department of Commerce (Commerce) to begin integrating CRP into the 2025 Comprehensive Plan update
• Attempt to secure funding for all near-term actions
• Identify alternative implementation opportunities for inadequately funded actions
• Complete early win and near-term actions (See Action Matrix)• Integrate actions into Comprehensive Plan update
• Complete mid-term actions and continue working towards long-term action implementation
• Evaluate progress towards goals
• Update GHG inventory and CRP
• Reassess implementation strategies to account for funding realities
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 49 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 4
Roles & Responsibilities
The City’s Department of Community & Economic Development (DCED) will be responsible for ongoing CRP coordination, monitoring, evaluation, and reporting. Successful implementation of the Plan is dependent on staff capacity, successful partnerships, and budget alignment throughout the duration of the CRP implementation process. In order to facilitate consistent department dedication to this planning effort, the DCED issued a budget request for a full-time climate coordinator position in the near-term to provide additional CRP implementation support and oversight.
Key oversight responsibilities will include:
• Provide annual progress reports to the City Manager on recent developments for in-progress action items and goal/target tracking.
• Provide monthly email updates and quarterly memos and convene meetings, as needed, to discuss implementation progress.
• Conduct a greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory update process every five years (without a dedicated climate coordinator) or every two years with a dedicated climate coordinator.
• Update the CRP every five years to reflect progress to date, ongoing feedback from stakeholders and the public, GHG inventory updates, and any new innovative technologies or strategies.
• Work with the City’s Code Enforcement Division as needed to provide input on enforcement actions from a perspective that accounts for the goals, indicators, and actions of the CRP.
As an early win in the implementation process, the City will look to formalize the Climate Planning Action Group (CAPG) as a community advisory group to support implementation and ensure effective feedback loops with community and stakeholders. This effort will aim to sustain ongoing broad community involvement with particular focus on engaging with the most at-risk groups and populations.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 50 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 5
Monitoring & Evaluation
The DCED will treat the CRP as a living document and will adaptively manage the ongoing implementation and plan update process. An adaptive management approach will allow the DCED to adjust and course correct as needed in response to worsening climate-related natural disasters, advances in climate strategies and solutions, feedback from ongoing stakeholder and community engagement, and lessons learned.
To effectively monitor the plan, the DCED will track progress towards goals using the following targets and sector-specific indicators developed in parallel with the CRP’s action and strategy development phase. We will continue to refine these indicators and set specific targets in the early stages of Phase II to ensure we are effectively measuring the performance and outcomes of actions and progressing towards out sector goals.
TARGETS INDICATORS
OVERALL GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
• Reach carbon neutrality by 2030 • MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
COMMUNITY RESILIENCE & WELLBEING
• Ensure that 100% of Port Angeles residents have a safe and affordable place to live
• Ensure that 100% of Port Angeles residents are served by emergency services, including food, water, and communication systems
• Increase partner (i.e., business, nonprofit, tribal, advisory committees, residents, other governments) coordination
• Average housing and utility cost
• Air quality
• Drinking water quality
• # and % of overall housing units
• # of Community Paramedic contacts that have successful referral to services
• # of REdisCOVERY contacts that have successful referral to services
• % of population that can be accommodated in community safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
ECOSYSTEM HEALTH
• Increase tree canopy cover such that each neighborhood has a minimum of 30% urban tree canopy coverage
• Increase access to parks, trail, or green space for 100% of Port Angeles residents
• % tree canopy
• % of residents living within one-third mile of park, trail, or green spaces
• Length of trails
• Net carbon stored (MTCO2e)
• pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 51 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 6
TARGETS INDICATORS
TRANSPORTATION
• Adopt standard to reduce transportation fuel emissions intensities by 20% by 20301
• Increase transportation access and opportunities to residents, including Sunday and holiday service, to 100% of Port Angeles residents
• Ensure EV infrastructure is provided over time to enable complete transition away from sale of gas-powered vehicles by 2035 and the resulting demand for EV infrastructure
• Continuity of transit services on Sundays and holidays
• % of vulnerable communities with quality transit access
• # of miles of pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure • # of pedestrian/bicycle-related traffic incidents
• # of Vehicle miles traveled
• % of passenger vehicles that are electric• # of EV charging stations
BUILDINGS & ENERGY
• Promote the use of alternative energy, energy conservation technology, and smart energy grid.
• Encourage businesses with low-carbon footprints.
• Promote and utilize environment-enhancing conservation practices
• # and % of overall housing units
• Renewable energy consumption
• Energy use per capita
MATERIALS & CONSUMPTION
• Reduce GHG emissions by City facilities and operations to help reach carbon neutrality by 2030
• Reach 75% recycling recovery by 2025
• Reduce amount of organics in the solid waste stream to below 10% by 2025
• Waste diversion rate
• % of food recovered
• Water consumption rates
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
If annual progress reports indicate that the City is not on track to meet commitments and goals, the City Manager, with guidance from the CAPG, will provide direction to strengthen or add actions as necessary. Additional steps to ensure close tracking, evaluation, and course correction include:
• Use of quarterly memos to identify actions not on track to meet targets and goals.
• Regular forecasting to anticipate timeline shifts and unintended outcomes before they occur.
• Regular communication with collaborating City staff and external partners to streamline coordination, discuss progress, and leverage support.
1 Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard (HB 1091) requires a 20% reduction in the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in Washington by 2038, compared to a 2017 baseline level. Reductions in carbon intensity may be achieved through cleaner fuels or by purchasing clean fuel credits from cleaner producers such as those providing electricity as fuel. Boats, trains, aircraft, and military vehicles & equipment are excluded.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 52 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 7
Equity Considerations
Second only to impact, equity was an important evaluation criterion during CRP strategy and action development and prioritization. The City ranked 40 CRP actions on how each action impacts vulnerability across different populations and addresses historic inequalities and how equitably benefits and costs are distributed across the community. Equity rankings are found in each sector chapter of the CRP.
The table below details additional equity priorities, considerations, and barriers associated with each sector of the CRP flagged during the implementation meeting series and highlights actions that directly address equity concerns and priorities.
EQUITY PRIORITIES BARRIERS ACTIONS THAT ADDRESS EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS
COMMUNITY RESILIENCE & WELLBEING
• Integrate tribal priorities and processes
• Address areas most prone to flooding and landslides in low-income and rural areas
• Consider oxygen and electricity-dependent community members in emergency response and planning
• Clean water access
• Affordable housing options
• FEMA disaster response process can present equity issues
• CRW-1: Local food security
• CRW-1: Climate migration preparation
• CRW-1: Water supply monitoring & enhancement
• CRW-1: Comprehensive climate outreach & education
• CRW-1: Housing Action Plan implementation
• CRW-1: Hazard Mitigation Plan implementation
• CRW-2: Climate resilience & emergency planning
ECOSYSTEM HEALTH
• Integrate tribal priorities and processes, including salmon monitoring and protection and shoreline protection
• High costs for native and drought-tolerant plant landscaping
• EH-1: Forest and marine habitat preservation
• EH-1: Urban tree canopy, parks, and open space
• EH-2: Salmon Habitat protection• EH-3: Cost-benefit analysis of shoreline armor repair:
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 53 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 8
EQUITY PRIORITIES BARRIERS ACTIONS THAT ADDRESS EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS
TRANSPORTATION
• Equitable access to transit and multimodal transportation options
• Improvements to roads that serve as critical access routes on the peninsula, particularly in the most rural and western areas of the region
• Lack of equity in the current EV market due to high cost of technology adoption
• T-1: Transit infrastructure, equity, & safety
• T-1: Municipal fleet electrification & idle reduction• T-1: Biking and walking infrastructure
• T-2: Transportation vulnerability
BUILDINGS & ENERGY
• Electrical vehicle charging for multifamily and low-income housing
• Energy efficiency and weatherization assistance for low-income and underserved communities
• Renters and undocumented community members do not qualify for energy incentive programs
• Buy-in costs for at-home solar are prohibitive
• BE-1: Energy-efficient home heating sources
• BE-1: Electric vehicle parking requirements
• BE-2: Community renewable energy grid
CONSUMPTION & WASTE
• Accessible food donation programs for low-income communities• Access to composting programs for renters unable to backyard compost
• Access and capacity to transport bulky materials is an equity issue• Additional costs of commercial food waste programs may disproportionally impact small businesses
• CW-2: Residential food waste diversion programs:• CW-2: Commercial food waste diversion programs
To effectively track and measure equity in action outcomes, the DCED will conduct disaggregated analysis of performance indicators. In other words, we will track key demographic data and geographic distribution of people who receive a service, are enrolled in a program, or are otherwise impacted by an action. This information will be gathered as part of ongoing engagement with stakeholders and the public throughout the implementation process. A plan for continued engagement, particularly with frontline communities, and information gathering will be developed in the early part of phase II.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 54 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 9
Funding
The City will identify and utilize resources within the City’s existing budget to the extent possible; however, full implementation of the plan will require additional funds. City staff will pursue all viable external grant opportunities available to local jurisdictions, taking full advantage of the breadth of funding options currently available under new federal legislation including the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). These policies were designed to provide municipalities with competitive funding opportunities to pursue large-scale infrastructure and climate change resilience projects, including transportation improvements, energy resilience, natural disaster prevention, and broadband enhancement.
The Action Matrix provides more specific funding opportunities related to each strategy and action. The following list highlights high-level funding opportunities available by CRP sector:
Community Resilience & Wellbeing • Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program in Washington
• Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
• Water & Groundwater Storage and Conveyance
• Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant
• Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program.
Ecosystem Health:• National Culvert Removal Replacement & Restoration Grant
• Brownfield Remediation Program
• Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant
Transportation: • Buses and Bus Facilities Program
• Capital Investment Grants Program
• Electric or Low Emitting Ferry Pilot Program
• Formula Grants for Rural Areas
• Public Transportation Safety Program; Reconnecting Communities
• Public Transportation Innovation
• Technical Assistance and Workforce Development Program
• Safe Streets for All program
• Rural Surface Transportation Grant Program
• Low and No Emission Bus Programs
• Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grants
• National Infrastructure Project Assistance (AKA “Megaprojects” or MEGA)
• Charging and fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant Program
• Grants for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Improvements at Public School Facilities
• Port Infrastructure Development Program
• Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants
• Emergency Relief Program
• Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program
Buildings & Energy: • Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program
• Grants for Energy Efficiency and Resilience Code Adoption
• Energy Improvement in Rural or Remote Areas
• Community Wildfire Defense Grant Program
Making these investments is a critical step towards ensuring our community can avoid future climate-related costs of inaction. Additionally, it will bring other valuable environmental, social, and economic benefits such as improved public health, local green jobs, affordable housing, and livable, walkable, and thriving neighborhoods.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 55 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 10
Partners & Coordination
Coordinated efforts between the City and local and regional stakeholder groups and organizations, like the Climate Planning Action Group (CAPG) and North Olympic Peninsula Resource Conservation and Development Council (NODC), have served as the driving force behind local climate action in Port Angeles. These partnerships helped ensure that climate goals and strategies were prioritized for the update of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan and ultimately gave way to the development of the CRP.
Climate change is a far-reaching issue that intersects across all social, political, and economic spheres. As such, the CRP was intentionally designed to align with many existing and proposed City and regional planning efforts across various agencies and departments. We also recognize that holistic climate planning will require integration into City comprehensive planning. As such, the City has already taken the first steps in this direction by submitting the CRP actions identified for comprehensive plan alignment to the Department of Commerce for integration into the 2025 Comprehensive Plan update. The City is also participating in a Commerce-led Climate Planning pilot program designed to support the City in this process.
The following represents a list of relevant plans, programs, initiatives that will be considered for coordination and integration throughout the implementation process:
• City of Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan
• Port Angeles Capital Facilities and Transportation Improvement Plan
• Port Angeles Housing Action Plan
• Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program
• Port Angeles Council 2-Year Strategic Plan
• Port Angeles Stormwater Management Action Plan
• Port Angeles Water Systems Plan
• Port Angeles ADA Transition Plan
• Clallam County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
• Clallam County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Clallam County Community Wildfire Protection Plan
• Clallam County Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan
• Community Health Needs Assessment Report
• Clallam County Solid Waste Management Plan
Implementing CRP actions in a way that enhances synergies with and maximizes impacts of existing and future City planning will depend on many local, regional, and state partners and collaborators. The Action Matrix details key partners and collaborating entities for each CRP action.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 56 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 11
Implementation Details
Acronyms
BPA Bonneville Power Agreement OlyCAP Olympic Community Action Programs
BUILD Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Transportation Discretionary Grants Program P&R Parks & Recreation Department
CCEM Clallam County Emergency Management PABA Port Angeles Business Association
DCED Community & Economic Development Department PRTPO Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization
COPA City of Port Angeles PSP Puget Sound Partnership
CRP Climate Resiliency Plan PTC Peninsula Trails Coalition
DCD Department of Community Development PUD Public Utility District
DNR Washington Department of Natural Resources PWU Public Works & Utilities Department
ECY Washington State Department of Ecology SWAC Solid Waste Advisory Committee
EDC Economic Development Corporation USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency USCG United States Coast Guard
FMLC Feiro Marine Life Center WA DFW Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife
FTE Full time employee WDNR Washington Department of Natural Resources
ILFI International Living Future Institute WPAG Western Public Agencies Group
LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation
MFD Multifamily Dwelling WSG Washington Sea Grant
MRC Marine Resources Committee
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NODC North Olympic Development Council
NOLT North Olympic Land Trust
NOPLE Nort Olympic Peninsula Lead Entity for Salmon
NOSC North Olympic Salmon Coalition
NPS/NF National Park Service/National Forest
OFM Office of Financial Management
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 57 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 12
Icon Key
Affordability = Lower affordability = Moderate affordability = Higher affordability
Timeline = Early win(1-2 years)= Short-term (2-4 years)= Mid-term(4-6 years)= Long-term(6+ years)= Ongoing
Action Matrix
ID Action Name Lead
Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding
status
Funding
sources Timeline Partners
CRW-1. INCREASE COMMUNITY CAPACITY TO RESPOND TO FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE
1
CRW- 1: City price on carbon PWU, COPA Finance Dept.Not currently funded BPA and affiliated organizations, PUD, other local jurisdictions
Equity and other considerations:
• Equity is embedded in the architecture of how we do urban planning thus carbon pricing can help promote equity.
• Pricing carbon might harm some small businesses that don't have the capacity to become greener and create a cost burden.
2
CRW- 1: Local food security DCED, P&R • Ensure that 100% of Port Angeles residents are served by emergency services, including food, water, and communication systems
BIL grants: Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program in Washington; Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
WSU Extension, Food Coalition, NOLT, Farmers markets, Master Gardeners, Local food banks
Equity and other considerations:
• Cost associated with community gardens and watering can be a barrier.
• Consider implementing a program that provides rain barrels.
• Need a food garden water program where we don't charge the same rate for food garden watering.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 58 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 13
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
3
CRW- 1: County-City coordination
DCED N/A
Equity and other considerations:
• Important to respect the process and way that Tribal governments work.
• The current location of the hospital is a risk.
4
CRW-1: Climate migration preparation
DCED,City Manager,OFM
• Average housing and utility cost Housing Coordinator 2 FTE funded through Spring 2024
State agencies
Equity and other considerations:
• This action increases housing availability.
• High equity MCA score.
5
CRW-1: Water supply monitoring & enhancement
PWU • Drinking water quality
• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
Not currently funded BIL grants: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund; Water & Groundwater Storage and Conveyance
FMLC, Dry Creek Water Association
Equity and other considerations:
• Benefits those who have trouble accessing clean water.
6
CRW-1: Sea level rise vulnerability assessment of City assets
DCED, PWU, Fire Dept.• Drinking water quality
• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
Unfunded Priority Chamber or PABA
7
CRW-1: Community Rating System participation
Fire Dept.• % of population that can be accommodated in community safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
Unfunded Priority CCEM
Equity and other considerations:
Consider FEMA process equity issues.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 59 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 14
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
8
CRW-1: City asset vulnerability tool
DCED, Finance Dept., Fire Dept.• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
Not currently funded
9
CRW-1: Comprehensive climate outreach & education
DCED, potential climate FTE in long range planning division
• Air quality
• Drinking water quality
• # of Community Paramedic contacts that have successful referral to services
• # of REdisCOVERY contacts that have successful referral to services
• % of population that can be accommodated in community safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
Unfunded Priority School districts, Peninsula CollegeLibraries, Boys and Girls Club
Equity and other considerations:
• High equity score in MCA.
• B&G Club can help with education and outreach and facilitate connections with diverse populations and low-income families.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 60 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 15
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
10
CRW-1: Comprehensive Plan priorities
DCED • Average housing and utility cost
• Average housing and utility cost
• Air quality
• Drinking water quality
• # and % of overall housing units
• # of Community Paramedic contacts that have successful referral to services
• # of REdisCOVERY contacts that have successful referral to services
• % of population that can be accommodated in community safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
Partially Funded
Equity and other considerations:
• COPA needs to become more walkable with greater housing density and prevent suburban sprawl within Clallam County.
• Include a clear vision for COPA in Comprehensive Planning.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 61 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 16
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
11
CRW-1: Housing Action Plan implementation
DCED • # and % of overall housing units Housing Coordinator 2 FTE funded through Spring 2024
Housing Authority, Habitat for humanity, Tribal partners, County's major employers
Equity and other considerations:
• Prevent turning affordable housing into short-term rentals.
• High equity MCA score.
• Need a comprehensive set of interviews with Seattle condominium developers about the barriers to private development in COPA.
12
CRW-1: Hazard Mitigation Plan implementation
Fire dept.• # of Community Paramedic contacts that have successful referral to services
• # of REdisCOVERY contacts that have successful referral to services
• % of population that can be accommodated in community safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
Unfunded Priority BIL grants: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund; Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant
Equity and other considerations:
• Addresses needs of a vulnerable community. Landslide/flooding areas are generally located in western PA, which generally is lower income.
• Address residents needs who are dependent on electricity to run their medical devices.
• Need a community mesh network for mass disaster communications.
• Need to identify partners to help with assessment of vulnerable populations.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 62 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 17
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
CRW-2. PREPARE PORT ANGELES FOR FUTURE EXTREME EVENTS
13
CRW-2: Wildland urban interface
Climate coordinator, DCED • % of population that can be accommodated in community safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
• Reduced # of backlogged Capital facilities
Not currently funded
14
CRW-2: Climate resilience & emergency planning
Climate coordinator, DCED • # of Community Paramedic contacts that have successful
• referral to services
• # of REdisCOVERY contacts that have successful referral to services
• % of population that can be accommodated in community
• Safety hubs or other disaster relief centers
Unfunded Priority BIL grant: Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program
American Red Cross, mental health services
Equity and other considerations:
• Need reliable and consistent electricity to run medical devices for those with chronic illnesses.
• Need a community network for mass disaster communications.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 63 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 18
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
EH-1. INCREASE OPPORTUNITIES FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE
EH-1: Forest and marine habitat preservation
NOLT, Legal Department, PWU, City Parks
• Net carbon stored (MT CO2e)Partially funded WDNR and local tribes National Marine Sanctuary, Olympic NPS/NF, NOAA, PSP, WA DNR, WA DFW, FMLC, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, NOPLE, Nature Conservancy, Private timber landholders
Equity and other considerations:
• Working with local tribes means respecting their processes, timelines, and feedback.
EH-2. RESTORE AND PROTECT SHORELINE, AQUATIC, AND FOREST HABITAT
EH-2: Urban tree canopy, parks, and open space
PWU • % tree canopy
• % of residents living within one-third mile of park, trail, or green space
• Net carbon stored (MT CO2e)
Partially funded WDNR Clallam County DCD, P&R Board
Equity and other considerations:
• Treat trees as infrastructure.
• Update City’s list of approved tree species for urban planning and send to local private nurseries and households.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 64 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 19
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
EH-2: Native plant landscaping
DCED • % tree canopy
• % of residents living within one-third mile of park, trail, or green space
• Net carbon stored (MT CO2e)
Not currently funded Private plant nurseries, WSU Extension
Equity and other considerations:
• Native and drought tolerant plants and landscaping are expensive and time consuming to maintain. Consider cost barriers for lower income community members.• Discourage traditional grass lawn growing with water use and fertilizers.
• Develop, test, and demonstrate native plant landscaping options suited for this area as a public outreach tool.
EH-2: Climate- sensitive tree species
DCED • % tree canopy
• Net carbon stored (MT CO2e)
Funded P&R Board, Port Angeles Shade Trees
EH-2: Critical area protection DCED • Net carbon stored (MT CO2e)Not currently funded NOPLE,Port
Equity and other considerations:
• Leverage assistance to those that are already housed or own property in these areas.
• Integrate into Comprehensive Plan Amendment effort
EH-2: Coastal erosion reduction
• pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Funded WSG, USACE, Port, USCG
Equity and other considerations:
• As an early win component of the action, leverage existing resources on soft armoring best practices and local experts.
EH-2: Shoreline Master Program updates
• pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Not currently funded Port, USCG
EH-2: Submerged habitat monitoring
• pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Not currently funded DNR, Clallam County MRC
Equity and other considerations:
• Calculate the amount of submerged habitat.
• Monitor City actions and City-owned projects and measure impact (e.g., Discovery trail mgmt.).
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 65 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 20
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
EH-2: Salmon habitat protection
DCED • pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Not currently funded NOSC
Equity and other considerations:
• Be clear about where habitat development and restoration need to happen.
• Need a broader vision and planning around salmon monitoring and protection.
EH-2: Land-based pollutant reduction
PWU • pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Funded
EH-2: Culvert replacement • pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Unfunded Priority BIL grant: National Culvert Removal, Replacement & Restoration Grant
PWU
Equity and other considerations:
• Explore opportunities for daylighting in City creeks (Lower Peabody Creek).
EH-2: Capital Facilities Plan implementation
ECY, Port • pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Unfunded Priority Port, COPA (permitting), DNR, ECY Toxics team
EH-3. ADDRESS SEA LEVEL RISE
EH-3: Resilience of clean-up sites
• pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Partially funded BIL grants: Brownfield Remediation Program; Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant
Equity and other considerations:
• Shorelines are critical for the Lower Elwha Tribe.
• Explore potential for estuarine restoration.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 66 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 21
ID Action Name Lead Department(S)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
EH-3: Cost-benefit analysis of shoreline armor repair
• pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Unfunded Priority
Equity and other considerations:
Shorelines are critical for the Lower Elwha Tribe.
EH-3: Boat launch repair • pH of Port Angeles Harbor and nearby marine waters
Partially funded
Equity and other considerations:
• Shorelines are critical for the Lower Elwha Tribe.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 67 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 22
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
T-1. DECREASE TRANSPORTATION RELATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.
T-1: Transit infrastructure, equity, & safety
Clallam Transit • Continuity of transit services on Sundays and holidays
• % of vulnerable communities with quality transit access
• # of miles of pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure
• # of pedestrian/bicycle-related traffic incidents
• Vehicle miles traveled
Partially funded priority
BUILD grantBIL grants: Buses and Bus Facilities Program; Capital Investment Grants Program; Electric or Low Emitting Ferry Pilot Program; Formula Grants for Rural Areas; Public Transportation Safety Program; Reconnecting Communities; Public Transportation Innovation; Technical Assistance and Workforce Development Program; Safe Streets for All program; Rural Surface Transportation Grant Program; Low and No Emission Bus Programs; Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grants; National Infrastructure Project Assistance (a.k.a. “Megaprojects” or MEGA)
Clallam Transit
Equity and other considerations:
• High equity MCA score.
• Conduct feasibility studies for Park and Ride by Clallam Transit (Sequim).
• COPA (and/or Clallam County and Clallam Transit) should encourage or help fund a feasibility study for a PA to Seattle high speed ferry service.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 68 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 23
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
T-1: Increased electric vehicle use for the general public
COPA • % of passenger vehicles that are electric
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Partially funded BIL grant: Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant Program
PRTPO, PWU, private EV or EV charging businesses
Equity and other considerations:
• EV market is currently not promoting equity and this action is beyond city scope.
• Need to treat parking as a utility and manage parking demands in over-resourced areas. Consider EV charging as an attraction.• Need to monitor state and national trends in EV production/EV charging markets, and be prepared for opportunities (e.g., Safeway’s partnership with private EV charging company).
T-1: Biking and walking infrastructure
Clallam Transit • # of miles of pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure
• # of pedestrian/bicycle-related traffic incidents
• Vehicle miles traveled
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Partially funded priority
BIL grant: Reconnecting Communities Clallam Transit, Bird Global Inc., PTC, PWU, PRTPO
Equity and other considerations:
• This action is a priority from an equity perspective.
• This type of infrastructure is often best addressed during more comprehensive streetscape and roadway improvements.
• This infrastructure needs to be considered on par with other mobility solutions rather than separate.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 69 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 24
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
T-1: Municipal fleet electrification & idle reduction
PWU (Power Resources Group)
• % of passenger vehicles that are electric
• Vehicle miles traveled
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Not currently funded
BIL grant: Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant ProgramFunding through Volkswagen settlementNPS grant
Clallam County
Equity and other considerations:
• Public and municipal EV charging stations can support equity. Currently public EV charging stations are available for a fee.
• COPA is currently working on changing City code to help incentivize a transition to EV.
• Consider a partnership with Clallam County. Explore opportunities to share expensive EV charging infrastructure based on the limited sizes of city and county fleets.
T-1: Regional transport electrification
• % of passenger vehicles that are electric
• Vehicle miles traveled
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Partially funded BIL grant: Grants for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Improvements at Public School Facilities
Clallam Transit
Equity and other considerations:
• Benefits of non-carbon vehicles include cleaner air quality for full community.
• Regional electrification will be driven more by national/international EV market trends than local or state policy.
T-1: Port electrification PWU (Power Resources Group)
• % of passenger vehicles that are electric
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Not currently funded
BIL grant: Port Infrastructure Development Program
COPA
Equity and other considerations:
• Need to have conversations with Port leadership about electrification and explore the following question: (1) does the Port have the type of ship traffic that can take advantage of electrification if it was provided at the Port? (2) Are there alternate strategies to reduce emissions/energy use?
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 70 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 25
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
T-1: City employee commute emissions
COPA staff (with council approval)
• Vehicle miles traveled
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Funded City Manager
Equity and other considerations:
• Consider quantifying cost savings from employees not communicating to the office and use surveys as a tool to measure impact.
T-1: Medium- and heavy-duty vehicle decarbonization
COPA, Public Works Equipment Services
• % of passenger vehicles that are electric
• Vehicle miles traveled
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Not currently funded
BIL funding: Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants
Equity and other considerations:
• Examine fleet sharing model which exists in Pierce County and produces significant cost savings as a case study.
• Implement a fleet sharing program between jurisdictions on the Peninsula.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 71 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 26
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
T-2. ENHANCE TRANSPORTATION RESILIENCY BY PROMOTING PUBLIC TRANSIT AND ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION.
T-2: Transportation vulnerability
Public Works Engineering • Continuity of transit services on Sundays and holidays
• % of vulnerable communities with quality transit access
• # of miles of pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure
• # of pedestrian/bicycle-related traffic incidents
• Vehicle miles traveled
Unfunded Priority Potential FEMA fundingBIL grants: Emergency Relief Program; Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program
WSDOT, PRTPO, NODC, COPA Public Works
Equity and other considerations:
• Addresses needs of vulnerable communities and critical transportation routes; for example, there is a single road in and out of western COPA and it is prone to flooding.
• Currently collaborating with regional partners to identify transportation vulnerability, including bike and pedestrian routes, trails, and public transit routes.• Examine Bend’s Lincoln Street Bike Enhancement as a case study for a successful, inclusive and safe transportation improvement project.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 72 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 27
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
BE-1. REDUCE BUILDING-RELATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.
BE-1: Energy efficiency retrofits
COPA, City Light • Renewable energy consumption
• Energy use per capita
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Funded BIL grant: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program
Port Angeles Energy Efficiency Group, BPA, OlyCAP, large commercial entities, Clallam PUD
Equity and other considerations:
• City has low-income energy efficiency program through BPA, but there is need for additional outreach highlighting energy efficiency programs. • Racial justice and class issues with renters, low-income, and undocumented households, who are not eligible for energy efficiency incentives and do not have the upfront funds for investment for solar buy-in, for example.
• This action could be most supported by community action (e.g., volunteer energy audits, outreach to community about energy efficiency, performing retrofits).
BE-1: Energy-efficient home heating sources
City Light • Renewable energy consumption
• Energy use per capita
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Funded BIL grant: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program
BPA
Equity and other considerations:
• Need energy efficiency program for low-income housing.
• Need warming and cooling centers.• Need to educate public on recent studies showing the harms associated with household gas burning.
• Wood burning is a cultural tradition on the peninsula and policies about this must be sensitive to this. Gather input from local tribes and other stakeholders on cultural practices that should be protected.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 73 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 28
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
BE-1: Bonneville Power Administration renewal agreement
City Light • Renewable energy consumption
• Energy use per capita
Funded BIL grant: Grants for Energy Efficiency and Resilience Code Adoption
WPAG
Equity and other considerations:
• Need to advocate for lowest wholesale power rate.
• Salmon habitat protection and dam removal is an important consideration for tribes.
• Encourage BPA to provide all carbon-free product.
• Consider tidal energy to lessen impact on salmon and solar fields.
• Consider partnering with other local governments who contract with BPA to encourage more flexibility in power agreements to use other power sources (e.g., renewable power sources, community grid).
BE-1: Electric vehicle parking requirements
DCED • # and % of overall housing units
• Energy use per capita
Partially Funded City Light
Equity and other considerations:
• This will benefit those who live in MFD and provide access to EVs and bike infrastructure.
BE-1: Low-impact development
DCED • # and % of overall housing units
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Not currently funded
LEED Certification, Energy Star, ILFI,City Light, local conversation Groups
Equity and other considerations:
• Consider incentives for LEED certified buildings
• Consider developing a list of low-impact development techniques that have been successful in real world development situations to help the city and developers.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 74 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 29
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
BE-1: Green incentive program
DCED • # and % of overall housing units
• Energy use per capita
Unfunded Priority LEED Certification; City Light, Energy Star, ILFI, Conservation Group and other departments with relevant data
BE-2. SUPPORT ENERGY RESILIENCY BY INVESTING IN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND COMMUNITY-SCALE ENERGY PROJECTS.
BE-2: Community renewable energy grid
City Light (Energy Efficiency and Power Resource Group)
• Renewable energy consumption
• # and % of overall housing units
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Not currently funded
BIL grant: Energy Improvement in Rural or Remote Areas
Clallam PUD
Equity and other considerations:
• High equity MCA score.
• Consider tidal energy to lessen impact on salmon and solar field.
• Need to make sure we have stable energy during the winter.
BE-2: Climate-smart building and finance policies
DCED, Climate coordinator • # and % of overall housing units Unfunded Priority BIL grant: Community Wildfire Defense Grant Program
City Light (Power Resources Group)
BE-2: Tailored approaches for coastal infrastructure resilience
DCED, Climate coordinator • # and % of overall housing units Not currently funded
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 75 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 30
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
CW-1. REDUCE WASTE-RELATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS.
CW-1: Wastewater facility emissions reduction
Wastewater facilities • Waste diversion rate
• MTCO2e as measured through GHG inventories
Not currently funded
Companies that discharge to facilities
CW-1: Beneficial materials reuse
Solid Waste Utility, PWU, Landfill
• Waste diversion rate Unfunded Priority Around-Again, Goodwill, Habitat Store, Serenity House Thrift Store
Equity and other considerations:
• Access and capacity to transport bulky materials is an equity issue.
• Create stronger reuse markets.
CW-1: Circular economy action plan
DCED • Waste diversion rate Unfunded Priority PWU, local nonprofits and businesses, Clallam EDC, NODC
Equity and other considerations:
• Emphasize upstream waste and consumption reduction.
CW-2. PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION, SUCH AS USING LESS PLASTIC AND INCENTIVIZING RECYCLING AND COMPOST.
CW-2: Residential food waste diversion programs
Solid Waste Utility • Waste diversion rate
• % of food recovered
Unfunded Priority Clallam County solid waste advisory committee, Clallam EDC, local farms
Equity and other considerations:
• Consider partnerships with local farms and other entities to develop a viable market for composted materials before starting collection.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 76 of 86
City of Port Angeles
Climate Resiliency Plan: Implementation Plan 31
ID Action Name Lead Department(s)Indicators Affordability Funding status Funding sources Timeline Partners
CW-2: Commercial food waste diversion programs
Solid Waste Utility • Waste diversion rate
• % of food recovered
Unfunded Priority Clallam County SWAC, Commercial food enterprises, big box stores and franchises
CW-2: City and community sustainable purchasing
City Manager’s office, Green Team (multiple leads across COPA departments)
• Waste diversion rate
• Water consumption
Unfunded Priority Multiple COPA departments, community members
Equity and other considerations:
• Consider partnerships with local farms and other entities to develop a viable market for composted materials before starting collection.
CW-2: Plastic packaging reductions
• Waste diversion rate
• Water consumption
Funded Zero Waste Washington, local farms
Equity and other considerations:
• Continue to advocate at the state and federal level for policy change around plastics, Styrofoam, and other hard to recycle materials.
CW-2: Water consumption education / incentives
COPA Public Works Water Division
• Water consumption Unfunded Priority Energy Conservation Group, P&R, Golf courses, COPA School District, Dry Creek Water Association, Clallam County PUD
Equity and other considerations:
• Coordinate education and outreach at schools and public events.
• Need to be proactive about low flow season and protect groundwater when the snowpack is low.
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 77 of 86
Discussion Items
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 78 of 86
`
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 14, 2022
TO: Port Angeles Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Division Staff
RE: Staff Response to Planning Commission Proposed Amendments to Title 17
In an effort to assist the Planning Commission and move the amendment process forward, Planning Division
staff has prepared a memorandum addressing the amendments to Title 17 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code (PAMC) initially brought forward by former Planning Commissioner Stephen Luxton. This response
provides constructive feedback accompanied by historical context and the rationale behind staff’s analysis
of the Planning Commission’s unanimously adopted motion to move forward with the proposed Title 17
amendments. Each suggested amendment is provided an individual response and staff recommendation,
which staff can elaborate on at the September 14th Planning Commission meeting as necessary. The original
document suggesting the amendments is included in the appendix.
Changes to Chapter 17.08 – Definitions
➢ Rearrangement of dwelling type definitions
Staff understands the desire of the Commission to allow users of the PAMC to efficiently find entries
for commonly used terms, including different types of dwelling units. However, there is a benefit to
having all definitions for the multiple types of dwelling units allowed in the City in one section for
ease of reference and comparison. One possible solution would be to take a hybrid approach that
retains the definitions of different types of residential dwellings in Section 17.08.025 PAMC, while
adding corresponding definitions in the appropriate sections for each type of dwelling unit, so users
can find the definition regardless of which place they look first. For example, the definition for
Dwelling, single-household should remain in Section 17.08.025 PAMC, while a definition for “single-
household dwelling” is added to Section 17.08.095 PAMC. Either the definitions should be identical,
or one should reference the other in the manner commonly used in glossaries (e.g. See Dwelling,
single-household) to ensure that users obtain the same information regardless of where they look
for a definition in Chapter 17.08 PAMC.
➢ Take multi-family definition from Chapter 17.46 and add it to Chapter 17.08
The definition of “Multi-family housing” as used in Section 17.46.020 PAMC is derived from RCW
84.14.010 and is not meant to be applied to any other scenario in the City of Port Angeles other
than those activities undertaken pursuant to Chapter 17.46 - PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR
MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. As such, staff believes it beneficial to update the definition found in
Section 17.46.020 PAMC to reflect this status rather than updating the definition found in Chapter
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 58 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 79 of 86
P a g e 2
17.08 PAMC. A sentence could be added to the definition in Section 17.46.020 PAMC stating
something similar to “The definition of “multi-family housing” as included in this section is derived
from Washington State law, is for use only in relation to property tax exemptions as regulated by
Chapter 17.46 PAMC, and shall not be applied to other occurrences of “multi-family housing” or
similar terms elsewhere in the PAMC.”
➢ Add “corner shop” definition
Staff supports this proposal. As part of the amendment process, research can be done to provide
an updated definition based upon similar definitions from other municipalities within Washington
State.
Changes to Chapter 17.10 - R7, Residential, Low Density Zone
➢ Removal of pluralism for “single-household dwellings” and “duplexes”
Staff does not support this proposal. In municipal code language generally, “zones” are defined
differently than “property”. Whereas a single property might currently allow only one duplex due
to Comprehensive Plan land use standards, a zone is an overlay over multiple properties that
provides standards for design and use. More than one duplex is allowed in the R7 zone. In fact, there
are currently no minimum and maximum density standards for duplexes in the zone as a whole,
which is one reason why the use of the term is plural in Section 17.10.020 PAMC. The zone’s density
is meant to be controlled by the minimum and maximum lot sizes, dependent upon whether the lot
has access to an alley. In other words, use of plural terms in a list of permitted uses for a zone does
not imply that multiple structures of that type can be permitted on a single property in that zone.
Moreover, Section 1.04.020 PAMC makes it clear that use of the plural can connote the singular in
the PAMC, and vice versa. Given this rule, current language of Section 17.10.020 PAMC does not
imply that multiple duplexes can be permitted on one lot in the R7 zone, even though the zone
allows “duplexes” as a use. The same can be said for single-household dwellings.
➢ Defining minimum lot size for certain permitted uses in Section 17.10.020 PAMC
With the potential for multi-family development in the R7 zone, staff does not see this change as
being necessary. Table 17.10.050-1 PAMC already defines minimum lot area for all lots in the R7
zone, regardless of primary use. However, there is not currently a maximum net density specified.
Staff suggests changing the density maximum to 1 dwelling unit per 1,750 square feet of lot area,
allowing for 2 dwelling units on a 3,500 square foot lot and 4 dwelling units on a 7,000 square foot
lot. No change should be made to the minimum lot area.
➢ Addition of two duplexes
Staff does not support this proposal, but does support its intent regarding density of development,
which is to allow for four dwelling units on a single lot. Staff supports the allowance of multi-family
housing in the R7 zone and the provision of maximum density standards that will control the total
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 59 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 80 of 86
P a g e 3
number of units allowed per square foot of lot area.
➢ Addition of multi-family buildings containing up to four units on a 7,000 square foot lot
Staff supports this change and has also determined that this is already allowed for detached
structures. Section 17.21.30 PAMC, which establishes development requirements for cottage
housing development, currently defines each cottage as being counted as one-third of a dwelling
unit. There are no minimum lot size standards applicable to cottage housing, as long as the housing
complies with density standards of the zone. Cottage housing is also subject to design standards
including those related to separation, height, size, open space, and roofed porches for those
cottages facing open space.
Inclusion of multi-family housing of up to 4 units per 7,000 square feet would require basic design
standards to ensure that the use is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. These
standards could include height, open space, screening, setback, and location along certain street
classifications. Amending the PAMC to allow multi-family housing in the R7 zone would also require
a Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
RCW Chapter 84.14 – “New and Rehabilitated Multiple-Unit Dwellings in Urban Centers” was
recently amended to define multiple-unit housing to include a building or a group of buildings having
four or more dwelling units not designed or used as transient accommodations and not including
hotels and motels. Using this definition and a maximum density standard of one unit per 1,750
square feet would allow for a multi-family tax exemption to be utilized for the property, which would
help incentivize this type of development.
➢ Addition of “corner shop” to conditional uses
Staff supports this proposal. Adding commercial uses into Euclidean based residential zones will
ultimately improve quality of life for the residents of Port Angeles. This proposal is a small step in a
larger effort staff is interested in initiating to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
and rezone certain areas that are currently zoned residential and abut minor and primary arterial
streets to allow for more flexibility in use, including mixed use structures and a mix of uses on
separate properties. This could include the redesignation of some streets to extend mixed use
development corridors into primarily residential districts, thereby creating more commercial edges.
Staff suggests including this conditional use in all residential zones. The corner shop use will allow
for limited commercial uses on local access streets that abut collector arterials, or at any
intersection within an area zoned RMD or RHD. The use should be accompanied by design standards
that ensure it exists harmoniously with the surrounding residential development.
Changes to Chapter 17.11 - R9, Residential, Low Density Zone
➢ Removal of pluralism for “single-household dwellings” and “duplexes”
See the above discussion of this proposed amendment in the R7 zone, which is also applicable to
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 60 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 81 of 86
P a g e 4
the proposal in the R9 zone.
➢ Addition of “corner shop” to conditional uses
See the above discussion of this proposed amendment in the R7 zone, which is also applicable to
the proposal in the R9 zone.
Delete Chapter 17.23 – Commercial Arterial and its reference in Chapters 17.01 and 17.03
Staff supports this proposal. This is a scrivener’s error. The chapter has been removed, and was not
intended to appear in the PAMC, especially considering that standards applicable to the Commercial
Arterial zone are also contained in Chapter 17.20. Chapter 17.01 does need to be reviewed and changed to
address this as well. References remain in the PAMC for obsolete chapters that individually address
commercial zones, which have all been included in Chapter 17.20 – Commercial Zones. The intent of the
consolidated chapter addressing all commercial zones was to simplify the use of the PAMC for developers
of commercial property.
Delete Chapter 17.25 – Commercial Regional and its reference in Chapters 17.01 and 17.03
Staff does not support this proposal. The Commercial Regional zoning designation has been assigned to
areas within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) along the Highway 101 corridor that are not yet annexed into
the City of Port Angeles. While these properties are not currently zoned Commercial Regional, that zone is
their intended designation if the properties are ever annexed. The zone was intended to remain
independently designated outside of the other commercials zones covered by Chapter 17.20 because of
this unique situation. If any of the areas designated in the UGA are annexed at some point in the future,
retention of this chapter will ensure the City already has standards in place to govern development on those
properties.
Delete Chapter 17.45 – Infill Overlay Zone
Staff does not currently support this proposal. Staff intends to review and propose consolidation of the
City’s various overlay zones into a single overlay zone process during Phase II of the Building Residential
Capacity code changes. Until that occurs, the Infill Overlay Zone serves a unique and necessary purpose.
Replace occurrences of “apartments” with “multi-family building” throughout Title 17
Staff agrees with this recommendation and believes that eliminating or replacing the terms “apartment
building” or “apartment” throughout Title 17 in favor of using the term “multi-family dwelling” as defined
in Section 17.08.025 PAMC would be an improvement. This should increase flexibility, decrease redundancy
in use of terms, and eliminate the potential for confusion of terms by staff and developers. “Apartment” is
not defined in Chapter 17.08 PAMC, so it is unclear why it is currently distinguished from “multi-family
dwelling” in certain sections throughout Title 17.
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 61 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 82 of 86
P a g e 5
Appendix
Exhibit A: Original Suggestions Presented by Commissioner Stephen Luxton
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 62 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 83 of 86
Addition of commercial uses in residential zones
Add below definition to Title 17 - Zoning: Definitions “C”
Corner Shops
Corner shops are establishments such as cafes, restaurants, convenience stores, lounges,
coffee shops, food, vegetable and fruit stands and pubs developed on corner lots where streets
face on two sides. Corner shops are developed in residential zones to promote walkability,
community economic development, sustainability and health. No corner shop shall have a gross
floor area greater than 1000 sq ft. Corner shops shall not conduct business later than 9PM or
before 7:30 AM.
Add below Conditional Use in R7, R9 and R11
Corner Shops
Fixes and expansions of uses within the R7 zoning without density
increases - additions in red
17.10.020 Permitted uses.
A.Adult family home.
B.Single-household dwelling.Minimum lot size 5000 sq. f.
C.Small lot single-household dwelling.Minimum lot size 3500 sq. f.
D.Exempted home occupations.
E.Child care provider.
F.Group living.
G.Duplex.Minimum lot size 3500 sq. f.
H.Cottage Housing
I.Two Duplexes. Minimum lot size 7000 sq.f.
J.Multi-Family. Maximum of 4 units. Minimum lot size 7000 sq. f.
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 63 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 84 of 86
Fixes for the R9 - additions in red - Correcting plural uses
A.Adult family home.
B.Single-household dwelling.
C.Exempted home occupations.
D.Child care provider.
E.Group living.
F.Duplex.
G.Cottage housing.
Fixes to Commercial Zones/Block Frontages
When Building residential capacity was brought in, it overwrote three of the city’s six commercial
zones and repealed one. Now some of the commercial zones have their own chapter and others
don't. 17.20 was supposed to be a consolidated chapter to cover all 5 commercial zones.
Delete chapter 12.23: Commercial Arterial
Delete chapter 17.25: Commercial Regional
Delete references in 17.01 and 1703
This zoning does not exist anywhere and is not even on the City zoning map legend. It’s not
included in the new 17.20 zoning chapter. CR should be removed as a zone and deleted from
the code.
Infill Overlay Zone 17.45 - Pointless and uneeded
Delete Infill overlay zone 17.45
Our residential zoning already allow density higher than what could be achieved by utilizing this
overlay. Rendering it pointless.
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 64 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 85 of 86
Fixes to definitions 17.08
Instead of having all the different types of residential buildings under definition “D” Dwellings,
remove dwelling from in front of the building types and put them in the definitions page so they
are consistent with how they appear in the permitted uses, conditional uses and accessory use
tables throughout the rest of the code.
Take Multi-family definition from 17.46 and add it to 17.08 Definitions “M”
Multi-family is defined in 17.08 as three units or more and in 17.46 as four units or more.
Swap Multi-Family for Apartments everywhere in the entire code. Where an apartment house or
apartment building appears, swap from multifamily building.
September 28, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 65 of 65
October 26, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Page 86 of 86