HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.447 Original Contract
5,1-</1
.'
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
AND BROWN AND CALDWELL
RELATING TO
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
TIllS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ~day of KJtrJ-.ot10)'). 1997, by
and between THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES, a non-charter code city of the State of
Washington, (hereinafter called the "CITY") and BROWN AND CALDWELL, a California
corporation (hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to undertake several independent wastewater system-related
evaluations including suitability of Rayonier leachate for treatment at the City's wastewater
treatment plant (WWTP); calibration of the WWTP's influent flow meter; continued permit
assistance; and development of a sanitary collection system conveyance model which operates
within the City's existing mapping/GIS system; and
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a qualified
consulting firm to perform the scope of work as detailed in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it is in full compliance with the statutes of the
State of Washington for professional registration and/or other applicable requirements; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has the background, experience, and ability to
perform the required work in accordance with the usual and customary professional standards
under similar circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it will provide qualified personnel and
appropriate facilities necessary to accomplish the work;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above representations and the terms, conditions,
covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of professional services to be performed and the results to be achieved by the
CONSULTANT shall be as detailed in the attached Exhibit A, and shall include all services and
material necessary to accomplish the work.
The CITY may review the CONSULTANT'S work product, and if it is not satisfactory, based on
the criteria set forth in Exhibit A, the CONSULTANT shall make such changes as may be
required by the CITY. Such changes shall not constitute "Extra Work" as related in Section XI of
this Agreement.
The CONSULTANT agrees that all services performed under this Agreement shall be in
accordance with the standards of the profession at the time CONSULTANT's work is rendered
and in compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws.
The Scope of Work may be amended upon written approval of both parties.
nt\3772\wp\wwsys _ ag.doc
Agreement--Page 1 of6
September 17, 1997
II OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon completion of the work, all documents, exhibits, photographic negatives, or other
presentations of the work shall become the property of the CITY for use without restriction and
without representation as to suitability for reuse by any other party unless specifically verified or
adapted by the CONSULTANT. However, any alteration or reuse of the documents, by the City
or by others acting through or on behalf of the City, will be at the City's sole risk.
CONSULTANT shall retain one file copy of all documents.
ill DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
Each party shall designate its representatives in writing. The CONSULTANT'S representative
shall be subject to the approval of the CITY.
IV TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The CONSULTANT may begin work upon execution of this Agreement by both parties. The
work shall be completed in accordance with the schedule set forth in the attached Exhibit D.
V PAYMENT
The CITY shall pay the CONSULTANT as set forth in this section of the Agreement. Such
payment shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and all labor,
materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT'S cost for actual labor, overhead and
profit plus CONSULTANT'S direct non-salary reimbursable costs as set forth in the
attached Exhibits B and C, respectively.
1. Labor costs shall be based on the hourly rates shown in Exhibit B. Hourly rates
shall be based upon an individual's hourly wage, times the total number of hours
worked, times a multiplier of 3.2775. The multiplier shall include overhead and
profit.
General clerical time shall be considered an overhead item, except where specific
work items are involved that require one-half hour or more continued effort, in
which case time will be charged on the basis of hours worked.
2. The direct non-salary reimbursable costs are those directly incurred in fulfilling the
terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, travel, subsistence,
telephone, CADD computer, reproduction and printing, supplies and fees of
outside services and consultants. T en percent (10%) overhead and profit may be
added to direct non-salary reimbursable costs.
B. The CONSULTANT shall submit invoices to the CITY on a monthly basis. Invoices shall
detail the work, hours, employee name, and hourly rate; shall itemize with receipts and
invoices the non-salary direct costs; shall indicate the specific task or activity in the Scope
of Work to which the costs are related; and shall indicate the cumulative total for each
task.
nt\3772\wp\wwsys _ ag.doc
Agreement--Page 2 of6
September 17, 1997
C. The CITY shall review the invoices and make payment for the percentage of the project
that has been completed less the amounts previously paid.
D. The CONSULTANT invoices are due and payable within 30 days of receipt. In the event
of a disputed billing, only the disputed portion will be withheld from payment.
E. Final payment for the balance due to the CONSULTANT will be made upon the
completion of the work and acceptance by the CITY.
F. Payment for "Extra Work" performed under Section XI of this Agreement shall be as
agreed to by the parties in writing.
VI MAXIMUM COMPENSATION
Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by both parties, the CONSULTANT'S total compensation
and reimbursement under this Agreement, including labor, direct non-salary reimbursable costs
and outside services, shall not exceed the maximum sum of$300,336.
vn EMPLOYMENT
Employees of the CONSULTANT, while engaged in the performance of any work or services
under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the
CITY, and claims that may arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said
employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any
negligent act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT'S employees while so engaged, on
any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and
responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
In performing this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall not employ or contract with any CITY
employee without the City's written consent.
VIII NONDISCRIMINATION
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable federal, state and CITY nondiscrimination
regulations and with the CITY'S Equal Opportunity! Affirmative Action clause, which is set forth
in the attached Exhibit E.
IX SUBCONTRACTS
A. The CONSULTANT shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement
without the written consent of the CITY.
B. The CONSULTANT will be using the firms submitted with its proposal as subcontractors.
Subcontractors other than those listed shall not be permitted without the written consent
of the CITY.
C. In all solicitation either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the
CONSULTANT for work to be performed pursuant to a subcontract, including
procurement of materials and equipment, each potential sub consultant or supplier shall be
notified by the CONSULTANT of Consultant's obligations under this Agreement,
including the nondiscrimination requirements.
nt\3772\wp\wwsys _ ag.doc
Agreement--Page 3 of 6
September 17, 1997
X CHANGES IN WORK
Other than changes directed by the CITY as set forth in Section I above, either party may request
changes in the scope of work. Such changes shall not become part of this Agreement unless and
until mutually agreed upon and incorporated herein by written amendments to this Agreement
executed by both parties.
XI EXTRA WORK
The CITY may desire to have the CONSULTANT perform work or render services in connection
with this project, in addition to the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A and minor revisions to
satisfactorily completed work. Such work shall be considered as "Extra Work" and shall be
addressed in a written supplement to this Agreement. The CITY shall not be responsible for
paying for such extra work unless and until the written supplement is executed by both parties.
XII TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days
written notice to the CONSULTANT. Written notice will be by certified mail sent to the
consultant's designated representative at the address provided by the CONSULTANT.
B. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to the completion of the work, a final
payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT, which, when added to any payments
previously made, shall compensate the CONSULTANT for services rendered up to the
date of termination.
C. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work, documents that
are the property of the CITY pursuant to Section IT above, shall be delivered to and
received by the CITY prior to transmittal offinal payment to the CONSULTANT.
xm INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS
The CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify the CITY from any claims, damages, losses, and costs
including but not limited to attorney's fees and litigation costs arising out of claims by third parties
for property damage and bodily injury including death, caused solely by the negligence of willful
misconduct of the CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT employees, affiliated corporations, officers,
and subcontractors in connection with the work performed under this Agreement.
The CITY agrees to indemnify the CONSULTANT from any claims, damages, losses, and costs
including but not limited to attorney's fees and litigation costs arising out of claims by third parties
for property damage and bodily injury including death, caused solely by the negligence or willful
misconduct of the CITY, CITY's employees, or agents in connection with the work performed
under this Agreement.
If the negligence or willful misconduct of both CONSULTANT and CITY (or a person identified
above for whom each is liable) is a cause of such damage or injury, the loss, cost, or expense shall
be shared between the CONSULTANT and the CITY in proportion to their relative degrees of
negligence or willful misconduct and the right of indemnity shall apply for such proportion.
nt\3772\wp\wwsys _ ag.doc
Agreement--Page 4 of 6
September 17, 1997
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, then in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or
damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
CONSULTANT and the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the
CONSULTANT's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's
negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided
herein constitutes the CONSULTANT's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51
RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated
by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement. However, the CONSULTANT expressly reserves its rights as a third person set forth
inRCW 51.24.035.
XIV INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance
against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors.
The CONSULTANT shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit
per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and,
2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less
than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for
personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be
limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations; broad form property
damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCV) if applicable; and employer's
liability; and,
3. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
CONSULTANT.
The CITY shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance
policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of the
endorsement naming the CITY as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of
Insurance. The CITY reserves the right to review a certified copy of all required insurance
policies in the CONSULTANT's office.
The CONSULTANT'S insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately
to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits
of the insurer's liability.
The CONSULTANT'S insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY and the CITY
shall be given thirty [30] days prior written notice of any cancellation, suspension, or material
change in coverage.
nt\3772\wp\wwsys _ ag.doc
Agreement--Page 5 of 6
September 17, 1997
XV APPLICABLE LAW
This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington, and in the event of dispute the venue of any litigation brought hereunder shall be
Clallam County.
XVI EXHIBITS AND SIGNATURES
This Agreement, including its exhibits, constitutes the entire Agreement, supersedes all prior
written or oral understandings, and may only be changed by a written amendment executed by
both parties. The following exhibits are hereby made a part of this Agreement:
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Exhibit B - Consultant Labor Costs
Exhibit C - Non-salary Reimbursable Costs
Exhibit D - Schedule for the Work
Exhibit E - Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action/Facilities Nondiscrimination
In WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year
first written above.
BROWN AND CALDWELL
..
~~-.......;
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
e'N~
Craig Knutson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
~~1}~ ,) JpliJR
Becky Up Ci ClerK
nt\3772\wp\wwsys _ ag.doc
Agreement--Page 6 of 6
September 17, 1997
EXHffiIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PORT ANGELES
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
This agreement covers the consulting engineering services anticipated to occur generally between
July 1997 and the end of 1998. Individual task descriptions are included below.
Task 1.0 Project Management and Coordination, Scope Development
To manage, administer, and provide ongoing coordination for the project. This task includes
technical and financial management of the contract; liaison with the City, operational staff, design
team, and subconsultants.
Approach. Major activities include:
1. Prepare a project management plan that covers all work. The plan would define
the personnel, project schedule, scope of services, project control reports, method
of estimating completion of work, invoicing, records storage, project filing, and
calculation filing.
2. Utilize the program schedule prepared under Item 1 above to monitor the progress
of the work in relation to established time and budget constraints. Update and
coordinate schedule revisions with the City.
3. Prepare monthly progress reports for submittal with progress payment invoices
with backup as required by the City. Progress reports will identify budget status,
progress status, major activities of the previous month, out of scope work,
upcoming activities, and issues or complications that could prevent meeting
milestones.
4. Assumes that work will be spread over an I8-month period.
5 . Work to develop and coordinate with the City this current scope of service was in
excess of 100 hours due in particular to the varied approaches to III reduction
work that can be undertaken and which needed to be costed prior to discussion. A
recoverable allowance of one-half that, or 50 hours, is included in the budget.
Task 2.0 WWTP Process Impacts from Rayonier Landfill Leachate
A pending agreement between Rayonier and the City of Port Angeles could bring approximately
12 million gallons ofRayonier landfill leachate to the City's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).
nt\3772\wplscope2 doc
Exhibit A--Page 1 of 13
September 17, 1997
The purpose of this task is to determine impacts, if any, upon the WWTP process and whether an
amendment to the City's NPDES permit is required.
Approach. Work under this task includes:
1. Review of data provided by Rayonier.
2. Direction of the City's WWTP laboratory as to additional testing.
3. Process modeling to determine impact upon the plant's TFSC process and plant
eflluent quality.
Dr. Henryk Melcer will work directly with plant supervisor Kevin Curtis and environmental staff
from Rayonier to determine constituents of the leachate and associated process impacts.
Products. A letter report which includes:
1. Lists leachate constituents of concern.
2. Quantifies potential impacts upon the TFSC process and eflluent quality.
3. Provides recommendations regarding acceptance of the leachate, and Rayonier-
City agreement provisions.
4. Summarizes discussions with WDOE regarding necessity to amend the NPDES
permit.
Task 3.0 Calibrate Plant Flow Meter
The proposed scope of services to be performed by Brown and Caldwell includes calibration of
the influent parshall flume at the Port Angeles wastewater treatment plant. The tests will be
performed using the dye dilution technique to independently measure flow for comparison with
data recorded by the flow meter. Our general methods and equipment are discussed in detail
below.
Approach. The following general testing procedures would be followed.
The basic dye dilution technique involves the injection of a fluorescent dye at a known, constant
rate into the flow stream, then measuring the dye concentration downstream after complete
mixing with the flow stream. The dye dilution (injected dye concentration divided by downstream
dye concentration) is directly proportional to the flow rate, and the flow stream flow rate can be
calculated by multiplying the dye dilution times the dye injection rate.
A number of conditions must be met to obtain accurate results: 1) the dye injection rate must be
steady and verifiable; 2) the dye must be completely mixed at the downstream sampling point and
at equilibrium concentration; 3) background effects (dye absorption, degradation, masking, or
nt\3772\wplscope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 2 of 13
September 17, 1997
background fluorescence) must be accounted for; and 4) dye measurements must be compensated
for temperature effects.
Dye and Injection Details. Rhodamine WT dye will be used as the fluorescent tracer dye.
The injection feed solution will be prepared by diluting the stock dye (approximately 20% active
solution from the manufacturer) with deionized water. The actual feed dilution will depend on the
expected flow in the channel. The target final dye concentration will be nominally 20 ppb in the
wastewater after complete mixing; therefore, the dye injection rate will be varied depending on
the expected effluent flow rate and the mixed feed dye concentration.
A constant displacement metering pump manufactured by Fluid Metering, Inc. will be used for the
dye injection. The pump is driven by a servo motor and controller by CompuMotor. The servo
motor/controller system automatically compensates for any forces affecting the shaft rotation
speed. The operation and status of the injection system will be monitored continuously using a
computer.
The dye injection pump calibration will be checked prior to the tests using a graduated cylinder
and stop watch and measuring the pumping rate at various shaft rotation speeds to verify the
calibration curve.
Clean water will be used as a carrier stream to force metered dye into the flow stream. The dye
and metering apparatus will be installed in a van that can be parked near the injection point. The
metered dye joins the carrier stream through an eductor installed on the carrier stream hose. The
carrier stream hose then leads to the injection point
Dye Sampling. A continuous-flow sampling system will be installed at the sampling point.
The system includes a Grundfos 2" submersible pump with variable speed controller for pumping
water out of the channel. The pump is connected to a Turner Designs Model 10 fluorometer
outfitted with a flow-through cuvette system. The fluorometer is in turn connected to a data
acquisition and radio telemetry system with a real-time data link to the dye injection van.
This system allows the operator of the dye injection apparatus to continuously monitor effluent
dye concentrations during a test and determine, without guessing, 1) that the dye has arrived; 2)
when it reaches equilibrium concentration; 3) whether the dye is properly mixing; and 4) whether
the dye concentration is within the optimal measurement range.
When effluent dye concentrations stabilize within the proper concentration range, at least 3 grab
samples will be collected from the pumped stream at I-minute intervals for later precision dye
analysis using laboratory instrumentation.
Background Sampling and Field Spiking. Background samples will be collected from the
flow stream before and after each dye injection period. The pre- and post injection background
samples will then be compo sited and a portion will be saved as a blank background sample. The
remainder will be used to produce a spiked sample using the feed dye and volumetric glassware in
the field. The blank and spiked background samples will be saved for pre-measurement
processing and precision dye analysis using laboratory instrumentation.
nt\3772\wplscope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 3 of 13
September 17, 1997
Dye Concentration Analysis. Effluent dye samples and background samples will be
analyzed for dye concentrations using a Turner Designs Model 10AU digital fluorometer. A
portion of each sample will be transferred to 13 mm cuvettes and centrifuged to remove settleable
solids. The cuvettes will then be placed in a circulating water bath. An entire test run consisting
of 3 flow stream samples, a blank background sample and a spiked background sample will be
held for a minimum of 20 minutes in the water bath. These will then be measured sequentially in
the fluorometer as a group to insure temperature consistency.
Data Analysis. Measured dye concentrations will be adjusted before being used to
calculate the flow stream flow rates. The adjustment will be based on the blank and spiked
background sample concentrations from each flow test run. The adjusted dye concentrations will
be calculated as follows (all concentrations in parts per billion, ppb):
Ca = (Cm-b)* (spike/(Cs-b )),
where, Ca = Concentration of sample, adjusted
Cm = Concentration of sample, as measured
b = lank background concentration
Cs = Concentration measured on spiked background
spike = Concentration of spiked background based on volumetric dilution
calculations
Flow rates will then be calculated as follows:
Q = q (CrlCa)
where, Q =
q=
CF
Ca=
Flow stream flow rate
Dye injection rate
Feed dye concentration
Concentration of sample adjusted, from above
Product. Dye testing results will be presented in tables and figures showing the comparison of
actual flows determined by dye dilution versus recorded flow measured by the tested flow meter.
Task 4.0 Continuing NPDES and Permit Negotiations
Work leading up to the City's application to the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) for
renewal of the City's WWTP National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
discharge permit was completed last year and the City's application submitted. Written response
from WDOE has not been received, however, there have been verbal indications that additional
forms may be required.
Likewise, application for all permits necessary for outfall construction were submitted. Final
responses from the Washington Department of Fisheries and Wildlife (WDFW) have not yet been
received. The Hydraulic Permit currently asks for a water re-use evaluation which is being
contested by the City.
nt\3772\wp\scope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 4 of 13
September 17, 1997
This task allows for a low level of continued assistance (50 hours) related to outstanding
wastewater permitting and negotiations activities.
Task 5.0 III and CSO Reduction Activities
This task provides the groundwork necessary for continued progress on reducing Inflow and
Infiltration (III) and related Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) in the Port Angeles sanitary
collection system. It builds upon previous investigations. It includes assistance to formulate and
implement programmatic means (ordinances) to reduce III; identification and field investigations
necessary to implement a future III reduction demonstration project; development and calibration
of a detailed hydraulic conveyance model which operates from data obtained from the City's
mapping! GIS system; training for City staff; and development of CSO reduction alternatives
which will be the basis for a future update to the City's CSO reduction plan.
Subtask 5.1 Programmatic Assistance
This subtask evaluates means to provide for systematic reduction in III and CSOs through
programmatic changes. Programmatic changes includes implementation of City ordinances and
changes to water rate structures that reduce water use. Anticipated benefits to programmatic
changes are the assured implementation of physical improvements, and the demonstration of
continuous progress in meeting State water quality goals. Changes would only be recommended
for adoption if modeling tests done within Task 5.0 indicate that substantial III and CSO
reduction results could be anticipated. The following types of programmatic changes will be
evaluated:
. Rehab lateral/remove roof leaders at time of sale (similar to Alameda, CA)
. Subsidized rehab/removal based on voluntary or mandatory assignment (similar to
Portland, OR, others)
. Requirements for roofleader disconnect or storage of on site runoff when major re-
models occur (similar to Seattle)
. Tighter construction standards for new buildings (similar to Sammamish Plateau)
to prevent new construction from adding to the problem.
. Block rates for water consumption.
Approach: Following development of the conveyance system model, runs will be made to
estimate the long-term benefits to implementation of each of the above types of programmatic
changes.
For those which potentially make significant reductions in III (the benefit) , the following will be
prepared:
nt\3772\wp\scope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 5 of 13
September 17, 1997
. Discussion of non-economic impacts
. Detailed ordinance implementation steps
. Procedures to be used by field staff to test whether construction has been
successfully implemented, e.g., lateral test procedures
. Recommended special features: e.g., cost caps, alternative III fund contributions,
tests of reasonableness, training and certification requirements
. Estimated implementation and program costs
. First draft of the Port Angeles ordinance
The consultant would then facilitate discussions to explain programs, benefits, and costs to the
City Council and the public. The consultant would primarily work through the Utility Advisory
Committee (UAC). The UAC would take the lead in determining the nature and frequency of
public and Council involvement.
An ordinance that proceeds to implementation would normally involve meetings with the UAC,
with special interest groups (real estate, plumbers, title insurance, etc.), the Council and the
public. For each of these meetings, presentation materials, advertisements and notification are
involved. The implementation process may involve identification, training and certification of
non-city staff to implement the program fully.
For the purpose of estimating the cost for this subtask, it is assumed that two ordinances are
found to have sufficient modeled III reduction benefits to proceed further and that effort for each
of these would involve the following:
1. Model III reduction benefits for all potential programmatic changes.
2. Develop costs, non-economic impacts, implementation steps, special features,
estimated implantation and program costs, successful implementation test
procedures, and first draft ordinance wording.. Present in a summary
recommendation memorandum.
3. Meet three times with the UAC to discuss ordinances, once during development of
draft ordinance recommendation memoranda, and twice after.
4. Meet once with the City attorney.
5. Meet twice with special interest groups as arranged by UAC staff
6. Assist the City with two public meetings. Provide masters for information
packages to be used at the public meetings.
nt\3772\wp\scope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 6 of 13
September 17, 1997
7. Maintain log of comments received from all parties with rolling update as to how
comments have been incorporated.
7. Develop procedure (checklist) to determine whether III from a specific house or
site can be effectively disposed of
8. Recommend certification processes for local plumbing contractors.
City Requirements: The city will designate an individual to oversee implementation of draft
ordinances and subsequent administration. The City attorney will edit the consultant's draft
ordinances.
Products: The following products will be produced:
1. Memorandum summarizing all programmatic changes considered, and results of
initial III reduction modeling screening results.
2. One memorandum for each recommended programmatic change (two assumed)
with cost, benefits, impacts, features, test procedures, and draft ordinance.
3. Information package materials for meetings with the UAC, special interest groups,
City attorney, and the public.
4. Checklists for individual house or site determination to see if water disposal will
have negative impacts.
5. Memorandum on recommended certification procedures for local plumbing
contractors.
6. Log of comments received from all sources on draft ordinances and programmatic
changes noting response or action taken to each comment
Subtask 5.2 Financial Framework
To provide a basis for implementing and staging potential III and CSO control projects, a review
of the utility's financial capacity to fund additional capital projects will be undertaken.
Approach: From review of the 1997 budget and 1996 utility data, the utility's current cost
structure will be identified. Key information will include the number of equivalent residential
customers, current operational cost, annual debt payment, capital funding sources and revenue
surpluses (if any).
From review of current debt status and current capital program obligations, annual principal and
interest debt service, projected annual committed capital expenditures and reserve accounts will
be identified. Based on interviews with utility management, proposed rate increases (if any) will
be identified, projected new hook ups and hook up fee revenue will be identified.
nt\3772\wp\scope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 7 of 13
September 17, 1997
Based upon the above information, the utility's ability to support additional bonds, or State loans
or pay-as-you-go financing will be identified. The impact of charging equivalent customer rate
and fee increases for capital funding options will be identified. From the above information and
input from utility management, alternative capital funding will be developed to provide the
engineering team a financial framework for the phasing and implementation of potential capital
projects.
Products: The following products will be produced:
A memorandum identifying alternative funding programs, including projected rate and hook up
fee impacts, available debt capacity, and a recommended capital program cost and implementation
schedule.
Subtask 5.3 Construct System Hydraulic Model
The model will be developed for the combined-sanitary collection system only. The model must
be suitable for detailed estimation of design flows for pumping station and treatment plant
upgrades; facilitate testing of alternative scenarios for reducing III and related CSOs; and be a
usable tool for such ongoing activities as analyzing the impacts of land development proposals to
the wastewater collection system. It is assumed that lines carrying a minimum of 60,000 gpd
during dry weather or serving a minimum of 225 homes (or equivalent commercial employment)
will be modeled.
Based on these needs, the model selected for this project is SewerCAT, developed by Reid
Crowther. The SewerCAT model is a Windows-based program based on hydraulic and flow
generating routines of the EP A SWMM model. SewerCAT has much better computational
elements, resulting in hydraulic simulation times that are as much as 60 times faster than the EP A-
SWMM model. The model provides a very flexible input Graphical User Interface (Gill). For
instance, the ability to add relief pipes or modify the sewer configuration, which is a necessary
feature when trying to analyze how variations affect the overall system, is done very easily in
SewerCAT's Windows interface. Of greatest benefit for this project is SewerCAT's ability for
real time control simulation. SewerCAT offers the user the ability to run simulations on different
routing scenarios and use the results to control the sewer system, such as changing storage tank
sizes and overflow weir settings. Unlike the other models, SewerCAT can also be modified
during a run to see how the solution is affected. SewerCAT has been used to study the hydraulics
ofthe entire City of London sewer system among other projects.
Approach. Major assumptions and work activities are as follows:
1. It is assumed that the following data are substantially developed and already incorporated
into the City's AutoCAD mapping system, some of which may need to undergo GIS
converSIOn:
a) Streets.
b) Contours.
c) Survey controls.
Exhibit A--Page 8 of 13lntIJ772\wplscope2.doc September 17, 1997
d) Catch basins.
e) Sanitary and combined sewers (must convert).
f) Sewer service laterals.
g) Sewer service stubouts.
h) Sewer manholes with rim elevations (must convert).
2. It is assumed the following data have already been collected by the City, have been
integrated into the City's mapping/GIS database, and must be incorporated into the sewer
system model in SewerCAT:
a) Pipe name, length, diameter, and inverts.
b) Upstream and downstream manhole names which define system connectivity.
c) Results of smoke testing.
d) Known III connection points to the sanitary system (1,100 +).
3. It is assumed the following data is not yet available and will have to be developed or
obtained through interviews with the City Planning Department:
a) Planning data.
b) Zoning data.
c) Urban growth areas.
d) Population and employment projections.
e) Industrial loads.
f) Cost modules for CSO storage.
4. The following will be created during development of the conveyance model:
a)
Pipe and manhole data necessary for accurate hydraulic representation of the
system including pipe-to-manhole connectivity.
b)
c)
Wastewater input flows relflted to population, employment, and delineated sewer
basin which will be calibrated to dry weather wastewater treatment plant data.
I
Representative III flow hydro graphs related to rainfall and III conditions in each
I
different sewer basin (including known III connection points).
System testing flow files ~ased upon 1988 large basin flow measurements and
1967 smoke testing data. I
d)
5. The calibrated flow model will be reviewed with Operations staff familiar with the
conveyance system.
6. System capacity and limitations will be identified:
a) Run conveyance model, report system conveyance capacity, and document upon
the collection system maps generated through the City's existing mapping/GIS
system. Only present popu!ation conditions will be simulated at this time. Future
nt\3772\wp~cope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 9 of 13
September 17, 1997
population and employment data will be used to perform subsequent analyses
during the future update to the City's 1989 wastewater facilities plan, planned for
authorization in 1998.
b) Compare capacity to estimated peak current storm influenced flow projections
under existing conditions.
Products: The products of Subtask 5.3 include:
1. Technical memorandum documenting capacity of eXIstmg collection system
components, and interpretation of measured CSO and smoke data from 1988 and
1967 respectively.
2. Electronic tools incorporated into the City's existing mapping/GIS system.
At the conclusion of this task, the City will have a model of the collection system, developed to
the detail described above. The precision of flows estimated in the system are dependent upon the
resolution of two data sets: geographic population distribution and flow monitoring data. The
model is capable of using flow inputs that are more detailed than this task will develop. The work
described above does not consist of a fully developed hydraulic model for sanitary sewer
comprehensive planning. It is developed as a tool for evaluating and routing peak flows caused
by III. In many cases, wastewater flows will be a small amount of the peak flows conveyed
during large storm events; therefore, it is not as necessary to use detailed geographic population
distribution data.
Subtask 5.4 Evaluate Basin 1
The hydraulic model will be used to evaluate the feasibility of eliminating overflows at Pump
Station 1 by removing the connected areas identified in the smoke testing work. If disconnecting
drains will not alone eliminate overflows at Pump Station 1, a pilot III removal project area will be
identified in Basin 1.
Subtask 5.5 Identification ofIJI Removal Pilot Project Areas
Depending upon the outcome of Subtask 5.4, this task will be concerned either with identifying
potential pilot project areas within Basin 1 or outside of Basin 1. The purpose of the pilot
projects is to determine achievable III removal, best methods of removal, and true cost of
removal, all site specific to the Port Angeles system. Such data will provide a more accurate
picture of the potential success for III removal from the system.
Approach.
1. Brown and Caldwell will review existing information and interview City staff to
identify up to five potential III pilot project areas.
Exhibit A--Page 10 of 13
nt\3772\wp~cope2.doc September 17, 1997
2. Brown and Caldwell and City staff will score each potential pilot area with the
criteria of the scoring system and recommend the best two locations for further
field investigations.
3. Develop a scoring system for evaluating potential pilot project areas based on:
a) III conditions.
b) Existing flow data.
c) Existing smoke testing data.
d) System service area.
e) Estimate of III removal potential.
f) Reliability of previous flow-monitoring and field-investigations.
Product. A technical memorandum will be written which describes the scoring system, potential
pilot project areas, and recommendations from the scoring process.
Subtask 5.6 Field Investigations for IJI Source Detection
Previous work has identified a significant number of III sources. Smoke testing, done across the
entire city, identifies drains directly connected to the sewer system. For use in the system
hydraulic model, it is also necessary to determine the tributary area for each of those drains. Flow
monitoring was also performed in 1988; however, the basins were very large (all greater than 80
acres). Siting a potential pilot project area for III removal will require additional flow monitoring.
Other field tests that will be useful in identifying III sources include additional smoke testing, dye
testing, and television inspection. Subtasks 5.5 and 5.6 will identify locations for potential pilot
projects where the field investigations will be conducted.
Approach. The following field investigations will be performed in selected areas: flow
monitoring, smoke testing, dye testing, and television inspection.
1. Flow Monitoring: Local system flow monitoring will be performed for the
purpose of delineating and quantifying the III in potential pilot project areas. It is
assumed that the City will conduct flow monitoring using existing monitors. If
new monitors are required, the City will pay for purchase and installation of the
new monitors. Monitors will be installed in January 1998 and will remain in place
until the end of May 1998.
2. Smoke Testing: Supplemental smoke testing will be performed in two types of
areas: areas of potential III pilot project work, and areas where original data is
suspect or needs to be supplemented. It is estimated that no more than 200
sewered acres will be smoke tested.
3. Dye Testing: Dye testing will be performed in the potential pilot project areas to
confirm direct connections of drains to the sewer. Up to 50 dye tests will be
performed on critical connections to the sewer system.
nt\3772\wplscope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 11 of 13
September 17, 1997
4. Television Inspection: Television inspection will be performed by a sub consultant
to Brown and Caldwell in select areas to determine the condition of the existing
sewer system. Inspected areas will include all of the pilot project areas, and up to
an additional 15,000 lineal feet of sewer main will be inspected (20,000 feet total).
All gathered data will be electronically stored for integration with the GIS data developed for this
project. Following the GIS input offield data, the process of III allocation will be performed:
1. III model will be calibrated to collected flow monitoring data.
2. III will be allocated to sources of III and sewer system components.
3. Based on the field data and III allocation, recommendations will be made on
construction projects for removing III.
Product. A technical memorandum will be written which documents findings during the field
investigations. Monthly reports offlow monitoring data will be submitted to the City for review.
Data gathered during the field investigations will be input to a database compatible with the City's
GIS platform and will be forwarded to the City. The technical memorandum will include
recommendations for III removal projects.
Subtask 5.7 Training of City Staff
Two four-hour training sessions will be provided.
Subtask 5.8 Development of CSO Reduction Alternatives
The model will be the primary tool for judging the effectiveness of proposed collection system
modifications to reduce III and related CSOs. Descriptions of alternatives to be evaluated will be
developed under this subtask.
Approach. Brown and Caldwell will work with two designated representatives from the City to
brainstorm, cull, and refine alternatives to be evaluated in a future update to the collection system
portions ofthe City's 1989 Facilities Plan. The team's objective will be to define a minimum of six
potentially implement able projects or approaches to reducing III or dealing with collection system
peak flows. The investigation will include discussion of centralized and distributed in-line and
off-line CSO storage, utilization of tanks at the former Rayonier mill as plant headworks
equalization, programmatic reduction in impervious areas (programs to remove house roof leader
connections, etc.), complete inflow rehabilitation of select high contributory areas, etc. The
impact these alternatives have on the influent flows to existing pump stations will be analyzed.
Products. Documentation (descriptions) of jointly developed City/Brown and Caldwell
alternatives for collection system modifications. The number of alternatives will be sufficient to
address both planning concerns related to City growth and expansion as well as evaluation of
specific projects to reduce existing levels of III and related CSOs from the existing system.
nt\3772\wp\scope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 12 of 13
September 17, 1997
PORT ANGELES PILOT III REMOVAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
REVIEW FLOW
MONITORING
DATA
REVIEW SMOKE
TESTING DATA
CONSTRUCT
SYSTEM
HYDRAULIC
MODEL
CALIBRATE
SYSTEM
HYDRAULIC
MODEL
TEST RESULT OF
BASIN 1 DRAIN
DISCONNECTION
PROGRAM
DEVELOP PILOT
PROJECT IN
BASIN 1
NO
YES
EVALUATE
OTHER BASINS
FOR POTENTIAL
PILOT PROJECTS
CONDUCT FLOW
MONITORING, TV
INSPECTION, AND SMOKE
TESTING IN SELECTED
PILOT AREA
ALLOCATE III TO
SOURCES AND
FORECAST
POTENTIAL
REMOVAL
Task 6.0 Directed Services
The City has established a budgeted amount of$10,000 for special services not otherwise covered
by specific tasks of this agreement. Such services shall be undertaken only when so directed by
the City.
nt\3772\wplscope2.doc
Exhibit A--Page 13 of 13
September 17, 1997
EXHffiIT B
COMPENSATION
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Total Direct Indirect Other
Task Description Labor Labor Direct Subs Fee Task Total
Costs
1 Admimstration, Coordination, $12,825 $23,726 $2,120 $0 $5,695 $44,366
and Scope Development
2 Rayonier Leachate Impacts $1,532 $2,834 $184 $0 $673 $5,224
3 Calibrate Plant Flow Meter $2,547 $4,712 $3,151 $0 $1,404 $11,814
4 Permit Negotiations $1,693 $3,131 $137 $0 $737 $5,698
5 III and CSO Reduction Activities $58,098 $107,482 $7,833 $22,000 $27,820 $223,233
6 Directed Services $2,931 $5,423 $357 $0 $1,289 $10,000
7
8
Totals
$79,626 $147,308 $13,783 $22,000 $37,618
$300,336
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Task 1
Administration, Coordination, and Scope Development
Direct Labor
Category/Name
ProfessiOnal Rate Hours Subtotal Total
J. Warburton $67.31 0 0.00
R. Denson $33 85 0 000
D Eckhardt $45.06 0 000
M. Flanigan $27.63 0 0.00
B Persich $42 19 0 0.00
A Lukas $2675 0 0.00
S Merrill $4773 0 0.00
A Molseed $30 96 0 000
S Piccolo $22 26 0 000
D Schneider $40 34 280 11,295.20
Engmeer I $25.00 0 000
Technical
D Aspmall $28 23 0 000
S PlanclC $25.56 0 000
L Miller $26.59 0 0.00
AdmmlstratiOn
G Beckman $23.31 0 000
J Lmdsey $19.87 56 1,11272
Word Processor $1738 24 417.12
Subtotal Direct Labor 360 12,825.04
Indirect Labor Cost 185% 23,726.32
Total Labor Cost $36,55136
Dlfect Costs
Telephone/Fax 125.00
Photocopies 200.00
Printing 75.00
Fllm/Prmts 75.00
Travel/Parkmg 750.00
ShlppmgIPostage 150.00
Computer/Word Prc.lCADD 745.38
Total Direct Costs $2,12038
Subconsultant Costs
000
000
000
Total Subconsultant Costs
$000
Fee ~15% on labor, 10% on Other Direct Costs and Subconsultants)
$5,694.74
TASK TOTAL
$44,366.49
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Task 2
Rayonier Leachate Impacts
Direct Labor
Category/Name
ProfessIOnal Rate Hours Subtotal Total
J. Warburton $67.31 0 000
R Denson $33 85 0 000
D. Eckhardt $45 06 0 000
M. Flamgan $27 63 0 0.00
H Melcer $40 66 32 1,301 12
B Perslch $42 19 0 0.00
A Lukas $2675 0 000
S Memll $47.73 0 000
A. Molseed $30 96 0 000
S. Piccolo $22 26 0 0.00
D Schneider $40 34 4 161 36
Engmeer I $25 00 0 0.00
Techmcal
D Aspmall $28 23 0 000
S. Planclc $25 56 0 0.00
L Miller $26 59 0 000
AdministratIOn
G. Beckman $23 31 0 0.00
J Lmdsey $1987 0 0.00
Word Processor $1738 4 69.52
Subtotal Direct Labor 40 1,53200
Indlfect Labor Cost 185% 2,834.20
Total Labor Cost $4,366 20
Direct Costs
Telephone/Fax
Photocopies 10.00
Pnntmg 10 00
FilmIPrints
Travel/Parkmg 75.00
ShlppingIPostage
Computer/Word Prc /CADD 89.38
Total Direct Costs $18438
Subconsultant Costs
000
000
Total Subconsultant Costs
$0.00
Fee (15% on labor, 10% on Other Direct Costs and Subconsultants)
$673 37
TASK TOTAL
$5,223.95
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Task 3
Calibrate Plant Flow Meter
Direct Labor
Category/Name
Professional Rate Hours Subtotal Total
J. Warburton $67.31 0 000
R Denson $33 85 0 000
D Eckhardt $45 06 0 000
M. Flarugan $27 63 0 000
B. Persich $42.19 0 0.00
A Lukas $2675 0 0.00
R McDonals $32.86 50 1,643 00
S.Memll $47.73 0 000
A Molseed $30.96 0 000
S Piccolo $22.26 0 000
D Schneider $40.34 0 000
Engmeer I $25.00 0 000
Technical
D Aspmall $28 23 0 000
S Plancic $25.56 0 000
L Miller $26.59 34 904 06
AdmlmstratlOn
G. Beckman $23 31 0 0.00
J Lindsey $1987 0 0.00
Word Processor $17.38 $000 000
Subtotal Direct Labor 84 2,547 06
indirect Labor Cost 185% 4,71206
Total Labor Cost $7,259 12
Direct Costs
Telephone/Fax 480 00
Photocopies
Pnntmg
Fdm/Pnnts
TraveIlParkmg 850 00
Shlppmg/Postage 10000
EqUIp Rental/Supplies 1,355 00
ComputerJWord Prc./CADD 365.93
Total Direct Costs $3,15093
Subconsultant Costs
000
000
000
Total Subconsultant Costs $000
Fee (15% on labor, 10% on Other Direct Costs and Subconsultants) $1,40396
TASK TOTAL $11,814.01
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Task 4
Permit Negotiations
Duect Labor
CategorylName
Professional Rate Hours Subtotal Total
J Warburton $67.31 0 0.00
R. Denson $33 85 50 1,692 50
D. Eckhardt $45 06 0 0.00
M. Flarugan $27 63 0 000
B. Persich $42 19 0 000
A. Lukas $2675 0 0.00
S Memll $47.73 0 0.00
A Molseed $30 96 0 000
S Piccolo $22.26 0 0.00
D Schneider $40.34 0 0.00
Engmeer I $25.00 0 000
Techmcal
D. Aspinall $28 23 0 000
S. PlanclC $25 56 0 0.00
L. Miller $26 59 0 000
AdmmlstratlOn
G Beckman $2331 0 0.00
J Lindsey $1987 0 000
Word Processor $17.38 0 000
Subtotal Direct Labor 50 1,69250
Indirect Labor Cost 185% 3,131 13
Total Labor Cost $4,823 63
Direct Costs
Te1ephone/Fax 25.00
Photocopies 2500
Prmtmg
F tlmIPrints
Travel/Parkmg
Shipping/Postage
Computer/Word Prc /CADD 87.13
Total Direct Costs $137.13
Subconsultant Costs
000
000
000
Total Subconsultant Costs
$000
Fee (15% on labor, 10% on Other Direct Costs and Subconsultants)
$737.26
TASK TOTAL
$5,698.01
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Professional Tech Admm.
TASK 5 III and CSO Reduction AclMl1es J I i 1 1l 1 j
-jij ~ ~ j Jl
Ii: '" ~
Task 5 Acl1Vll1es
5 Il'roglammalle Ass1stanee
1 Compile resource ordmances 4 4
2 Computer lIJDula1lonlmemonndlDll 16 24 12 4
3 Non.econOJDlc nnpac1B 8
4 Oldmanee unplementallon steps 4 8 8 2
5 Field test procedures 8 8 2
6 SpeCllll features 8 8 8
7 hnp and program C081lI 8 4 16
S Draft ordmances 8 4 6 4 8 8
9 Ordmance memomnda 4 8 20 6
10 Meetmp (all) 16 24 8 64 24 4
11 Commentary log 8
12 Site eheekhst 12 2
13 Cerb.ficab.on procell 12
14 MIse 8 2
5 2 FmanCUll Framework
1 FmanCUll framework 60 120 12
5 3 Conshuet System Hydrauhc Model
1 Convert AutoCAD to GIS 20 40
2 Assemble Sewer System Data 10 20
3 Gather Data for l'1ow Estunales 20 120
4 Construct and Csb1>rate Model 40 8 240
5 ReVIew Model WIth Staff 4
6 Perform CapllClly Analym 8 40 16
5 4 Evaluate Basm I
Evaluate for pilot po1lm1lal 8 32 2
5 5 Iden1lJY PUot PrOject Are..
Develop Sconng System 2 2
2 RtMew Data and Pick Sties 20 4 4 2 2
Select a Pilot SifAl 4
5 6 Field InvesbgalloM
Flow Momtonng 20 20 2
2 Smoke Terbng 12 48 2
DYe Terbng 8 100
TelOVlSlon lnapec1lon 8 16 80 2
Constructlll Model 8 40
6 1Il AIlocallon to Component> 8 20 2 2
1 Constroc1lon Recommendallou 8 16 2 2
5 7 Tram Staff
Sewer Model Trammg 24 24
5 8 Develop CSO Reduchon Altemallves
Develop Altemahves 60 16 24 8 16
116 0 0 0 374 82 56 36 154 828 0 12 64 0 181 19 1982
9117/VrJ.:51PMPA9B_4.xb:]
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Task 5
III and CSO Reduction Activities
DIrect Labor
Category/Name
ProfessIOnal Rate Hours Subtotal Total
J Warburton $67.31 116 7,807 96
R. Denson $33 85 0 000
D. Eckhardt $45.06 0 0.00
M. Flamgan $27.63 0 000
B Perslch $42 19 0 000
A. Lukas $26.75 374 10,004.50
S Merrill $4773 82 3,913.86
A Molseed $30 96 56 1,733.76
S. PIccolo $22 26 36 801 36
D SchneIder $40 34 154 6,21236
Engineer I $25.00 828 20,700.00
Technical
D Aspmall $28.23 0 0.00
S. Planclc $25.56 64 1,635 84
L. MIller $26.59 12 319 08
Admmlstratmn
G. Beckman $23.31 0 000
J Lmdsey $19 87 181 3,59647
Word Processor $1738 79 1,37302
Subtotal DIrect Labor 1982 58,09821
Indirect Labor Cost 185% 107,481 69
Total Labor Cost $165,57990
DIrect Costs
Telephone/Fax 200 00
PhotocopIes 400 00
Printmg 000
Film/Prints 400 00
TravellParking 2,500 00
ShippingIPostage 000
ComputerlWord Prc /CADD 4,333 09
Total DIrect Costs $7,833 09
Subconsultant Costs
TeleviSIOn Inspection 22,00000
000
000
Total Subconsultant Costs $22,000 00
Fee (15% on labor, 10% on Other DIrect Costs and Subconsultants) $27,820.29
TASK TOTAL $223,233.28
Port Angeles Wastewater Services 1998
Task 6
Directed Services
DIrect Labor
CategOlylName
Professional Rate Hours Subtotal Total
J. Warburton $6731 0 0.00
R Denson $33.85 0 0.00
D. Eckhardt $45 06 0 0.00
M Flamgan $27.63 0 0.00
B. PersIch $42 19 0 000
A. Lukas $26.75 0 000
S Mernll $4773 0 000
A Molseed $30 96 0 0.00
S PIccolo $22 26 0 0.00
D. SchneIder $40 34 33 1,331.22
Engineer I $25.00 64 1,60000
Techmcal
D Aspinall $28.23 0 000
S Planclc $25.56 0 000
L Miller $26 59 0 000
Adnullistratlon
G. Beckman $23 31 0 000
J. Lindsey $1987 0 000
Word Processor $1738 0 000
Subtotal Direct Labor 97 2,931 22
InOOect Labor Cost 185% 5,422.76
Total Labor Cost $8,353 98
DIrect Costs
Te1ephonelFax 7500
PhotocopIes 75.00
Pnntlng
Fi1m/Pnnts
Travel/Parkrng
Smppmg/Postage 3818
Computer/Word Prc /CADD 169.02
Total DIrect Costs $35721
Subconsultant Costs
000
000
000
Total Subconsultant Costs $000
Fee (15% on labor, 10% on Other DIrect Costs and Subconsultants) $1,28882
TASK TOTAL $10,000.00
. EXHIBIT C
BROWN AND CALDWELL
OTHER DIRECT CHARGE RATES
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PORT ANGELES
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
Mileage:
$0.315 per mile (increases each year per IRS
reimbursement rate)
Computer Chargeouts: CADD,
graphics, engineering, word processing:
$10.25 per hour
$0.10 per copy
$2.00 per page (no telephone charges added)
Reproduction:
FAX:
nt\3772\wp\ww _ exc.doc
Exhibit C--Page 1 of 1
September 17, 1997
10 Task Name
1
2 1.0 Admin and Coordination
3 2.0 Rayonier Leachate Impact
4 3.0 Calibrate Plant Flow Meter
6 4.0 Permit NegotIations
6 6.0 III and CSO Reduction
7 5.1 Programmatic Assist
8 5.2 Financial Framework
9 5.3 Construct Model
10 City Flow Monitoring
11 5.4 Evaluate Basin 1
12 5.5 Identify Pilot Area
13 5.6 Field Investigations
14 5.8 CSO Altematives
15 5.7 Training
16 6.0 Directed Services
Project: SCHEDULE.MPP
Brown & Caldwell. Doug Schneider
Date: Tue 9/16/97 Time: 6:09 PM
Se
Jan
.
III
............. .......... .. .. .. ... .. ..........
........................... ".... ......... ... ............. ...
............................... . ..... ....... ..... .... ............ ...
............................. ....... .. . ............. .... ... .... ..... ........
:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:".:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.'.:..:.:.:. ....:...:.:.:.......:.:.......:...:.:.:...:.:.::.:.:.:..:.....::...:....:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.::.:.:.:.:.......:...
....................................... ......... .... ........ ............................
.................................... ......................... .......................
..................... ....... . ..... .... .. ....... ....... ............ ..............
..................................... .. .. ....................... ....... .........
\..
.,
...... ......... ................. ... ...... ....... ... .. .....
........................................................................... ................................................. .................................
.......... ..... .................... .. . . . ........ ......... ....................
:::::::::::::.::::::::.:::':::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'::::::':::::::':':'::':":"::::':::.'::'::::'::::::::::.:::'::::::::.:::.'::::::.::::::::':"::::::.':..::....::.
:.:.::...:.....:.:.:::...:.:.:...:...:.:.:...:.:...:.:.'.::.:".:.:'.' . ...::...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::..:.:....::.:.:.:.:.....:.... :.:.:.:. '::.'
............ ..... . ... .
......... .......... ...... .... ..
................ .... . ........ .. ......
.................. ..... ........... ..... ....
..... .........................................
..................................... .......
..............................................
................................... ....... ..
................................. ... ........
...................... ... ....... .....
... ............ . ..... .. .. ..
..
t~t@f}ft.):rrr~{:~~trr~:f~tt?{r:rr~:::::~~:f~~{:r.~~.:\.~ ::::. f~~J~::~~:~:~~~:~~n~:
11II
Task
........... ...... .. ......
...............................
.................. ......... ..
.................................
......................... .........
............... ...................
................... ...........
...............................
....................... .........
.......................... .
....... .. . ..... . ... . ..
Summary '"
Rolled Up Task
Rolled Up Milestone 0
., Rolled Up Progress
Progress
Milestone
..... .. ...
~:~rt::.~:::~:.t~~::~~.t~tkf)::r~ttr
.
...
EXHIBIT E
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/FACILITIES NONDISCRIMINATION
(The following clause is applicable unless, and to the extent that, this contract is exempt under the rules, regulations, and
relevant orders of the Secretary of labor, including 41 CFR, Ch. 60.)
During the performance of this contract, the Consultant/Contractor agrees as follows:
a The Consultant/Contractor WIll not discnminate against any employee
or applICant for employment because of race, color, rellQlOn, sex,
Vietnam era veteran status, disabled veteran condition, phYSICal or
mental handicap, or national ongin. The Consultant/Contractor WIll
take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and
that employees are treated dunng employment, WIthout regard to their
race, color, religion, sex, or national ongln. The Consultant/Contractor
WIll take affirmatIVe action to employ, advance In employment, and
otherWISe treat qualified special dIsabled or Vietnam era veterans and
handICapped Individuals WIthout discnmlnatlon based upon their
dlsabtllty or veterans' status or physical or mental handICap In all
employment actions. Such actions shall Include, but not be limited to,
the folloWIng' employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer;
recruitment or recruitment advertiSing, layoff or terminatIOn; rates of
pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training,
Including apprenticeship. The Consultant/Contractor agrees to post In
conspICuous places, available to employees and applICants for
employment, notices to be prOVIded by the local United States
Department of Labor Office setting forth the proVISIOns of thiS Equal
Opportunity/AffirmatIVe Acbon clause
b. The Consultant/Contractor WIll, In all solicitations or advertisements
for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant/Contractor,
state that all qualified applicants WIll receive consideratIOn for
employment WIthout regard to race, color, religion, sex, physical or
mental handicap, or national ongln, and that the Consultant/Contractor
IS under the legal obligation to take affirmative action to employ,
advance In employment, and otherWIse treat qualified special disabled
or Vietnam era veterans and handicapped IndiViduals WIthout
dlscnmlnatlon based upon their disability or veterans' status or
physICal or mental handicap In all employment actions. All suitable
employment openings eXIsting at contract award or occumng dunng
contract performance WIll be listed at the state employment source
offICe In the locality where the opening occurs, prOVided that thiS
listing requirement shall not apply to openings that the
Consultant/Contractor Intends to fill from WIthin Its own orgamzatlon or
under a customary and traditional employer-union hlnng agreement.
c The Consultant/Contractor will send to each labor Union or
representative of workers WIth which he has a collectIVe bargaining
agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice, to be prOVided
by the agency Contracting Officer, adVISing the said labor union or
workers' representatIVe of the Consultant/Contractor's commitments
under thiS Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action clause, and shall post
COpies of the notice In conspICuous places available to employees and
applICants for employment.
d The Consultant/Contractor WIll comply with all prOVISionS of Executive
Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules,
regulationS, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, Including,
but not limited to, the rules, regulatIOns and orders Issued by the
Secretary of Labor under the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment
Assistance Act of 1972, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC
793), as amended.
e The Consultant/Contractor WIll fumlsh alllnformabon and reports
required by ExecutIVe Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and
by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or
pursuant thereto, and WIll permit access to hiS books, records, and
accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of labor for
purposes of investigations to ascertain compliance WIth such rules,
regulations and orders.
The Consultant/Contractor WIll not, on grounds of race, color, religion,
sex, physical or mental handicap, or national ongin:
1 . Deny an IndIVIdual any services or other benefits prOVIded under
this agreement;
2. PrOVide any servlce(S) or other benefits to an mdivldual whIch are
different, or are prOVided In a different manner from those
prOVIded to others under thiS agreement;
3 Subject an Individual to segregation or separate treatment In any
manner related to the receipt of any servlce(S) of other benefits
prOVided under this agreement;
4 Deny any mdlVidual an opportunity to participate In any program
prOVIded by this agreement through the prOVISion of services or
otherWIse, or afford an opportunity to do which is different from
that afforded others under thiS agreement. The
Consultant/Contractor, In determlOlng (1) the types of services or
other benefits to be prOVided or (2) the class of IndIVIduals to
whom, or the situation In whiCh, such seMCeS or other benefits
WIll be prOVided or (3) the class of IndIVIduals to be afforded an
opportunity to partiCipate In any services or other benefits, WIll not
utilize cntena or methods of admlOlstratlOn which have the effect
of subjecting IndiViduals to dlscnmlnatlon because of their race,
color, sex, religion, national ongln, creed, or the presence of any
sensory, mental or physical handicap.
g. In the event of Consultant/Contractor noncompliance WIth the
nondlscnmlnatlon reqUirements of thiS contract or WIth any of the said
rules, regulations, or orders, thIS contract may be canceled,
terminated or suspended, In whole or In part, and the
Consultant/Contractor may be declared Ineligible for further
govemment contracts In accordance with procedures authonzed in
ExecutIVe Order No. 11246 of September 24. 1965, and such other
sanctions may be Imposed and remedIes Invoked as prOVIded In
Executive Order No 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule,
regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherWIse prOVIded
bylaw.
h The Consultant/Contractor WIll Include the prOVlSlOl'lS of paragraphs a
through g In every subcontract unless exempted by the rules,
regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor.
City of Port Angeles - [month and year)