Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1615 W 5th St - Building . CITY OF PORT ANGELES LIGHT DEPARTMENT 321 E. Fifth Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 (206) 457-0411 Site Address: ELECTRICAL PERMIT ~ Installed By: PERMIT NO. 07' o<f> DATE /z-/O-9G o READY FOR INSPECTION ~ WILL CALL FOR INSPECTION Phone: License Number: Owner/Business: Owner/Business Address: ~SIDENTIAL o COMMERCIAL o BASEBOARD KW _ o FURNACE KW --L.n- o FAN/WALL KW _ o HEAT PUMP KW ~ o SIGN o TEMPORARY SERVICE ~ PERMANENT SERVICE ~ NEW CONSTRUCTION o REMODEL o ADD/ALTER CIRCUITS o SERVICE UPGRADE/REPAIR o SPECIAL EQUIPMENT (LIST BELOW) DetailslDescription: Phone: Sq. Ft. o OVERHEAD SERVICE El UNDERGROUN SERVICE VOLTAGE: /20 .2 tB-SINGLE PHA E o THREE PHASE SERVICE SIZE 6!&? AMPS 3020 A-4:u..) ~ . W.S. No. SERVICE SIZE CAPACITY: o O.K. NOT O.K. ACTION REQUIRED: 0 CHANGE TRANSFORMER o INSTALL SERVICE POLE DATE ENGR. o CHANGE SERVICE WIRE o OTHER JD Ditch Inspection O.K. At W. ~ough-in/cover O.K. ![~~ O.K. to connect service o Final O.K. Site Add,eS) 0/S- CG/. .::,- ~ Installer: Sh u---: New Meters Permit/Receipt No. ~7'og Date: 2 -/0 -f c. . Notify Port Angeles ty Light by Street Address and Permit Numberwhen ready for inspection. Work must not be covered before inspection and O.K. for covering has been given by the electrical inspector in writing on either the Wiring Report or on the Building Permit. PHONE 457-0411, EXT. 224. ,# &0 crD. ~ NO OCCUPANCY OR USE ESTABLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT ? ~ ~r ___ -; ~ $ . de;:> Electrical Inspector WHITE - File by address YELLOW - file by number PINK - Top: Eng, Bollom, Customer OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC. Permit Fee GREEN - Top: Meter Dept.. Bottom: City Hall y . Site Address: Owner/Business Address: 'xl' RESIDENTIAL /0 COMMERCIAL o BASEBOARD KW _ o FURNACE KW _ o FAN/WALL KW _ o HEAT PUMP KW_ o SIGN DetailslDescription: CITY OF PORT ANGELES LIGHT DEPARTMENT 321 E. Fifth Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 (206) 457-0411 ELECTRICAL PERMIT ff PERMIT NO. ::< ~~ 7 . DATE 7-3/~ 7'~ o READY FOR INSPECTION license Number: ~WILL CALL FOR INSPECTION Phone: "'fit TEMPORARY SERVICE '5 PERMANENT SERVICE o NEW CONSTRUCTION o REMODEL o ADD/ALTER CIRCUITS o SERVICE UPGRADE/REPAIR o SPECIAL EQUIPMENT (LIST BELOW) '7J~r"'A.ij.~ Phone: Sq. Ft. ~ OVERHEAD SERVICE o UNDERGROUND SERVICE VOLTAGE: o SINGLE PHASE o THREE PHASE SERVICE SIZE AMPS . j W.S. No. SERVICE SIZE CAPACITY: o O.K. NOT O.K. ACTION REQUIRED: 0 CHANGE TRANSFORMER o INSTALL SERVICE POLE DATE ENGR. o CHANGE SERVICE WIRE o OTHER o Ditch Inspection O.K. o Rough-in/cover O.K. AJlnf\..b(l O.K. to connect service / I/'" 0 Final O.K. Site Address: - Permit/Receipt No. New Meters Date: . Notify Port Angeles City Light by Street Address and Permit Number when ready for inspection. Work must not be covered before inspection and O.K. for covering has been given by the electrical inspector in writing on either the Wiring Report or on the ilding Permit. PHONE 457-0411, EXT. 224. WHITE - File by address NO OCCUPANCY OR USE ESTABLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT $ OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC. YELLOW - file by number PINK - Top: Eng, Bottom, Customer L ,:)TJ.~ Permit Fee GREEN - Top: Meter Dept., Bottom: City Hall S3:83G- C: x{ Lji. PIONEER NATIONAL ar«w w..r. TITLE INSURANCE Los erect hwaIO as warn.(% w Fa..f for Record el Request of 4 TO John 8. i Gladys F. Pearce i 1116 Hest 4th Screec CLAZLA.4 COUNTY TREA.v4k1.. port Angeles. Na. 98362 EXCISE TAX EXEMPT DATE /9/1 1:9„.__, Isom LIMN Quit Claim Deed' (C0. WORM IRE GRANTOR the City of Port Angeles, municipal corporation far asdleassideeatireef two thousand and so/100 d.11ars (52,000.00) command nit dlaisies w John 8: and Gladys F. Pearce (800 tie k&o.iai den pal ied estate. skewed ia the Cosh al Clallam State of Washington I..leding say interest therein vhlch cruder easy hereafter acquire: All that portion of Lot 15, Block 129, is .sits of Port Angeles. described as follows: 8egia.tug at the northeast corner of said Lot 15, thence vest along she reetth Alas of said Lot 15. a distance of 43.23 feet; there* south 18 30' east, a distance of 136.43 feet to the east line of said Lot 15; thence north along the easterly lice of said Lot 15, a distance of 129.32 feet to ttse place of beginning: Except tbe northeasterly tutees (15) feet thereof: 4 Coc=a1ai.g 2,796 square feet, sore or less; of which 300 square feet, not* o r less. 1e retained; reesinder 2,496 square feet, sore or less. IN WITNESS RitEREOF. add cr.yaratioa has cowed this Li( to be (melted by its proper officers mid its ooeperaee d se be lowewte timed this day of GitY_.9l Lgs__ b is mayor ty Clark STATE OF WASHINGTON. t Casty d C�k� dx O■ this Mfg *rya m4y I 1 Qd Z. .briar( ..w. the o..krmb(.i.i. Newry rabic la end for the State of Washington. dilly eisra.Fsi.Ned and swan. pennoafly .pope =:.d Oo ivy CO wcA aid MAEIAU C. PAb'a?ISN es me knees to he the Mayor and City Clerk respectieety. (f CITY OF fir ,44 ,241 tie s_q.arams. that mewled the forgeable b.strosrot. and sct.we4deed tbe•nld I•ste...ese to be the fen gad wiestal ad ..f said die Ines deed id corporation, for e es and pmrpo es `yrl F4 rie N.:isytd, sad as cub stated that 74„I pea: aathariard to *menu the said inurement sod that dI t i erli :We .corporate sub of sad cRPerMia� Weems wry Ind d and official i begets afitd the day mad ye iitt abvte e Irdny Math* Sloe e/ It•u4eff rl.. tral i tcaPllteitELE.5 rnt fi27 •4,119 6*ign MEMORANDUM VarillOW July 28, 1992 TO: Ken Ridout, Pu• is Work Department -FROM: John Jimerson, r.. nning Department RE: Sexton House, 1.15 W. 5th Street We have completed our review of the Sexton House for compliance with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance and have found it meets the criteria setforth for development in previously altered environmentally sensitive areas. Attached is a copy of our findings for your information. The project may not be changed in any manner which results in the project not meeting the requirements of the ordinance. The conservation easement and /or deed restriction does not need to be completed before issuance of building permit, but should be completed before construction progresses too far. We would like to review the language of the easement /restriction. ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREAS PROJECT REVIEW DATE: July 28, 1992 PROJECT: Sexton House LOCATION: Lot -15, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles PROPOSAL: Construction of a single family home on the top of a marine bluff. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Section 15.20.070(B)(2) requires a minimum undisturbed buffer of 50 feet from the top of the bluff. Section 15.20.080(A)(5) allows for exceptions for areas that have been previously altered from its natural state if the criteria contained therein are met. Criteria a: The environmentally sensitive area was lawfully altered in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter and any state and federal laws at the time the alteration occurred. Response: The environmentally sensitive area has been filled in the past, which has created a new top of bluff. According to Polaris Engineering, the fill depth ranges from 6 to 10 feet and extends a horizontal distance of about 25 feet. New vegetation on the side of the fill consists of ground cover and dense shrubs including blackberry bushes. Since the City has no permitting requirements for grading and filling, we do not know precisely when the site was filled. According to Ken Ridout in Public Works, the fill was placed on site probably in the late 1980's and that the applicant has not added to the fill or extended the building site into the environmentally sensitive area. Thus the alteration was likely altered prior to the adoption of the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance. It is not known to having been done so in violation of any State and Federal laws in force at the time of the alteration. North of the site the ESA and buffer was altered much earlier than the site. A two car garage and a 20 foot wide paved alley were constructed and still exist. Criteria b: The alteration significantly disrupted the natural functions of the environmentally sensitive area. Response: The alteration changed the 40% slope to a nearly level slope and covered any natural vegetation that may have existed. While the sides of the fill have since revegetated with ground cover and shrubbery, the top of the site contains little vegetation thus exposing the soils to accelerated levels of erosion. Criteria c: The proposal utilizes to the maximum extent possible the best available construction, design and development techniques which result in the least adverse impact on the environmentally sensitive area. Response: The City Engineer has reviewed the development and drainage plans and has noted that he is not aware of any additional techniques available for minimizing impacts to the bluff. He has reviewed and approved a drainage plan which direct nearly all of the storm water away from the bluff thereby minimizing erosion and slide potential. The portions of the house nearest the bluff incorporate piers rather than full foundations thus reducing the amount of excavation and site disturbance that may otherwise occur. The Building Official has reviewed the plans and found the existing hill can support the house with the proposed foundations. A keystone retaining wall of about 2.5 feet will provide a more decorative structure than would a concrete or rock retaining wall. The Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance contains a reasonable use section for single family homes (15.20.080(A)(1) which contains a requirement that no more than 5,000 s.f. of the ESA buffer be disturbed. Although this criteria does not directly apply to the reasonable use exception for previously altered areas, the site disturbance of the buffer meets this criteria anyway. Plans submitted by the architect show that 4091 s.f. of the site and an additional 518 s.f. of alley right -of -way will be disturbed. Further, the property owner will be required to place a deed restriction and/ or conservation easement on the remaining 2300 s.f. of site within the buffer. Criteria d: The proposal incorporates the development standards of Section 15.20.070. Response: Consistent with the provisions contained in 15.20.080, the proposal involves a reduction of the buffer setback. Criteria e: The proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of this Chapter. Response: Discussed above are measures that have been incorporated which help to protect the environmentally sensitive area. CONCLUSION: The proposal meets the requirements for a reasonable use exception for environmentally sensitive areas that are previously disturbed. A building permit may be granted with the understanding that the project remains in compliance with the criteria discussed above. Prepared by: John Jimerson a t o +D OF ROAD 1.111___W 4 N. EDGE OF ALLEY M Li TOP OF :CUFF li 729 K o j cq 8 q 7 L i C S. EDGE ALLEY Z X2 9 TOP OF BLUFF *BAS i ON FIELD SURVEY 6/22 *VERIFIED 7/15/92 H CALE 30 TOP OF BLUFF c ti N ST DWG: 5LDWG C of pORT 4 o �N E MEMORANDUM r 321 E FIFTH P 0 BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362 a °8L,C WO��S PHONE (206) 457 -0411 July 17, 1992 TO: City Manager, Mayor Halle ;rid City Council FROM: Public Works Department 1� RE:' Surplus and Sale of City 0 ed Property in Block 129 TPA, Adjacent to Fifth Street at Highland Drive ISSUE: Should the City surplus and sell property to the owner of Lot 15, Block 129, TPA, for expansion of their building lot? BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS: The owner of Lot 15 in Block 129 has requested that the City sell an unused portion of city -owned property to increase their lot coverage to allow construction of a single- family residence. In May, 1982, the City sold a portion of unused Highland Drive right -of -way to the previous owner of Lot 15, Block 129. In doing so, the City reserved a 300 square foot portion along the top of the bluff for public purposes. That sale allowed for building on the lot, although it was slightly sub- standard at 6700 square feet. The single family standard is 7000 square feet. The building plan submitted by the new lot owner exceeds the 30 percent lot coverage allowed for a single family residence and the owner is requesting approximately 2000 square feet of additional area. The request was presented to the Real Estate Committee. The Committee concurred with the proposed sale and recommended a sale price of $2.00 per square foot. We reviewed the request with the property owner who has changed the configuration of the building site and requested that the City reconsider the sale price. The proponent has requested the City accept a sale price of $1.00 per square foot for the following reasons: The City will restrict the use of the property to be used for landscaping only. The area to be planted, watered and maintained by the owner at the owner's expense. No structures or hard surfacing will be allowed. r City Council RE: Surplus Sale Page 2 The landscaped area will be an enhancement to the City and will reduce maintenance costs to the City for cutting the existing grass and weeds on city -owned property and right -of -way. The area is an uneconomic remnant with limited value except to the adjacent owner. Proponent will submit a sketch of the building site in time to be presented at the Council meeting. •RECOMMENDATION: Based on the property owner's reasoning of the restrictions that the City will place on the use of the property, we recommend that the City Council declare the property surplus because the property is considered an uneconomic remnant to all except the adjacent owner, and authorize the sale of the property to thq owner of Lot 15 for $1.00 per square foot, or $2,000.00. Action by motion of the City Council to declare the property surplus is appropriate Rid=ut, Propel' Manager CC- surplus buTuueTd:03 saauT6ug 'l.T3 A 4somuax Aaeo °3 ;nTq wos; i 2M2 sMOT3 aoe ;.xns ;oa.ITP TTegs buTpe16 a4TS °Z uoz;ons ;suoo buz.xnp ;gnTq sano MoT; saq.eM aoe ;.zns 4uanasd 04 Lsessaoau S2 paTTe ;suT aq TTegs To.I4uo0 uoTsosg °T :uoz ;oa;o.Id 33nTe so; sa ;oN ppy 'S °abpa 144nos Arne buT ;sTxa go uotsua ;xa aq TTegs i2MOATsp 30 abpa q ;noS °butgszxa suTOC abpa usagJsoN 144pTM 2 CaTT2 TTn3 04 TT fN3 go pua wo.I; .fade; TTegs 144PTM ;Tegdsy •.Ia ;eM aoe3.Ins uTea.uoo 04 „A„ %T aq TTegs' IaTT2 o; £I2MOAT1Q 'f7 °;zw.Iad aITnbas TTTM AeM go ;q6-p uT sasn ;xTg 1 2M 30 a.gbzg uT pa44Twsad ION sT e 26ea5.6* pesodxg °pag0e442 p.xepue ;s /C4TD sad aq TTeus AeM go 4g5T? uT_IeMaATSQ °Z pagoe ;;.e sT uoT4eso4sas pue TTT ;Coeq .IO3 p.Iepu2 ;s A4TO °spsooas AVM W0.23 uoT4eTnoTeo sad 9 °£6T °xosdde sT 4uTOd uoT4oauuoo aga. 4e uoT4enaTg °q.xn ;soN aq; go g4nOS 15'9 xo.Idde pa ;eooT sT (j) uzesQ w.zoa.S °114S 4saM_ uT uTesp- wsa4s 0. ab.IegosTp TTegs buTdTd uzesQ sa1.4n0 pue uzesQ gouass- °T 6ZT CTS ST 40Z 6ZZ• Pue £ST9' s.zwsad 1 44S 4sOM £Z9T uo4xas 4.xo9 s4uawwop s)soM 3I'I2fld s4uawwoD MaTAad xmo sos -aa .zaauTbua FO •a'd 'AggzoM ax AapD *ST 402 3o ggzou AaTTP ell; qp gsTxe oq sasPao gaazgg ggf, uioz3 gouaq poi TuuTbTzo at'', °uoTgsanb uT sgoT aqq oq quaOPCpP SgsTxa gouaq zaMoT ou ;Pqq pauTuzagap uoTgpbTgsanuT .n0 'UOTgPOOT TpuTbTZO .no z941P pInoo goTgM pagsTxa gouaq zaMOT P 3T auTuizagap O. 'Z66T 'ST kTnr uo pagaTduzoo SEM La/vans TPuoT;TPpP UP '.ZauMO qoT agg zOJ goagTgozp 'AaTPH uITI 3o gsanba. agq W °Z66T 'aunt uT Mazo 4gTo agq Aq /an.zns uoTgPooT y uodn pasEq sT euTT ;3niq 3o dog aqs °qoT ATzagsea quaoPCpa pup paoua.a;az agq uo 33nTq 3o dog alp buTgoTdap buTMp.p buTzaauTbua UP sT pagopgw Kds 6ZT xOOTi 'ST 40a s ;TUIT'i dgd zo3 UOTgPOOZ 33n[S 3o dos :au UOTSTATQ buTzaauTbUa 'sxzoM oTTgnd :wOUd 1 -E4 ](,A; LnG 0.v)! ti;���!iti 1 l i r 0.; queuigapdau buTuupTd :OZ f f i Z66I 0 Z inr i1 f Z66T LT ATnr iL r; u a 11 .,�IaLL r± [1 )J L J j ltt'O-LSt (903) 3NOHd S l b bO M 3 i Z9£86NOIDWIHSHM'S3139NH.L Od OSII XO9 0 d HLdlzl 3IZE ivaa ®IiIIkkI F to fldod 1° ---4--: i \„777/ i r %i j 1 r J SALE JO TOP OF BLUFF *BAS ON FIELD SURVEY 2 *VERIFIED 7/15/92 __I2 S 1 N /N) N 0 3D 60 90 DWG 51.DWG 75 g;; MEMORANDUM June 30, 1992 TO: Gary Kenworthy City Engineer FROM: John Jimerson, Associate Planner RE: Sexton House Review We are in the process of reviewing the Sexton House for compliance with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance. In reference to Section 15.20.080(C) PAMC, a single- family dwelling located in an ESA must utilize to "the maximum extent possible and best available construction, design and development techniques which result in the least adverse impact on the environmentally sensitive area Mr. Haley has noted that the bluff is protected with the proposed drainage and runoff plans and by placing the majority of the structure on elevetaed platforms. In addition to erosion control facilities that you are requiring, can you recommend any other design or construction techniques that would further minimize the impact the bluff? Are you aware of any aspect of the current design that may be detrimental to the bluff? p k r r--^ o f T_- .541) S 5 .z 7 i I[�. j �C r .rte c�`�— `a -V tc) aes,,c or y I I 4 l ru Rli u. 1' 1' m I, _;cn� uli CD o r-- fill I�;I C) J II9 I1i /AN-NN'NN'' Li_ W I-1- Z I II: 0 Ili 'ilp Q i'III M liiii!( C C.) /Ns, N/ C"—) i (1)SV I I THE JUN 2 4 ARCHITECTS 0 PLANNERS 0 INTERIO ;RS 1123 11TH AVENUE, SUITE 402 HONOLULU, HI 96816 (808) 735 -2992 FAX (898) 735 50 rutff 113 SOUTH VALLEY STREET PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 (206) 452 -3871 FAX�(2)12 4 t CEP LI S c June 23, 1992 Mr. John Jimerson City of Port Angeles P.O. Box 1150 Port Angeles, WA 98362 Dear Mr. Jimerson: _,.The attached calculation sheet is drawn on the map drawn by the Engineering office. Although we have expressed a concern on the placement of this line, at this point to expedite the approval of this information, we have based our information on this map. It shows a 4210 Square Foot impact into the buffer zone of the 50 ft. setback off the bluff. We have explored other solutions to the residence, and due to the placement of the line and the setback we have found no reasonable alternative. As you can see from the map, if we place all the proposed setbacks on the site (zoning environmental), that 800 square feet of area remains. This is not a buildable site under this arrangement. As indicated in our drawings for the construction, the residence uses the best construction techniques, which results in the least amount of impact on the ravine. We have demonstrated this by involving a soils engineer from the beginning; developed drainage plans and runoff plans in excess of the City standards; and our structural system lies in the buffer and not in the ravine, although the lot extends into the buffer. The building design respects the site by placing the majority of it's structure on elevated platforms, allowing major landscaping to be planted on the site. We do not cause an adverse impact on the stability of the ravine. In fact due to our focused runoff plan we protect the ravine from the current uncontrolled runoff. The construction only removes the wild grass and weeds in the area of the construction, the ravine is left undisturbed. New landscaping will be placed in the area of construction, it will be native plants and consistent with the types of soils present. Concerning the AREA of the lot, according to a letter dated August 16, 1991 from Ken Ridout to Pioneer Title and subsequent conversations since then, the small portion of the property retained by the City for future trail needs, can be used for 1 requirements of City Zoning codes. This includes lot coverage. With this small parcel the lot is a full city lot or 7000 square fee If we en be of any further assistance please call. S nc re k A I ji 0 by Raley The T41 Network Architects *Planners *Interiors 911j \lf \GSRtxt \Citysex.623 2 o AN 1 1,,, r /0 lc,/ 4',..*- V "I.,, t.V. '0'' 7 i kt :4„: k j k s 69 ,Z' <0 OF pORT 4 41Q CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 E Fifth P 0 Box 1150 PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362 PHONE (206) 457 -0411 A £aNH G June 19, 1992 Tim Haley TRH NETWORK 113 South Valley Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 RE: Sexton House Dear Tim: The purpose of this letter is to follow up my June 16th letter to you on the Sexton House with some additional comments pertaining to zoning and environmentally sensitive area ordinance (ESA) requirements. In reference to the site plan dated 6/2/92 which contains lot coverage calculations, please be advised that only that property on the building lot itself can be used in determining allowable lot coverage. I understand you are working with Ken Ridout to determine if it is possible to obtain the 1920 s.f. to the west. If title is obtained and the 1920 s.f. is merged with the lot, then that area can be included in the lot coverage. I do not understand the reference to the 7,000 s.f. original property. Only property that is currently within the lot can be used toward lot coverage calculations. Please clarify for us how the lot coverage requirements are met. Note that the location of the top of bluff on the 6/2/92 site plan is inconsistent with the location identified by the City Engineer on a recent survey. The official location is the one identified by the City Engineer. In addition to those items discussed in my June 16th letter, we need for you to supply evidence as to how the proposal meets the criterium contained in 15.20.080(A)(1)b of the ESA ordinance. This criterium requires the applicant to demonstrate that there is no other reasonable alternative to develop the buffer. Reasonable alternatives in this case may include building a smaller house and locating the house as close to the street, away from the bluff, as permitted in the RS -7 zone. If you have any questions in these matters, don't hesitate to contact me at 457 -0411 ext. 176. Sincerely, l Jo Jimerson As ociate Planner oF PoRrgHC% f tgaft CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 E. Fifth P O Box 1150 PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362 PHONE (206) 457 -0411 P C4 NN% June 16, 1992 Tim Haley TRH Network 113 South Valley Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 RE: Sexton House Dear Tim: We are in the process of reviewing the Sexton House proposal for compliance with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance. As you are aware, the site is located within an environmentally sensitive area and its associated buffer. Section 15.20.080(A)(1) allows development of a single family home in a buffer if the criteria listed on the ordinance are met. One of the criterium requires that the disturbed buffer area not exceed 5,000 square feet. Please submit to us a site plan which shows the property lines, the top of bluff as determined by the City Engineer, the 50 foot buffer from the top of bluff and the disturbed area. Also provide the calculations showing that less than 5,000 s.f. of the buffer will not be disturbed. You also need to let us know how the bluff and the undisturbed portions of the buffer will be protected from disturbance. We are still in the process of reviewing the proposal with respect to the criterium contained in 15.20.080(A)(1)(c) to ensure the construction will not have a detrimental effect on the bluff. We will let you know if any other concerns arise during our review. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call me at 457 -0411. Sincerely, r 1/i d! ohn Jimerson Associate Planner poia Polaris Engineering and Surveying, Incorporated 111 East Third Street Suite 10 Port Angeles Washington 983. (206) 452 -5393 w FAX: (206) 457 -9319 1 1 i® 1'9L August 16, 1991 PORT /ANGELES j PLANNiNC OEPT\;,TMEN1 Mr. Gordon Sexton 202 Sea View Drive Port Angeles, WA 98362 .Re: Lot_15, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles Dear Mr. Sexton: On August 8, 1991, I observed the excavation of backhoe test pits on the referenced property. The purpose of the review was to determine if any unsuitable fill had been placed on the property and, if so, the extent and nature of the fill. A total of four pits were completed; a sketch indicating the location of the test pits is attached hereto for your information. It was found that a substantial amount of unsuitable fill had been placed on the property, in the area of the steep bank running along the northeast portion of the site. Test pit #1 had approximately 10 feet of debris and organic fill over very compact gravelly fine sand (till). Test pit #2 had 7 feet of debris and organic fill over compact sand and gravel. Test pit #3 consisted of native gravelly sandy loam topsoil over slightly compact gravelly sand. Test pit #4 had 4 feet of fill over compact sand and gravel. Based on the excavations and the site conditions observed, I estimate that the fill area extends approximately 25 feet westerly from the edge of the bank and ranges from 10 feet in depth at the edge of the bank to 6 feet at the west edge of the fill. The material below the fill is substantial, compact sands and gravels, suitable for dwelling construction. -Two methods,of site development are appropriate in the fill area. The unsuitable material may be removed and replaced with structural fill or caisson type footings may be installed. If caissons are used, the recommended bearing pressure is 2000 psf, the recommended lateral bearing is 400 psf, and frictional resistance is allowed and may be combined with bearing resistance as set forth in Section 2908(j) of the UBC. Increases for depth below the plane of the native material is permitted as set forth in Table 29 -B of the UBC. Please,contact this office if you have any further questions regarding this site. Sincerely, Polaris Engineering and Surveying, Inc. p M. e enovic, P.E. Enclosure cc: File JN 91300 The TRH Network w /enc. 20' ALLEY P/L �0 TEST PIT 41 OQ r h `2\' TEST PIT 42 6 f 7 o TEST PIT 43 9 r j P p AVERAGE GROUND SLOPE 15 17. THIS AREA P/L EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EX'SIN& POWER POLE OIILOC APPROX F I FTH 5TKEET C/L TEST PIT LOCATION SKETCH RENSCTS SCALE 1 LOT 15, BLOCK 121 T.P,A, 91300 CJENT GORDON SEXTON SHEET Pw n 202 SEA VIEW DRIVE I 1 OF PORT ANGELES, 95362 U PAR1 APPLICATION INFORMATIO (To be completed by the applicant) it jjkl 4 1992 Applicant PO ANGELES Name: "W 1r gt,511V-V- If PLANNING DEPT' Mailing Address: 13 C. 9t'07\ 4 tLI Daytime Phone Number: 462 m?)-1 1 Owner Name: vsAv-s Svelb Mailing Address: t 5 Vit't 4 44.ir Ws1 lkits54k1WviCO Daytime Phone Number: Property Street Address: tteig OIM Legal Description: Lor 410 etho t'2 itoisiver- 1 Size of parcel (sq. ft.): 7660 /t Zoning Designation: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Project Briefly describe the project proposed for this site: F.e$11750(.45 City of Port Angeles Environmentally Sensitive Areas Application, Page 2 PART III AFFIDAVITS (7'o be completed by the applicant) As nt /I, EA csi'1i affirm that all the information included as part of this appl cati• c all associated drawings are accurate and true to the best of my knowledge. WZI 1■• LK 1 1) 117 t Date Owner I a"; cx S e x+r, that I am the owner of the property where the project proposed in this application is located and that I authorize this application. Owner 0' Date C:\WPICAIESA.APP City of Port Angeles Environmentally Sensitive Areas Application, Page 4 June 04, 1992 City of Port Angeles City Planning Department JUN 4 1992 Attn: John Jimerson P.O. Box 1150 Port Angeles, WA 98362 ATTACHMENT TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS APPLICATION 1. a. The Single Family residence will be placed to the South of the man -made cut created by the vacated right of way for the street called "Highland Drive The footings for the home are to be•_drilled caissons. The closest footing to the cut will be 30 feet from the natural ravine line. The location of the structure will not increase the erosion or landslide area. Precautions have been taken, such as a trench 4 -5' deep along the West side of the site for collection of water run -off; all roof drains will be taken by tight line to fifth street for distribution into the storm sewer. All concrete and asphalt areas will have catch basins for collection of run off to avoid run off on to the bank area. b. The residence has been designed to meet all requirements of the UNBC for seismic loading. As well the site was tested for footing depths by Polaris Engineering. c. As indicated in a. above the surface drainage has been addressed. Subsurface water was not discovered as apart of the earlier testing. The tests were done during the FALL of the year. As a precaution however we have included in the plans a 4 -5' trench drain at the West side of the site for collection of the potential surface and subsurface water, prior to it getting to the ravine. d. This is not a flood prone area. e. The existing vegetation on the HILL SIDE will not be tampered with. The Contractor has been given strict instructions not to impact the edge of the bluff with any over burden and not to clean anything off of the hill except for the immediate top. f. The owner purchased this piece of property for it's view. One of it's views is down the ravine. There is no intention to disturb the ravine. g. The structure is to the South of the slope. We will not impact the slope. 1 2. There are no impacts to mitigate. 3. There is no additional information. 4. a. No flood areas b. Polaris Engineers did the attached report. c. See b. d. No Wetlands e. See b. f. No Marine Bluff i Sincere,, T' o- h, aley The TR Ne work tms M_ \LF \GSR91 \TXT \SEX— CITY_604 2 EIVIOFIANDUliti p pl TO tFttyp tamp 5 D TWICOPEN TIM JUN i 3 I992. FROM: 7-11 DATE: t 1 (12,. 9.1 HAND DELIVER SUBJECT: Liar *1 5 j i TOTAL PAGES Plosss wt7 M it* efitrisi var. tort ts #104itvarr am larePrr 1? frtO is°1114130 15 Or traMt5kr m 2511z651 VOITN clit? tiViMar 117401.3r ppaMS inOsfr WO, ta k J4 eNtik9 ZSM rio*It'S ei*ITY1011•ArtV t.041\11. 1 ii42(6teSE cria-145K-Avti (Ate is ot soi.co Or. Iv Itraeopvg7 10 5 .20 .080 c,1 4ir'$16410-ifivA; tm otm 4 TOPilitt• lb 144457 titomto Dew;14741101);0. fpx\ikve Ft NI, op.tisizot et, —5 61.) F5 eitv 214 stiAblZ VVIA4 tecistoRAWr Coi> 1S Mi142a3S led5-ttifrct■I 5000 WOW'S FIE 011 ri;OPKIg iS t i DrODWIWAS e)* N\ITtAb cwS17-octtot teriFiNaeS (*CAA- ffi* 55M01191 t) +Wine efie gopftie- 141*(01).-pAvm,151.0pmeLT PotriVcr titaiwa.ef144F St4 9 au ID au lavoi ot4to. 4A tilis paWOrtOrc,€) t S* V31 IffiV" 1 Cate\fifir The MP. Network ARCHITECTS PLANNERS INTERIORS 113 South Valley Street Port Angeles. Washington 98362 Telephone: (206) 452-3871 FaX 1123 11th Avenue, Suite 402 Honolulu, Hawaii 96816 Telephone: (808) 735-2992 Fax (808) liAlf‘offIce\tact‘offlceVeso.frin F ir40% S tr;;:,,,,,."' L 61 n u; 7 .....f. ..r.,„ (1 'LL• aiti 3 992 1 1 3. i 1 I i I I '----...-r-7—=—.--Sly—.--.....,,. I 1 Tril 1 Il 1 co i'w I N 4 i 4 i 1 i 4, 1.4% t 1 i 11 ii-': I i L 1 ,:-.-e I h 4-.• i e.--. r. r -i- .....:i! 1: °°••:.7.1t4 4 --‘icarcq tr-1-°-inz.li".;.;.:.7.1-:. -"k ...1,-:.,- 5 i i H F..L i .1 p ;,_..-7 ILI E_E 1:---.:-. n .1-- s -2,•.-'- t kFx.t.: .1-, 2 ,_,..i.,.. -..±t ,..v, s' 1 i -t:r.•••—.------, 1 V !.I.! -1 1 0 i'"-.4, 5 o lit I o i lf•-• ..a I i 1 :"V• 1 so i .t !.'4,3 'R :ii:/: X i 1 k 4 -a 4c0 V -2 2: ./.44 .P t •-s; ,e 4 r 1 1 ji,p,''. L.,, 4, .......=',00. ,.....z.,--;'' *J ...-;-,4k.l.vr ./1 '74 to likc- ...cez 1 44 i 4-3- P 3 1; t, 't 3116‘k Gs r 4 1 1 2; .44 O i. -a/ I.t. a ii. A ■.R. 1 C 1 4.,•0" .1 g .a. a 2 t ir g L. Pt 'r.f •'1..2 -Al I •3' t g *I 1 .E ef s ...1 2 1.•' 3. '-‘3. ki I,' "V r' '44... 4 0"-' 0 1 i kJ ssl 1 it I '3,3 ••C' 'SS "-W.,} if. -t, Y ti 3 -I -;.i 11. p si! A 1 t4. :ik 1 1,":";:= STREET R E E T 1 ...ral..-......• J., c• n.a t roe* d lit 11.-1119 4( A r. t• ,I I: frio■•::, t s: 'Il a tuutti.. Itttni.11F4 ,r ll dr .7 11 1 I a t i ri........._-. WRY NOM ,141..a4 c p ,....1 4 .4 1 11.43 flirt ST '"7. v I 1,t k ,,O..3 3 1. .•-•."%•'•il!"A ui ...S f� �.A is y} yV .A ii i M �r n" n 1 sr C _.,::,..y,,,,,A,, r CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 E. FIFTH P.O. BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362 •C) K f) PHONE (206) 457-0411 Pioneer Title Company 204 S. Lincoln Street 1 Port Angeles, WA 98362 ATTENTION: Connie RE: Lot 15, Block 129, TPA Dear Connie: In response to your request, we have reviewed the background information concerning Lot 15, Block 129 of the Townsite of Port or Angeles. We find that when the City sold the right-of-way the lot in 1982, we considered it a buildable lot of record. This was approved by the Planning Commission and accepted by the City Council. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes is attached for your use. The City has retained a small portion of the property for future trail needs. This retained portion would not affect the building site because it lies within the area that would normally be used a for setbacks. The lot is a buildable lot of record, with the understanding that the owner will be required to provide soils analysis and foundation design for the residence because of the proximity to the ravine. The portion of the property the City retained can be utilized to meet the setback requirements for the residence; however, no structure of any kind may be placed on the City -owned portion. If you need additional information, please call me at 457 -0411, ext. 122. Sincerely, Jack N. Pit is E. Director of A1i`•51, orks Ken R;dout, Deputy Dir-ctor AUD \P i o.'lee r. KDR r.r,f r t 4 et If) i' A a ,...1.,, .11 4..., f• .3 ....i,.:. ..,:s;.•=1:ie.V., tiz-n'ip .■,P 'W'r•-*,..,;', r.',:,-,•. P,,. 7., -7 t tf.... t'-f:''''-' 1'''' 4" 7.:" jr ----Ali. '..-4 11 'LA 10 P•11 sel Aull■ Aiial 11.-: 4 g ...1 s' 111/ DO Id 14 al 0 0 0 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 46) IF,L a .4 Planning Department •••1 g 107 North Oak Street Port Angeles, Washington November 25, 1981 ir ;4 r im 0 0 •.1 ‘C Id PETITIONER I John: B;' Pearce 4 •.4 r a +4 Li 0 11 1 PROPOSAL:" ..4 -,‘....3 I 1 f$ 10 Request to purchase a triangular portion of Lot 15, Block '.0 129, Townsite of Port Angeles, with the east/west leg being s■ 43.25.•feetk,, the north/south leg being feet 129.32 f and the t -1 hypItenuse"-being;136.43 feet; containing a total of 2,594 4 r. 4.'1 -':.1 Is T... IT square feet. ---d---- t c, i 0t- tt .1' t: ••:y. 7 -.'1- 1., 4`.- 5.•;CL,.* 1 2:1, 2. EX/STING COND/TIONS:?:: 1 s •Ti 1";;%,- Z 4 ,"4-. ,:4,.,r, 4'. „.4. The former Highland Drive property bisect Block 129 Town- s s•-- J. "s"-_,...4.-- .1 r ;.V.: 4. '.E..“: 1 ,:r •-i• of Port Angeles,", between Fourth and Fifth Streets. It :z-: 0 r 1 1 v-- 7.- is approximately30-5,feet•in.wicithr: and: during the period when" 4 s :...f; A it was used'.for a street; Ilic;hland Drive ran par Illel to i s"'* c the top edge of-theYbluff 'overlooking Port Angeles, Harbor. li ---I IX. q‘ 1..,, i The 30-foot i strip has been abandoned for street purpor..es, and •-.-0,;' .,-„„•:i-f.-3`',Vtt,i only reranante:rof roadbed remain:' The specific portion 1 il.- ,„;3:-- "="zis „s‘v.: -e,,,,y' -A-A- requested for -purchase by the applicant is what had formerly,.' -"''r- -•1/4., l t.' 'L 4 .1 '.v i4.- been the northeast ,approximately one-half of Lot 15, Block 129.. -'''0 1 ir., C' .1 Lots 16 to 20; re owned to the east,- are by the City and were 4. ,;,::".1 .....4:-,7•N s used as a. fill site during the construction of L./.D. 193.". W .`..\1 •=e5P,.--I 7 ',V s *7- rk 1, -.7 -A.,,,, ';:-'e, :..t• v •ait.3.`,.)1e 4 r. -4-;'-k• 'i- 3. DEPAP.IMENT CO:.LMENTSi f, 'r rk k.:`‘ f .tk, -',',•:;.;....,76s,,tri,;:••;-,--t-2,Xts,•, iff•41‘; 0) :k '.:"V''''6 4 1kq4 -i i,S-t: S 3lei‘ift s k''''. V ••,.;:t•Y Public siorki: ,..4.., The Public Works Department, advises that the4:,--•.tel.s-4, 4. f Lot 15 b h Itt --,,,t,,, -'''..4. 10 i „;„v(i4kZIM,„"wi portlonst o requested to e, Dlirc asedt. 4)//-q z,•,,- c 1:4 4 ',,;,,..,;4%,V„,, :5: L k. was. purchased bi,, Cityln 191 nd a' for. az1w2-tz-- ••••:i .3,-;.: 3 3 "4C 4' :1 3 .4 "■:',1 3 r l' ie-' 4 I _Z period as a right-of-way s.'f=The• const .irr 444, ,i„,..7 OE .0 b't 4 ■'1' ii? ra ,,,4 4 ,g4...*,,F.,.. ..4, i:" .I .D. 191, in 1971-1972 opened UpVIC"„. Str A eet; between, Fourth';',-iT* 4 i .7 t• ,...A..j.k, 4 T.'4F. t z 10;6 .4..,tt,;,.... 1 4.. and Fifth and' eliminated thi3 need' for Ilighland,Drive•;.?„whictiP'- -...„,,,,"~c„.4 1;4, •,4 5. .,74, s'',&...,?: ,v..., s ,,,,,,t-..‘4". was near, the.' bluff line and had a_ ub.'3,tandard-4,•-right-of,-;„wak„, ,,s,„4,---,..,:ice-,'.V.'''-;'..- i....-•-: w ...--is- e... 4 idth The re are no4utili ties "locatedciwithin-, thel`i,portioir, of 1, "4t 4 L ..•••,4',"-•"- 7 1 A:1•3, 4 ,-.sy "47''''''-'i iCV,reL.,_,,Aitx ,...,'.1- t,. 40.,_ •._•:.".•••t••••••.'•' 2 "i -4 -Zt. '4 ,11---4.:•,, <4 -r‘r- -,04 I.A.1- t,. 1.-- '.."-"P -4- -..4- P p -'0T P f.." V ,t e'- 4' •.f...... F` AA...40'4:TC' .if '.3' 4 h. n3 t; 4 t+,-.L .4 1; s 43 3. 3 .;,11. 44 .....,w 4,1l.,,,...4^„ 2 l 2;: Iz E• 4 7, x• 0 r, ,z-e. 1 1- .4 .t. 1 v....1 e: 7■ 4t*,- s ....4. '3 '.3;1•L 1 :,v t,':..4".,i ry 1-11';‘...7. !.7_ i-„, :-A ofr-....or,.- -.•!-k-,,,,, 1 b tL RR.. y i •v •�nr �'•.ti 4�' P S t w'.n.� �5+• 2 "R .1 /r r r •t g i ,r S,,, .s r ti t4 ..17 n',.,`: b: a•t" -t ��ri.. f n 4 ,L: �;.,;ii +a•:�t�..r�Jpr i1•"' ?.+Ar;.;: .lysr u2 are f,i "t 1 t I S o f t aS. r X4' tilt .5 ;g r "rti.' °•f' i Y r p is tg. K 2/ S a 2 assts.i» ro k'.- :A Property purchase Ai, w :•:;,,t-. request ii o i. Page 2 ✓M1,, r.1 11 •---0',i,,,` Lot 15 sought to be purchased; and it is unlikely the need Ir. :t to reopen the street will occur. c: `w.vi-- Light Department: The Light Department has no facilities in the portion of Lot 15 sought to be pur- chased and has no objection to the sale; ,-7 :1 q nor does the Light Department require retention of utility tva o fi x q a m a r :q easements. -F F a Police: The Police Department has no objection to the sale y �Hr� K. L of the portion of Lot 15 sought to be purchased. a Fire: The Fire Department sees no outstanding problem with ,P-^ access to adjacent lots should the portion of Lot 15 ti be sold; nor does it see any impact as to future ser- .-1. ,r A 'wr' vice to the area. J Parks: Since Highland Drive is proposed as part of an urban bicycle /hiking trail, the Parks and Recreation De- 10 partment recommends the retention of 15 feet back -z from the top of the bluff. 44" 4. IMPACTS: 4 Traffic: Highland Drive, which occupies the portion of Lot 15 sought to be 5 purchased, is substandard both in width and road condition. According to the Public Works De- partment, the opening of "K" Street has resulted in more convenient access to the immediate area and eliminated the need for continued use of Highland Drive. Sale of •i v.- ot 15 occupied by Highland Drive would the portion of Lot not have an adverse effect on the traffic patterns in :zr the area. Utility Services: There are neither underground nor overhead utilities located in the portion of Lot 15 sought to be 4 410 purchased; therefore, no adverse effects will result if thLs parcel is sold. a'W -.'y o. j`r'!t} °'�k fC r S M r 3`" k11n q, nJty 7- asP.'y v. F ?4'' ig,i, r r' ,y Y y r i 5�.. f ..,1. ,"y fi. ti 4 ts.�,1.,' r. .3 -u..S.. ...Z0 q, 4,#`a [}ar•*`a •11 x'. t tf *'Z. ,z .1 .7 Y 9y ,,r ,t •d t a M ,1.. f 4 y `∎V 1' .5'•�t f4 k 1 t ..r yl i ;--,;'-t.-„ f 4 t 4 k 1f z- ':44 l' yt lt A 1. f f .n'4 ,'IC ..i 1 ��4 �i:tirh r. "t20 s" H r x.: 1 7 ..'0'1- Sdr ^,ty •I• tJ r m Property purchase.' es w request u o Page 3 O 7 ;j w °o T Development Patterns: Returning the parcel to Lot 15 would 1 74 a e e nable the Petitioner to acquire a standard Townsite lot a M which could be improved with a single family residential r structure. It will not, however, change the basic over all residential character of the area i; '0 8 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: c ?dM Sale of this portion of Lot 15 does not conflict with the Cir- c a culation Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. However, the Is f 4111 t Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan, adopted in 1978, con tains a recommendation to utilize the portion of Highland Drive located in Lot 15 as a part of a hiking and bicycle 1 Z trail. f M 6. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: a f :r 0 Since this portion of Lot 15 was _not_s ac ui for right-oaf-way, p g y, the present action is exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act. 7. DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: .-';',-,-,-"2. ='f The request is to acquire a triangular portion of Lot 15, 4";,: Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles, containing approxi- mately 2,594 square feet, which was acquired by the City a a. in 1918 and subsequently used for a substandard right -of- way. There are neither overhead nor underground utilities .'T crossing the portion of Lot 15 sought to be :4, 9 g Purchased. Nrt Selling the parcel, as requested, will not adversely affect 'z; the traffic or development patterns in the immediate area. Retaining the 15 -foot strip will result in Lot 15 I'eiug less than the required 7,000 square feet in the RS -7 Dist,,ict. r 1 as1 'f 1 .t r F 8 i r <a; .4•b gG r f ,r a It e o r 4-1., r r i s r x P e T a At.. 2 i ts. .47 1-: i 4 c. 1 r yj e �E r3 <Y s•.Fr$. n 4 3 J 0 ..4 aa Property purchas f Request a ...-1 Page 4 u o o 0 C a f m a 3 w However, the lot presently is a non conforming lot of record t r and is subject to construction of a properly designed struc- e ture. The 15 -foot strip proposed for retention would take o w only a small portion of the lot's rear yard. Adequate rear Vo yard will remain to accommodate the required 25 -foot setback ;L when a house is Constructed. :a o The Department therefore recommends that o a the City sell to the N Petitioner the triangular portion of Lot 15, Block 129, Town- m site of Port Angeles, with the condition that a 15- foot -wide a strip, as measured from the edge of the bluff, be retained, 1 the exact location of which shall be determined by the Public j Works Department; and further conditioned upon the Petitioner r 3 compensating the City in accordance with the recommendation of 11. s the Real Estate Committee, I 1 1 ay k F;,'„ r t.: PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE tvas r.ct «v«to w. war�r. ti w I ;s' i Attu Fe..1 for Rcronl et Request of TO 'Tot E. Gladys F. Pearce 1116 Vest 4th Street CIAILA.4 COUNTY IREA.wkt.. Port Angeles, Va. 98362 EXCISE TAX E XiMPT DATE �f/ a if ?SON 1.5•11 Quit claim Defld tcorePOatatc ►oaws THE GRANTOR the City of Port %agales, a municipal corporation lac and isosasidsatiosef two thousand and 1.w /100 d+rllers (52,000.00) co roc a ad quit team to John 1.f. and Gladys F. Pearce (ff/W) He isaosla[ dactrhed scab elute, situated is the Crory .t Minim State of Washiegtow laraliding Oil interest thereto which grantor may hereafter acquire: All that portion of Lot 15, Block 129, ie.:matte of Port Angeles, described as follows: $egia.Lag at the northeast cozier of said Lot 15, thence west along ghe troth line of said Lot 15, a distance of 43.25 feet; thence south 18 30' east, a distance of 136.43 feet to the east line of said Lot 15; thence north along the easterly line of said Lot 15, a distance of 129.32 feet j to the place of beginning: -0 1 Escest the northeasterly fifteen (15) feet thereof: Coscaisiag 2,796 square feet. sore or less; of which 300 square feet, sore or leas, is retained; reseieder 2,496 square feet. amore or less. Q( IL TEN :S tritEREOF. mid' corporation has =OMMd this immanent to be emceed by its peeper officers and its expense sal se bc beretsst.'fused this day of Ctti9f Port iMgele iicir Mayor y ty Clark t STATE OF WASHINGTON'. i I Cwaty sa CLkI4. dh a tbis l Tor day o f MAY l 196 Z. Wort et. the ....arti.c.d• K o u r y noble 1. and fir the Start e( Kashaartea. defy cunrrri'ard and z o o m ',creamily apre:''d DORO Tiff 00 LicAti sea MAP-Ali C. PAi1SH wait ksesta as be the Mayor and City Clerk re>ptttf.rfy..1 C(ry OF fir A%6F,1�} de catwalks dot eerc.ted the toregoine M+tenanot• and t 'u4 *cd diortt d ta,tnone.t to be the free and wdsaurj ad set deed n( v:d e.rp,catioo.:or the e•1 sad wpm-1w thew ..(ersyed, s.d .e cub seated that TI(k" I A'Ki: esthwiad so mew the said Maeseeet and that t r _..A itOuey fi• tae _corporate seal of suet carp:wadS. e Waseca ley hr and .RcW gal hereto *Mood the der and ytaril't:atgt kiittei 7.• T 't• !f s Y r fl Sf N'tr1..rftw. f I.. audit[ I LEJ m 627,i-119 r