HomeMy WebLinkAbout700 N Ennis St Technical 1998 July - BuildingTECHNICAL
Permit tI5c
Address 700 N ehnis
Project description Disyncult-t M 1i 5+t UAA
fot-u\ 0 flier t
Date the permit was finaled
Number of technical pages a
9 e Oh i+0,t Prj
9 S
r4).
s t:
6 ppitact.-;v- ()sum& 01-17–)77
RAYONIER
PORT ANGELES SITE
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING REPORT
FOR JULY 199
ter
Prepared for-
RAYONIER
Port Angeles, WA
Jack Anderson, Manager, Environmental Engineering
October 1998
FOSTER WHEELER
FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING REPORT
FOR JULY 1998
for the
RAYONIER
PORT ANGELES SITE
Prepared for
RAYONIER
PORT ANGELES, WA
Jack Anderson, Manager, Environmental Engineenng
Prepared by
Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation
10900 NE 8th Street
Bellevue, WA 98004 -4405
October 1998
CONTENTS
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 -1
1 1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES 1 -1
1.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1 -1
1.3 PLAN MODIFICATIONS 1 -5
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2 -1
2.1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 2 -1
2.2 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS 2 -1
2.3 TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS 2 -1
2.4 DIOXIN/FURAN CONCENTRATIONS 2 -2
2.5 ASBESTOS MONITORING 2 -2
2.6 LEAD MONITORING 2 -6
2.7 DEVIATIONS FROM THE MONITORING PLAN 2 -6
3 DATA QUALITY 3 -1
3 1 FLOW CHECKS 3 -1
3.2 TRIP BLANKS 3 -1
3.3 LABORATORY METHOD BLANKS 3 -1
3 4 SURROGATE RECOVERY 3 -2
3 5 LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKES 3 -2
3 6 DATA COMPLETENESS 3 -2
4 REFERENCES 4 -1
APPENDIX A DAILY SUMMARY OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA
APPENDIX B RAW DATA (AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC LIBRARY UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
G: \WP\1834 \12390.DOC •10/16/98
111
FIGURES
Figure 1. Rayomer Port Angeles Site Air Momtonng Station Location Map 1 -3
TABLES
Table 1. Dismantling Activities and Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Air Monitonng
Results 2 -3
Table 2. Dismantling Activities and Dioxm/Furan Air Monitoring Results 2 -5
Table 3 Dismantling Activities and Lead Air Monitonng Results 2 -7
Table 4 Dioxm/Furan Trip Blank Analysis Results 3 -1
Table 5. Dioxin/Furan Laboratory Method Blank Analysis Results 3 -2
GAWP \1834 \12390.DOC 00/16/98
IV
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
Rayomer is implementing an ambient air quality monitonng program during dismantling
and cleanup activities at the former Rayomer Port Angeles pulp mill site. The monitonng
program was conducted as set forth in the final Ambient Air Momtormg Plan (Foster
Wheeler Environmental 1998) This report presents the results of the air monitonng
activities for July 1998
The objectives of the Ambient Air Monitoring Plan are
1 Monitor ambient air quality for potential air pollutants related to onsite
activities,
2. Quantify potential offsite transport of project- related emissions, and
3 Assess the effectiveness of onsite emission control methods used during
dismantling and cleanup activities.
The site is a former pulp mill facility located at 700 North Ennis Street, Port Angeles,
WA. Rayomer received approval from the City of Port Angeles in July 1997 to dismantle
its former pulp mill facility Following this approval, Rayomer voluntarily committed to
develop and implement an air momtorngprogram. Air monitonng commenced in
October 1997 and is currently ongoing.
The air monitonng network consists of four sampling stations located as shown on
Figure 1 Air monitonng is conducted for potential air pollutants that may be generated
by site activities. The specific pollutants to be monitored and the sampling methods to be
used are based on the site activities conducted during the monitonng period.
Air quality action levels are established in the Ambient Air Momtonng Plan to use as an
indicator of the effectiveness of onsite emission control methods used during dismantling
and cleanup activities. In the event that single data point concentrations exceed the action
limit crrtena, the contingency plan described in the monitonng plan will be implemented.
1.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The results of the July 1998 air monitoring show that the air emission control methods
used during the dismantling work have been effective. The air samples collected around
GAWP \1834\1 2390.DOC 10/16/98
1 -1
the penmeter of the work site were well below the air quality action levels that are used
as indicators of effectiveness of emission controls. Total suspended particulate matter
(TSP) momtors were operated at four sampling stations dunng 13 monitoring events, lead
samples were collected at four sampling stations during 11 monitoring events, and
dioxin/furan monitors were operated at three sampling stations dunng two monitonng
events. The monitoring activities followed the procedures presented in the Ambient Air
Monitonng Plan.
A summary of the momtonng results follows
TSP measurements for the 13 monitonng events dunng July 1998 ranged from
10 6 to 57 1 µg /m the site action level is 150 gg/m
Dioxin/furan measurements for the two monitonng events during July 1998
ranged from 0 0003 to 0 0055 pg/m the site action level is 17 6 pg /m
(dioxm/furan concentrations are reported as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
[TCDD] equivalents [TEQs]),
Lead measurements for the 11 monitoring events during July 1998 ranged from
not detected to a concentration of 0 014 µg /m the site action level is 1.5 µg /m
No visible emissions of asbestos from dismantling activities were observed during
routine inspections, and
Onsite winds were generally light to moderate and primarily from the north
northwest through the west northwest.
Site activities during this period included general dismantling, matenal handling, and
asbestos removal. The Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), and City of Port Angeles conducted several site visits and
inspections during this reporting penod. Digester dismantling was underway dunng the
July 1998 momtonng period, including removing the bnck hmngs from the inside of the
steel digester vessels. Since the mortar used in the bnck hmng contained lead, the
removal project was performed in a constructed sealed enclosure. No other major
structure dismantling activities (e.g., recovery boiler stack dismantling, hog fuel boiler
dismantling) or site cleanup excavation activities occurred during July 1998
G:\WP\1834 \12390.DOC 10/16/98
1 -2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
0 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
Strait of Juan de Fuca
KEY
TSP High Volume Air Sampler
PS -1 High Volume Air Sampler
U Meteorological Monitoring Station
Figure 1.
Rayonier. Port Angeles Site Air Monitoring Station Location Map
1 -3
1.3 PLAN MODIFICATIONS
There are no plan modifications to be implemented based on the results of the July 1998
momtonng penod.
GAWP \1834 \12390 DOC 10/16/98
1 -5
2.1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
General dismantling, asbestos removal, and digester bnck removal activities were
underway during July 1998 These activities are presented along with the TSP
monitoring data (Table 1) and with dioxm/furan momtonng data (Table 2)
Dismantling of asbestos containing materials occurred throughout July 1998 at the
Digester Building, and Recovery- Boiler Building.
Digester dismantling, including removing the lead containing bnck linings from the
inside of the steel digester vessels, was underway during this reporting penod. The brick
hning removal work was performed in a sealed enclosure used as containment on the
digester vessel.
No other major structure dismantling activities (e g., recovery boiler stack dismantling,
hog fuel boiler dismantling) or site cleanup excavation activities occurred during July
1998
2.2 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
Onsite winds were generally light to moderate and pnmanly from the north- northwest
through the west northwest during the July 1998 sampling events. A summary of the
meteorological conditions dunng each sampling event, in the form of wind rose figures,
is presented in Appendix A. The monthly composite wind rose of the wind conditions
during the monthly sampling events is also presented in Appendix A.
2.3 TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS
The TSP monitoring results, along with the site activities on the sampling day, are
presented in Table 1 TSP monitoring events were conducted for approximately 24 hours
starting in the morning on the date noted on Table 1
TSP measurements for the 13 momtormg events during July 1998 ranged from 10 6
µg/m (Station 2 on July 6) to 57 1 µg /m (Station 1 on July 10) The site action level is
150 gg /m
G: \WP\1834 \12390.DOC •10/16/98
2-1
The highest TSP concentrations measured dunng July 1998 was 57 1 µg/m measured on
July 10 at Station 1 (located southeast of the primary dismantling area) This TSP
concentration is 38 percent of the 150 µg /m site action level. The three TSP
measurements from the other monitors on July 10 were 20.9, 23 7, and 24.3 µg /m at
stations 2, 3, and 4, respectively Wind conditions on July 10 were moderate and
predominantly from the northwest through west northwest.
2.4 DIOXIN/FURAN CONCENTRATIONS
The dioxin/furan monitoring results, along with the site activities on the sampling day,
are presented in Table 2 Dioxin/furan monitonng events were conducted for
approximately 24 hours starting in the morning on the date noted on Table 2. The
dioxin/furan toxicity equivalents (TEQs) are calculated and reported using the EPA
toxicity equivalence factors (TEFs) for the detected congeners, as described in the
Ambient Air Monitonng Plan. The TEQs are calculated using the measured value for
each detected congener If a congener was detected in some samples but not in others, a
value of one -half the detection limit was used for calculating the TEQs for those non-
detected congeners.
Dioxin/furan measurements for the five momtonng events during July 1998 ranged from
a value of 0 0003 pg/m (Station 3 on July 8) to 0 0055 pg/m (Station 1 on July 8). The
site action level is 17 6 pg/m
The highest dioxin/furan concentrations measured dunng July 1998 was 0 0055 pg /m
measured on July 8 at Station 1 (located southeast of the primary mill dismantling area)
This highest dioxin/furan concentration is approximately three hundredths of one percent
of the site action level. The dioxm/furan TEQ measurements from the other monitors on
July 8 were 0 0007 pg /m and 0 0003 pg /m at Stations 2 and 3, respectively Wind
conditions on July 8 were light to moderate, with the highest winds predominantly from
the north- northwest through the west northwest.
2.5 ASBESTOS MONITORING
Visual inspection was conducted at site locations where asbestos containing matenal
removal occurs, in accordance with the Ambient Air Monitoring Plan. No visible
emission of asbestos from dismantling activities was observed based on reports from
routine inspections by Rayomer and the dismantling contractor personnel. Asbestos
G: \WP\I834 \I2390.DOC 10/16/98
2-2
N N UM I— Oaf i a MN an I OM
N
w
Table 1 Dismantling Activities and Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Air Monitoring Results Page 1 of 2
Note: Total Suspended Particulate Site Action Level is 150 pg /m
TSP Conc. TSP Conc. TSP Conc TSP Conc.
Sample Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
Date Dismantling Activities (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3)
July 1 Demolishing the Sludge Building. Removing litharge material from 38 7 10 8 13 7 23 7
digester Hauling debris from Woodmill area.
July 6 Finished litharge removal on digester Began demolition of Screen Room 24.2 10 6 12.3 13 8
Building. Sorting steel in Woodmill area. Pulling copper from pipe bridge
from Recovery to Caustic Tank area. Crane is using wrecking ball on
Digester Building in preparation to remove No 7 digester
July 8 Hauling debris from Screen Room. Sorting and stacking metals in 10 0 20.9 23.5 26.3
Woodyard area. Removing liner from Spherical Accumulator (litharge).
Wrecking Digester Building in preparation to drop No 7 digester Loading
material from behind the deep tanks into one of the dumpsters being used for
litharge removal This was brick and blacktop picked up from the beach
west of the mill
July 9 Hauling debris from Screen Room Sorting and stacking metals in 47 7 20 0 28.0 26.6
Woodyard area. Removing liner from Spherical Accumulator (litharge).
Wrecking Digester Building in preparation to drop No 7 digester Loading
material from behind the deep tanks into one of the dumpsters being used for
litharge removal. This was brick and blacktop picked up from the beach
west of the mill.
July 10 Processing concrete and building ramp into southwest corner of Screen 57 1 20.9 23 7 24.3
Room Sorting steel at No 6 boiler Removing litharge material from No 3
accumulator Dropped No 7 digester Salvaging copper wire from turbine
room area.
July 13 Processing concrete and debris from Sludge Building. Removing copper 26 1 18.5 26 0 32.7
wire from turbine room at main substation area. Litharge removal from
No 3 accumulator Demolishing wall next to No 7 digester Removing
metal scrap from Screen Room
July 15 Processing concrete, loading metal from Screen Room. Removing flooring 16 4 11 0 15 7 22 0
from West Roll Storage. Removing equipment and piping from under
V.R.s at Recovery Pounding No 7 digester with wrecking ball.
\BECALVIN\vOL2 \WP \1834 \I2390T.DOC •5/28/98
Table 1. Dismantling Activities and Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Air Monitoring Results Page 2 of 2
Note: Total Suspended Particulate Site Action Level is 150 pg /m
TSP Conc TSP Conc. TSP Conc. TSP Conc.
Sample Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
Date Dismantling Activities (µg /m (µg /m (µg/m (µg/m
July 17 Sorting debris and salvaging some equipment in Screen Room Moved 47 7 14 0 15.3 22.3
No 7 digester into litharge containment area. Working at V.R. Processed
concrete around Recovery area. Removed material from Finishing Room
area. Demolished control room at chlorine dioxide generator Demolished
Woodmill Load Center Building and block building main transformer pad at
Power House.
July 20 Removing pipe from Recovery Building. Processing steel and concrete at 43 0 18 6 26 7 25.3
Woodyard and Administration sites. Removing floor at Finishing /West Roll
Storage. Hauling debris from Screen Room area to Administration area for
processing. Removing litharge from No. 7 digester
July 21 Removing.pipe.from Recovery Building. _Processing steel.and.concrete at 22.5 19.2 41 7 24 9
N Woodyard and Administration sites. Removing floor at Finishing/West Roll
Storage. Hauling :debris•from Screen Room area Administrationarea for
processing. Removing .litharge .from No. 7 digester Removing concrete
base (jack hammering) of stock tanks by Screen Room. Dropped incline
chip conveyor from Chip Storage to Digester Building.
July 22 Jack hammering concrete tanks by Screen Room Hauling concrete debris 43 1 27 0 34 4 34 7
from pile at Administration area to east of the East Roll Storage area to pick
debris out. Finishing up litharge removal from No 7 digester Removing
pipe from Recovery Removing floor and other debris from Finishing
Room
July 27 Processing and sorting steel in Woodyard. Processing concrete in Screen 56.3 45 6 39 0 29 0
Room and Administration Building areas. Getting ammonia tank ready to
move. Hauling debris to the waste pile by East Roll from Screen Room and
Administration areas.
July 29 Demolition work and material sorting at Sludge Building. Processing 53 6 20 6 26 0 23 7
concrete and rebar at Administration site. Hauling debris on mill site
Cutting up accumulator at Digester area.
\\BECALVIN\VOL2 \WP \1834 \12390T.DOC 05/28/98
111111 11111 111111 Mil IND ON MIS 11111 111111 NO MIN 1111M Olt 1111 NM 111111
MI Mill INN III INK MO MN NO MOB MO Mill INN INN INN 'INN NM OW
Table 2. Dismantling Activities and Dioxm/Furan Air Monitoring Results
Note: Dioxin/Furan Site Action Level —17.6 pg /m TCDD TEQ
Sample
Dates
July 8
Dismantling Activities
Hauling debris from Screen Room. Sorting and stacking metals in
Woodyard area. Removing liner from Spherical Accumulator litharge).
Wrecking Digester Building in preparation to drop No 7 digester
Loading material from behind the deep tanks into one of the dumpsters
being used for litharge removal This was brick and blacktop picked up
from the beach west of the mill
July 22 Jack hammering concrete tanks by Screen Room Hauling concrete
debris from pile at Administration area to east of the East.Roll Storage
area to pick debris out. Finishing up litharge removal from No. 7
digester Removing pipe from Recovery Removing floor and other
debris from Finishing Room
\\BECAL V [N\ V OL2\ W P\ 1834 12390T. DOC .5/28/98
Dioxin/Furan Dioxin/Furan Dioxin/Furan
TEQ Conc. TEQ Conc. TEQ Conc
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3
(pg/m TEQ) (pg /m TEQ) (pg/m TEQ)
0 0055 0 0007 0 0003
0 0051
0 0010
0 0003
monitonng is conducted to conform to the site action level of no visible emissions of
asbestos.
2.6 LEAD MONITORING
The lead monitonng results, along with the site activities on the sampling day, are
presented in Table 3 Lead monitoring events were conducted concurrent with TSP
monrtonng events. Bnck fining removal from digesters was underway during the lead
monitonng events.
Lead measurements for the 11 monitoring events during July 1998 ranged from not
detected (41 of 44 samples) to 0 014 µg /m (Station 1 on July 10) This maximum lead
concentration is less than 1 percent of the site action level of 1.5 µg /m No lead was
detected in the three measurements from the other stations on July 10
2.7 DEVIATIONS FROM THE MONITORING PLAN
The July 1998 monitoring program followed the procedures presented in the final
Ambient Air Monitoring Plan.
G: \WP \1834 \12390.DOC 10/16/98
2 -6
INN NO Mt Olt 111111 VIE 11111111 "III MB MN ill SIMI SIMI Mt 1111111 MIR 111111.
Table 3. Dismantling Activities and Lead Air Monitoring Results Page 1 of 2
Note: Lead Site Action Level is 1.5 pg /m
TSP Conc TSP Conc TSP Conc TSP Conc.
Sample Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
Date Dismantling Activities (11g/m (1- (µg/m (1
July 1 Demolishing the Sludge Building. Removing litharge material from 0 012 ND ND ND
digester Hauling debris from Woodmill area.
July 6 Finished litharge removal on digester Began demolition of Screen ND ND ND ND
Room Building. Sorting steel in Woodmill area. Pulling copper from
pipe bridge from Recovery to Caustic Tank area. Crane is using
wrecking ball on Digester Building in preparation to remove No 7
digester
July 8 Hauling debris from Screen Room. Sorting and stacking metals in ND ND ND ND
Woodyard area. Removing liner from Spherical Accumulator litharge).
Wrecking Digester Building in preparation to drop No 7 digester
Loading material from behind the deep tanks into one of the dumpsters
being used for litharge removal. This was brick and blacktop picked up
iv from the beach west of the mill.
July 9 Hauling debris from Screen Room. Sorting and stacking metals in 0 013 ND ND ND
Woodyard area. Removing liner from Spherical Accumulator (litharge).
Wrecking Digester Building in preparation to drop No 7 digester
Loading material from behind the deep tanks into one of the dumpsters
being used for litharge removal. This was brick and blacktop picked up
from the beach west of the mill.
July 10 Processing concrete and building ramp into southwest corner of Screen 0 014 ND ND ND
Room. Sorting steel at No 6 boiler Removing litharge material from
No 3 accumulator Dropped No 7 digester Salvaging copper wire
from turbine room area.
July 13 Processing concrete and debris from Sludge Building. Removing ND ND ND ND
copper wire from turbine room at main substation area. Litharge
removal from No 3 accumulator Demolishing wall next to No 7
digester Removing metal scrap from Screen Room
\\BECALVIN\VOL2 \WP \1834 \12390T.DOC •5/28/98
N
00
Table 3. Dismantling Activities and Lead Air Monitoring Results Page 2 of 2
Note: Lead Site Action Level is 1.5 gg /m
TSP Conc TSP Conc TSP Conc TSP Conc
Sample Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4
Date Dismantling Activities (1.1g /m (µg /m (µg /m (µg /m
July 15 Processing concrete, loading metal from Screen Room. Removing ND ND ND ND
flooring from West Roll Storage Removing equipment and piping from
under V.R.s at Recovery Pounding No 7 digester with wrecking ball
July 17 Sorting debris and salvaging some equipment in Screen Room Moved ND ND ND ND
No 7 digester into litharge containment area. Working at V.R.
Processed concrete around Recovery area. Removed material from
Finishing Room area. Demolished control room at chlorine dioxide
generator Demolished Woodmill Load Center Building and block
building main transformer pad at Power House
July 20 Removing pipe from Recovery Building. Processing steel and concrete ND ND ND ND
at Woodyard and Administration sites Removing floor at
Finishing /West Roll Storage Hauling debris from Screen Room area to
Administration area for processing. Removing litharge from No 7
digester
July 21 Removing pipe from Recovery Building. Processing steel and concrete ND ND ND ND
at Woodyard and Administration sites. Removing floor at
Finishing/West Roll Storage Hauling debris from Screen Room 'area 'to
Administration area for processing. Removing litharge from No 7
digester Removing concrete base (jack hammering) of stock tanks by
Screen Room Dropped incline chip conveyor that ran from Chip
Storage to Digester Building.
July 22 Jack hammering concrete tanks by Screen Room Hauling concrete ND ND ND ND
debris from pile at Administration area to east of the East Roll Storage
area to pick debris out. Finishing up litharge removal from No 7
digester Removing pipe from Recovery Removing floor and other
debris from Finishing Room
ND None detected.
\\BECALVIN\VOL2 \WP \1834 \12390T.DOC .5/28/98
1110 1011 11111 NIB lilt -1111 IMP 1111 1101 NS '1101 11111 1101 NM 1101 111111 11111 1111111 INN
3.1 FLOW CHECKS
3.2 TRIP BLANKS
3. DATA QUALITY
One point flow checks on the air samplers were conducted before and after each
dioxm/furan sample was collected, and before each TSP sample was collected.
Trip blanks were analyzed along with the regular TSP and dioxm/furan samples. Tnp
blanks indicate the level of contamination of the sample media during shipping and
handling.
Thirteen TSP tnp blanks were analyzed during the July 1998 sampling period. The mass
of the 13 tnp blanks ranged from not detected to 0 0010 g /sample
Two dioxm/furan trip blanks were analyzed during the July 1998 sampling penod. These
results are presented on Table 4
Table 4. Dioxm/Furan Trip Blank Analysis Results
Sample Date Dioxin/Furan TEQ Mass (pg /sample)
July 8 None detected
July 22 None detected
Eleven lead tnp blanks were analyzed during the July 1998 sampling period. No lead
was detected in the trip blanks.
3.3 LABORATORY METHOD BLANKS
Two dioxm/furan laboratory method blanks were analyzed along with the field samples.
Method blanks are laboratory quality control samples that monitor the concentration of
contamination that may be introduced into field samples as a result of processing in the
laboratory These results are presented on Table 5
G: \WP \1834 \12390.DOC 10/16/98
3 -1
Table 5. Dioxin/Furan Laboratory Method Blank Analysis Results
Sample Date Dioxin/Furan TEQ Mass (pg /sample)
July 8
July 22
None detected
None detected
Nine lead method blanks were analyzed dunng the July 1998 sampling period. No lead
was detected in the method blanks.
3.4 SURROGATE RECOVERY
Surrogate compounds are also referred to as internal standards and are added to all field
and laboratory quality assurance samples (method blanks, laboratory control spikes) A
surrogate is a compound that is similar to the compound (or compounds) of interest, but
that is not normally found in environmental samples. Surrogates are added to samples to
monitor the effects of 1) the environmental matrix, 2) the sample preparation process, and
3) the analytical process on the recovery efficiency of sample contaminants. For July, the
average surrogate recovery rates were within the acceptable range of 50 to 150 percent.
3.5 LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKES
Two laboratory control spikes (LCSs) were analyzed along with the field samples. The
LCS is prepared using a "blank" matnx (such as a clean filter) A known quantity of all
of the individual doxin/Furan isomers is added to the LCS sample. The LCS is processed
through the same laboratory preparation and analysis steps as the field samples, and
monitors the accuracy of the laboratory preparation and analysis process. Average July
LCS recoveries were within the acceptable range of 50 to 150 percent.
3.6 DATA COMPLETENESS
No samples were lost or broken in shipment and all submitted samples were analyzed.
All data are considered usable
G: \WP \1834\12390.DOC 10/16/98
3 -2
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
G: \WP\1834 \12390.DOC 10/16/98
4 REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation. 1998 Ambient Air Monitoring Plan, Rayonier Port
Angeles Site. Prepared by Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, Bellevue,
Washington. February 1998
4 -1
G: \WP\1834\12390.DOC 9/28/98
APPENDIX A
DAILY SUMMARY OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Wind rose figures for each sampling event are presented in this appendix (Figures A -1
through A -4) A wind rose depicts the joint frequency of occurrence, in percent, of wind
speed and wind direction categones for a particular location and time penod. The radials of
the wind rose indicate the direction from which the wind is blowing. The length of each
radial indicates the frequency of occurrence for that direction, and the width of each radial
indicates the wind speed class. Each wind rose figure includes the period from when the
first sampling monitor was turned on until the last monitor was turned off. A composite
wind rose of the meteorological data during each sampling event is also presented. The
wind roses are based on 10- minute observations obtained from the on -site meteorological
monitoring station.
G: \WP\1834 \12390.DOC •9/28/98
APPENDIX A
DAILY SUMMARY OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA
A -1
w
G: \WP\1834 \12390.DOC •9/29/98
July 1
WINO SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
0 3 7 9 >9
c
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S)
July 8
20% 20%
15% 15%
5% \5%
s
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
O 1 3 3 -5 5-7 7-9 >9
C)
E
AVERAGE WINO SPEED (M /S) 2 39
99
FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
A -2
July 6
S
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
O 1 -3 7-9 >9
c
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S) 2 42
July 9
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
0 1 -3 >9
E
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S) 2 34
Figure A -1
Daily Wind Roses Sampled From
July 1 to July 9 1998
1
G \WMI 834 \12390.DOC .9/28/98
July 10
5
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
0 1 -3 3 -5 5-7
AVERAGE WINO SPEED (MIS) 3 16
July 15
N
WINO SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
O 1 -3 3 -5 5 -7 7-9 >9
AVERAGE WINO SPEED (M /S)
V FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
A -3
July 13
N
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
0 1 3 3 -5 6-7 -9 >9
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S)
July 17
WINO SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
0 t
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S)
2 53
25
Figure A -2.
Daily Wind Roses Sampled From
July 10 to July 17 1998
1
July 20
s
WINO SPEED CLASSES (M /51
0 1 -3 3-5 5-7 7 9 9
AVERAGE WINO SPEED (M /S) 70
July 22
GAWP 1 834\ 12390.DOC .9/28/98
s
WINO SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
0
E
FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
A -4
N
s
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
O 1
c
AVERAGE WINO SPEED (M /S) 1 79
July 27
s
July 21
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
O 3 3-55-7 7 -9
c
AVERAGE WINO SPEED (M /S) 2 58 AVERAGE WINO SPEED (M /S) 1 42
Figure A -3.
Daily Wind Roses Sampled From
July 20 to July 27 1998
1
V FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
w
BECALVIN\VOL2 \WP\1834 \12390.DOC •9/29/98
July 29
N
20%
15
10%
5
WIND SPEED CLASSES (M /S)
3 -5 5 -7 7 -9 >9
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S) 2 63
July Monthly Composite
5
WIND SPEED CLASSES
1 -3 3 -5 -9 MEM
AVERAGE WIND SPEED (M /S) 2 03
A -5
(M /S)
E
Figure A-4.
Daily Wind Rose Sampled on July 29 and
July Monthly Composite
G 183gU2390 9121098
APP ENDIX B
,RAW. DATA
G: \WP\1834 \12390.DOC •9/28/9S
APPENDIX B
Note These raw data are available for review at Port Angeles Public
Library Under Separate Cover