Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutField Reports Pile Number: GEOENGINEERSSS FIELD REPORT 19452 001 00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/30/12 (Fri) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -15 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1430 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Corigruction Observation Sunny, -45 F 0.25 hr l4 arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or 0 Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable a Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video t We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 4 piles, for a total of 195 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 350 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head was approximately 10 to 30 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 119 to 124 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center 1 bars were inserted into the holes. The photo to the right shows the locations of w it AP 306 and AP 308) 1 ar I 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE 4011111Ml A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 aNNO This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DIscLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 March 30, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an "T* approximately 1 to 3 foot drop in grout level following installation. This drop in d i A grout is likely due to consolidation of x the grout or some outward movement R of the grout into the surrounding soils. It is our opinion that this drop in grout level does not represent a problem with the piles, since crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of 0, pile elevation to maintain adequate steel cover. Vol, The contractor reported a clog in the cir 1 grout line at the tip of the auger when IN attempting to grout pile AP313 (see photo to the right). The auger was completely withdrawn from the hole in order to remove the clog, and the hole"' v m" was then redrilled in the same location. a. x ,,,,,...,,,,„,,4; At the beginning of the second grouting a attempt the contractor reporte another clog in the grout line. The auger was completely removed from the hole for a second time to remove the clog. The hole was redrilled again, and again the line clogged. It was determined that the cork used to plug the grout line during augering had become unseated during drilling on the last three installation attempts and allowed soil to enter the line and clog it. On the fourth attempt, the contractor pumped grout through the line during augering as well as during withdrawl, and the pile was installed successfully. Piles AP312 and AP313 near the shipping office are not shown on the attached pile layout sheet. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. This completes the deep pile installation, to the best of our knowledge. There are still additional short piles to be installed, but we understand from NPI that we do not need to be on site for installation of those piles. I ll it o r Cogeneration Project I' E 1 Of Afippa: fy .rla, w •s I on V Srto 1 I 1 El I I •---1--4, ii 4 iit I I -4-4 1=1 i 1 i 0 0 1 a I t 1 --1 miri. -1--t _4,___#__..*,_ 0 .*F. -1-11- _a' 1H IJ_ T 1 1: 1...= 1 I ,.-1 I 11 1 .0- -J 1 I 1 I i I I I 1 L,, .1__ 0- i 1 i I 1 I ------4 i I 1 1 ---t Li---- ,*,____k______4 ,-_4-. 1 i--11 e 1 ti. —111 1.0 I j !_j I I -0 'Al 0 D ---4 0 'J _o .01 -7 1 1 I 4, At D 4 1 i 1 I I 11 I 1 i i c-*'---4------4-----4------4-----------'t----- .1, 6 6 4 (it 1 1 0 Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously Y E PIPE E R s 11710 Elrrr Ewer .1 11710 r TOWER k va t w xs firI TOWER Project I I rawEa M Cogeneration rojee I of Nippon Paper Industries Mill Site, w F- Callam County, Washington 1 t.r. i i 1 Pr To ,...1';',°a I L il I 1 I _fi 1P J BEI I tea. o -qt- 4� 0 O i9- c 6 —rte I :I r i TOP OF PILE 'CUT -OFF' ELEVATIONS E LI Ca v/ r. ur I 9 ewwt r. i z Off 09 ,1,101FAN O O O O O O 9 O O L.,,,-.." r Y L I On f. r Q_ LJ �Q TOP OF PILE 'CUT -OFF' ELEVATIONS 1 n An C n a -0 1 I••....� 1 Il_ e A z O t I J1 1 F J 1 -0" TOP 01 PILE 'CUT -0FF' ELEVATIONS t a. ti i w. EI a 0 ISIS t I l r 1 File Number: GEOENGINEERSSS FIELD REPORT 9452 001 -00 Project 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility AfThurs) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -15 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1700 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Rain, -45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 19 piles, for a total of 191 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 375 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head was approximately 5 to 20 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 116 to 130 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. t After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long 4 steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center i L. j bars were inserted into the holes. E I.: k -0460 V a ►-r a .,r is., w (t t a l I r 1".:, P a"" fi a ,,e w r v a r s ;I..: .11,..4',k:':rii4,115.1.:...14L,, '',,r4 1"': 1'' 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 ammo Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. lk X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 aaWHO This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 March 29, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 1 to 3 foot drop in grout level following installation. This drop in grout is likely due to consolidation of the grout or some outward movement of the grout into the surrounding sous. P m It is our opinion that this drop in grout_ x level does not represent a problem with the piles, since crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of w �pile elevation to maintain adequate steel cover. a :0,.„. Based on our obse, it is our opinion that the piles rvations installed today have been installed in general ::,.,...1:, accordance with the project plans and specifications. 1 I" 1rEE Cogeneration Project 1 i 1 of Nspon Paper r I sy du w s aso trios ng M mill Site 1 i 1 1 5 .1_-___, -c) 1 iT 3 i 3 0 r T. 1 0 1 I L —7-T-T--c) 1 1,111 1 it L *1 141 3 7!.7. I .1 i 1 1 E e--- +-1.- it! T ar 1 I N 1 i 1 e- .--4=t-,,=, 1 I 4 •-ffi I I. I E5-.° I I 1 I I 1 1r S .1411 I ,Ia :1 i I I Izza=1 .L_____ I .6 T I 1.- ob d3 c'S ob 4 4 1. ei 1 1 t 111_ 11 1,----1---------g j I I i 1 •-e-0 ''it 1 I 1 I i 4:- 7 o 4=- 13 4- 5-- 'F 1 e 1 1 1 1 -1---1-- I i 1' i lea* 19 1 I 1 1 i p AD 4 .0 I a .0 JD JD .111t .D ./S A I I 4 4 4 :i, 4 43 0 Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously 1 File Number: GEOENGINEERSS FIELD REPORT 19452 001 00 Project: Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/28/12 (Wed) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -14 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1745 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Partly Cloudy, -45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 21 piles, for a total of 172 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 350 to 375 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head was approximately 5 to 20 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 117 to 121 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long T steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. a- fi fir c 6 t. e b 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for O job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 March 28, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 1 to 3 foot drop in grout level following installation. This drop in grout is likely due to consolidation of 41, mow the grout or some outward movement I 9 of the grout into the surrounding soils. .p" It is our opinion that this drop in grout F level does not represent a problem with r. r .e the piles, since crews poured these pile k rift locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation to maintain adequate steel cover. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today a have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. T Cogeneration Project 1 4 9 :1: Pa MC P 1 r1.1;6."WTCS Mm 54 1 I I -e I i 0 is z i 0 I 0 1 1 7 —21----1--- I ±71._ 7 e.-... -141'7 I Lr I I 1 1 I I i -0 _9 a----- -4- 41= 1 T 7 I 1 1 N i 1 I 1______L, I I .9 —e- 1 1 i s ..1 it 1 i i 1 11-4,„, 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 -.6.... 1 .z- 1 iz rr 1 t i j I 1 0 (2) to 1--1.—h Halli 0 IP. 4 —17 1, t ---4 j la =-..-4-.- ---1-----€ 1 I 1 1 i i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 4- 4 JD 10 4 o a --o- ---1--i 1 1 i i 4 4 4 4 -----i t ..-1 6 (L.) 4 4 4 4 1! 0 c 0 0 1 Piles Installed Today Piles Installed Previously R File Number: GEOENGINEERSSS� FIELD REPORT 19452 001 00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/27/12 (Tues) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -13 Prepared b Location: Ti P p y oca[ o Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1630 1 of 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Partly Cloudy, -45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 19 piles, for a total of 151 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural g rout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 350 to 400 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head was approximately 5 to 20 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 117 to 126 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed 1)1 from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long 1. steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center ii bars were inserted into the holes. 4'....' ef.- 1 ft,-‘-: -e 3,x a 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. My conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. T i m Ba PE 3 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 March 27, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 1 to 3 foot drop in grout fluctuating g installation due to groundwater elevation. 3 level following Crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation. The contractor reported a clog in the grout line at the tip of the auger when attempting to grout pile AP145. The auger was completely withdrawn from the hole in order to remove the clog. The hole was then redrilled in the same location and the pile was installed successfully. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. „..i. I u o'i t„ 0 1 co '5 w c, T iy 4 01 1 Z3 4 i 1 1 I i TO TO 4—•• I E 0 0 e v VI 1 T I 1 1 1 a caLu I 0 0 1 El .1 1 1 t t 1 0- --I 1 i w J T 1 —0 1 1 1 i l 1 1 11 1 1 1 I e l I o o I c' 411 k 1 nil 111 141 4 -----1° 1 I I I I I I e PI— 1 r ily el 41 0 .1 41 1/ I A 0 1 -1 a il 1 1 ----1-_ 4 1 e •1 40 I! A 1 I —14- 41-- ---t.-..- --i- --e I i I 1 ALF T. 0 1 1 1 li 4 P 1 .0-- e "3 1 I 1 4 '1 1 -1-- hi 11 1 1 1 i i 1 A q JI 1 1 --O I 1 I 11 A 104 0 n r 1 1 0 Ili_ 1 11 1 1 1 -w------ --o .L i 0, q ---0 -c) l 7 1 I o, 1 k4--'-'0 1--- i l— 1 1 *I i A .1 I C) a I I I --0 i I ii 1 71 IL___• d a .1 1 i____ 1 i 'i i 1 1 1 1 I. 0 1 .11 1 Mom 1 -------c) ---c1 1 1 0 i 0 1 1 i I I 1- n" ----------0 -0 1 _----=11,--,--* 1—* F 4-411 f DAI _____L___„ 1 0 1-1-.1., 4.___ <2• 1 -4 1 I i 1 i 4 File Number: G EO E N G I N E E R S FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 Project: Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/26/12 (Mon) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -12 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1500 1 of 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Overcast, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 12 piles, for a total of 132 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 350 to 375 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head was approximately 5 to 20 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 116 to 131 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed F from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long 4 steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. r -N_ isms modiat 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 -26 -12 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 -27 -12 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure). if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452- 001 -00 March 26, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an it3 ly I• approximately 1 to 2 foot drop in grout is level following installation due to qAT fluctuating groundwater elevation. �`rgir Crews poured these pile locations with 1 additional grout to top of pile elevation. i .of f The contractor reported a clog in the t +e grout line at the tip of the auger when attempting to grout pile AP126. The 'rte auger was completely withdrawn from the hole in order to remove the clog, and the hole was then redrilled in the a9..+ t k same location. At the beginning of the` second grouting attempt the contractor reported another clog in the grout line. The auger was completely removed from the hole for a second time to remove the clog. It was determined that the cork used to plug the grout line during augering had become unseated during drilling on the last two installation attempts and allowed soil to enter the line and clog it. The contractor welded a bead around the inside of the grout line at the auger tip to hold the cork more securely. Pile location AP129 was then drilled in the same location for a third time and installed successfully. The installation of piles AP128, AP144 and AP150 was paused between the augering and grouting phases to fix a leaking small hydraulic hose connected to the auger motor. An attempt to repair the hose was made during the installation of pile AP150, and it was completely removed during the installation of pile AP144. A new hose was installed during the installation of pile AP128. We understood from our discussions with the contractor that without this particular hose, the auger motor was only able to run on a high speed setting (as opposed to low speed). Piles AP127, AP128 and AP144 were drilled and installed successfully with the auger motor on the fast setting. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. A 1 •1 n. 6. cn 2 i TS a) 1, CO RS 'ell/ 1. 4- 4- in in 1 0_ I 1 ■.$1. C C t Cl z E I (7., CI I I I D II_ I vi In 0.1 CU tai I' 1 II 0 0 1 i 7 1 I I I I 1 -#1-- 41 4 —0 1 -11.----1F--CI II --o -s 1 T i 1 j 11 17 i 1 1 j I i 1 I (lie 1 1 1 1 1 0 ti 1 i L...,. I I l l' I I 0 D I D I I J Jo ¶J LO i111 l fl i n 0 0 Ili__ Fl....- 1 ill 1111111 Ili •1 ii 1 A i k I 1 0 ji 1 1 1 0 4 0 1 j 1 0 ,k,, Ill lk 1 0 i: T T _...8 0 1 01 EV. -----1- I 1 _i_______. •14- II) 1, 1 I a.-- '2 11 I 1 T 1 ---e) 1 1 .--1---------= 10 -----A--*---o ----T 1 i I i ii I■ki 0 c„ 1,___ 1 1 i j ej ei iii 1 I 1 -----------k— ---T 10 1----- F lk I 1 11 I 1 1 I 1 E ---y. 1-- E13 1 1 1 1P1 11 cl I 1 1 1 lio! 11 i jl 10 T 1 —,,,I ---c, P 1 I 1 0 0 1 1 i I 11 ----------olt-- 7 7 0 I 1 4 ----------(D Ill 1 I e l 1 t- 4 .1 1 -e 1 File Number: GEOENGINEERSS� FIELD REPORT 19452 001 -00 c Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/23/12 (Fri) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 206.728.2674 Owner Time of Arrival: Report Number: Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -11 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1000 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Sunny, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or 0 Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by CO PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles FILE During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 2 piles, for a total of 120 to date. Each of t 1Qfl d rilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 375 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head was approximately 5 feet during installation of both piles. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 121 to 128 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center t bars were inserted into the holes. t= i ,a'. i MA V, r v A t Lo 1 .,:i 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 -23 -12 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 -23 -12 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout R u 9 Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File MAR 27 CI BUILDING DIVISION File No. 19452 001 -00 March 23, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 1 to 2 foot drop in grout level following installation due to fluctuating groundwater elevation. Crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation. Due to the simultaneous pour of the Steam Turbine Generator (STG) Building foundation and installation of the Boiler Building augercast piles, the y" f i" concrete and grout supplier could not j� j deliver grout and concrete to the site a �.r F��+�i�F'S� /���h�• aN /!fit. iS n fast enough. Based on this conflict, JH Kelly decided to suspend pile installation for the day and resume when the STG Building pour was complete. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. 1 v I 1.1 i c r E Cogeneration Project ii 1 0 r N i r— l I 0 0 0-4--+ o 0 -1-0 1 F .0 II 1-4-414----------“ 4 Li) 1 L ieg'i limo _41_1 0 0 0 I I 7 7 1 T- t 1 ifri Aw 1 —kEt----1 1, I I 1- --h t I—, 1 1 I 1 9----- .0 API it I 1 E. 1 _I .f." __i_____I__ -J—L1-- 4- 4.. --H--I -------jr! 4..-.4i-----0 1 IT I—I 1 7 -1-- 'Im6j 1 I F i la I 1 1 '1 I 1 1 I 0---I-E-i. l—1 1 1 1 I I i 1 I .■I 1 II] I I I 1 I r7f -7 T 4 7 -c F rill 0 1 i 0. C j 1 I I 7 f a. a, so i 1 I i i ,-,--/Ei -Ar-----do------4---- 1 i 1 1 --t-Ad 4 -----1--, i D 1.• 1 1 II -ci Faiiii 1 1 .6 0 -Q .4 .0 4 4 —,----i-f--- --4 6 6 4 ,t, 0 6 G 0 r■ Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously File Number GEOENGINEERS FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/22/12 (Thurs) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -10 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1600 1 of 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Sunny, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 17 piles, for a total of 118 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 to 375 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 5 to 20 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 117 to 126 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.5 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed -v. from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. l.. I 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 -22 -12 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 -23 -12 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 Mar-ch 22, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 1 to 3 foot drop in grout level following installation due to fluctuating groundwater elevation. Crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation. At the beginning of the grouting phase w, during installation of pile AP129, the pump operator reported that the grout rl line was plugged at the auger tip. The auger was completely removed from sataikillow the hole and the rock plug was removed from the auger. The pile was then redrilled in the same location and grouted successfully. Total delay was w, 1 on the order of 10 minutes. Based on my observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. !I ,e 1 t Cogeneration Project L 11 r Cf l E f i F I P /;r7I C ZI 'ACMcs ly e r I 1 i 1 V T i i r I i I E I I i la.________,„ 1 1 1 _1 1 D --1 —a I —4--e ---------o 11 i 0 0 0 I I s• i i i I I T T r 1 a 1 I i 9--- 1 I 1 N ..4_ _1 2 I 1 t —1._ 7 r.-= 1--. i 1 f 41 i I 4- PD 1 I. 1' 1 .i 1 .47.,i* 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i ----*L .-4-• L' ks5= 1 1 1 r TL. 01 c 4 4 (L.=-*- 1 1 4P--1-1----------4 1 I I 0 _1 J_ t 0 11 GAL el h 1 0 0 -17 EP o 1 -4 0 1 1 i I_D DD 4 4 4 1 Ifffi 1 I v .ii JD 1.0 A A --4---------- 1 1 1 I 4 A i t--*---E-4 la -A----ik-E- -41 t 1 1 1 1 ---4-----1 11 1 I 1 6 6 6 4 5 0 6 GO Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously 1 l I r File Number: GEOENGINEERSS FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/21/12 (Wed) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1630 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Sunny, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or 0 Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 20 piles, for a total of 101 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 to 400 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 15 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 5 to 15 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximate 16 to 124 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were demined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.75 strokes per cubic yard of grout. �`F 1,1 tr. i After the auger was completely removed +�,yr from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long a► steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center t 1� r ....r...-,.. bars were inserted into the holes. `l i t� li" i t „Il ,r s i. y RECEIVED VI MAR 2 7 k. 2032 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 0 THIS FIELD RT IS REPO FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Ba P 3 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not b e responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), i provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The orig document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 March 21, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 2 to 3 foot drop in grout level following installation due to fluctuating groundwater elevation. l manly �i Crews poured these pile locations with g additional grout to top of pile elevation. Based on my observations, it is our iii opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general 1:a accordance with the project plans and specifications. l a r I. li IN j Cogeneration Project r E ii of Abppor: Paper filauStaeS Mx .5,t, i i ruo. Co n unty. Wastunglo 1 [ril_ I I I 1 I 0 1 it-----1---0- 0 0 i o 7 I 'I 7 -19 -----4---* I +-1- -L I I I 1 I I —I iif 7 1 H N '-L __I _f_7 ._____i _1 i__ 'Zin i -1-- 1 I 1 i --i---- 1 .7..-- 4.-77;_!:_. .1 T r ---t.1-=__ 1 1 11 cl Iiil --7— 7— 0 0 7 .-=.-_4-_-_____.<5_ 1 i i 0 i JP L it i i i um 1 1 1 m• JI .0 _0 JP JI Ar i i 1 1 1 -1 -9 -o----#E---- 4-- 4 i I 1 1 i I 1 I 4- .4 -it- Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously Vi )tIf JCL V File Number: GEOENGINEERSO FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 ou■IIIP Project: Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 3/20/12 (Tues) O SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0730 FR -8 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1745 1 of 3 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: MO Construction Observation Rain, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: 0 Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable III Safety Hazards Were Addressed by 0 PPE 0 Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor), Gary Holmquist with NPI, and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles �J During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 11 piles, for a total of 81 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 to 375 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 15 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 5 to 15 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 116 to 132 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16.25 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed i ,e 3� t from each of the holes, the 40 foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center a 4 i bars were inserted into the holes. jf.. s QMµ 4 1 y A ,,...44 4y +i. ift 1 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 3 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 3 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsibl e for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 21, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an /G"` approximately 2 to 3 foot drop in grout l level following installation due to �W` fluctuating groundwater elevation. hit,, Crews poured these pile locations with T 0 r lr additional grout to top of pile elevation. Based on my observations, it is our MM a ',aM a r,' ..r„ opinion that the piles installed today f., have been installed in general r .te a accordance with the project plans and specifications. 1 1 1 V E Cogeneration Project i II r E or ,Vp.pan Pa lnCusfnes ,Mef! 5,te i i o I i C deWla rn Caunly Wasningfon i s7--- I -a-- I 1 l L o 14 p 1 I I- i I l C" I "I 1 I -r I 01 T J e I I ��m 1 I iII I._ o l I I `h 1- I 1.- 1 I o- P- r o ..P 1 e, I ti I 1 I ..I 1 1 1 I cr14 1 1 I I 1 b 4 b 1 I 1p-- 9-- 1- I 1 tt 1-1 j 1 i I ter- ter- `s-- -Ak-- L -t i i i i j i b1 i i -4 0 i s i 9- I 1 1 M23 i Jj� AD 4 .0 .fl 11 I 4 .0 -0 P ..0 .0 -Eil I I I I 1 1 I-1 I II 1 i 4 4 4 4-- -ft- b 6 b b 6 bo o Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously File Number: GEOENGINEERSZi7 FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 2/24/12 (Fri) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0715 FR -7 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 0900 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Partly Cloudy, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video W e visited the site to observe installation of auger cast pi for the Biom Cogeneration Facility located at the N ippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Dav wi th JH Kelly (contracto Gary H with NPI, and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 2 piles, fora total of 70 to date.. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth t t a rr� m of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads f attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by 3 Ty a drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump t x Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 f seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for 1 each pile. The grout head ranged from 10 to 30 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 124 to 126 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 2 24 12 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. My conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 24, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 2 to 3 foot drop in grout level following installation due to fluctuating groundwater elevation. Crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation. f,;.';. Based on my observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. 11 ....2,..' 1; i P 4. 0 ct 3...i ,i a$ •5 0 cu S 1 i— 0- .9. 9 1 e t I. 11 4 k A 1 1 49, 1 CO (13 4- 4- 1 C C CL I I 0 I 6 tig 1 T 1 1 1 1 11 ,..1 1 1 I 1 74 cu cu 1 1 i i, 1 1 tivh-' I I 1 0 0 -t-- ----4--- 1 11 I rLa T--- 1 4 _____II i 1 il l 1 i ..w CI: ,01 I I w I i 1 1 7 1 z 7) 7 iir„ I 0,--A--*--- --0 -r- 7 IDh lill Din 11 0 D 0 6 0 6 tL, --P I I I 1 '1.- 1 11 I I I 1 1 e 0 I C.) 11 1 A A f ip. 14 1 I l i 1 I i rt, 2 il l __I_ li II I j1 0 0 i _ii-__p__,1 L I I i T— ---1 ---e II i A ii 1 i il 1 H 1-----• A! 1 11 1 J 1 '1 -7 I T lir '1 -------A-01+-1---- 1 4 t i FP 11 1 i I 1 1 eh. 1 lj Si S i e l -J --0 iv I 0 I L_ I 1 i 6 '11 1 I I 1 I in ff n I 1----- F-- --,a ri 1 1 1 r+ 1 -4--- ---I- 0 i ---o ,I. 6 11 o o -------t-----"t -c) I 4 I 1 1 t 1 --(9 11 5 1.. 11 1 I 1 1 1 J __I-----1 1 i 'I 1 -MU 1 1------- 1 I 1, 10 1 0 I i I i 1---- f ------0 --0 L I I 1 I 1 n .h 1 P r r 11 111 H i 1 i 4 0 1 I -I ,,,7,, t----- 0 1 I _,)-4i I .....t i 1 1 File Number: GEOENGINEERS FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 2/23/12 (Thurs) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0715 FR -6 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1600 1 of 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Sunny, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor), Gary Holmquist with NPI, and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a f total of 15 piles, for a total of 68 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter rv continuous flight auger using leads '5 554148 attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler .�i i crane. All of the piles were completed by c` i ilk" m f 'V drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump 5 Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout f t pressure of 325 to 375 psi. During s .,,f grouting, the auger was withdrawn from x— the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 t seconds per foot, but the rate of a «k withdrawal was relatively constant for ,.z -.0 each pile. The grout head ranged from r 10 to 30 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 121 to 125 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 2 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text. table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 23, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an approximately 3 to 5 foot drop in grout level following installation due to fluctuating groundwater elevation. all 11 Crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation. a. T The rebar cage for pile AP66 was T �r s a i mistakenly set approximately 3' -3" too ,4,,,„, 1 high; it is our opinion that this will not rot substantially affect the capacity of this pile and is therefore acceptable. ar We observed crews from Bruch and Bruch to dig an approximately 12 foot deep excavation in order to place a M pump structure. Crews backfilled around the pump structure with crushed rock and compacted to grade with a hoe pack. Pile AP 41 was installed through the backfill at the end of the day. The excavation, pump structure and backfilling operations are shown in the photos to the right. The approximate excavation location is shown in the pile layout sheet. Based on my observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today ±`',PW have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. 1, o- „ii a ter. p}+ ci ':I u di 1, I, 1 .4; 1 Z 0 0 1 c 1 .5 -0 a 1- 0_ .9. T i) dc? T CO II IND i i 1 I CO CO 0 i 1 c c t Z, j C i C) tri 1 c 1 1 I T 1 i, CU CU 1 1 p 1 __i__ i 1, 1 _L. 1 10 .71 Q I ______4 -4 +1----0 1 1 1 0 0 i 1 -t---- d t" 43 ----4---- 1 1 4 1 _______4k__, II 1 ii i II. 0 0 11 1 0 1 11 1 12 I I, 11 i L 1°1 1 1' iliC)771 I 1 7:-° 1 $1,46* 11 I i I 1 71 ---e i 1 111 1 1 1 D —i.1 1 0 l 1 a I K i I I H .1 ___.1_ 0 1 4,1 3 11 1 1 i i I. E----- 4 2 g 0 0 E "F'1 NI: 5- I I 1 I I TT i I A t i 1 17 7 *---1 0- r° U CD- X _p 0 0 ......4,12_p____k_f__HH "4 0 i i I I /11-_l_ 1 1 i 1 1 6. II I t. m 1 1 1 -L---- I wii 1 0---il- c t 1 1 4 t ')4 11 i 1 1 ij 1 1- 1 I 1 11 0, 1 1 o i 1 1 11 1 i 1 11 a -ii -1 1 -41 11 it 71 71 1! 01 01 I 11 ,1 11 1 --o E t l 1---Ela i lb c. L_ r. 1 I, 10 0 4 -----t -1 -------a 1 1 "-11--0 i it 5 1.1 i 10 0 Li_ti 1 1 1 1 1 fl I 1 1 _M -'t I 1 1 U 1 --(3 1 10 01 i, 1 4 1 1 „---------CD —0 1 i 1 i tit--,—* E1+ 1 i ______4____"__I vi -111_ i 1 0 i: 0 N.11 1 II o i 1 I G i 1 1 ----------0 r r File Number: G EOENGINEERSZI FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 Project: Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 2/22/12 (Wed) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0715 FR Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1615 1 of 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Windy, times of sun and rain, 45 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor), Gary Holmquist with NPI, and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles t ;iiij� During my visit, the contractor installed a total .01 of 14 piles, for a total of 53 to date. Each of k, the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with taro' i 1 an 18 -inch diameter continuous fligdht auger 7: using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic), crawler crane. All of the piles were completed t ,1 by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium rY r' Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 1 to 400 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 10 seconds per foot, but the rate of t a withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 10 to 20 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 116 to 135 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. O THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 2 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 22, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an r r \►,p approximately 2 to 4 foot drop in grout i; j "f. level following installation due to r (i fluctuating groundwater elevation. l:; iR Crews poured these pile locations with I 1 additional grout to top of pile elevation. 1 ik,‘ :li The hydraulic power unit used to drive h''IL' r the auger exerienced a serpentine belt failure at a depth of 40 feet below +I� 4, 1 ground surface when attempting to drill Or' h pile AP49. Pile installation activities ,i 1" were halted for approximately two 4 hours while crews replaced the belt. 1 The auger was completely removed from the hole and the pile was redrilled to depth. The smoking power unit and resulting puddle of antifreeze beneath it are shown in the photos to the right. Based on my observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and r specifications. /4 r 1 r t2 Ch s T 1: _rn .....„..6) 0 ot a 5 G 44? 1 -c5 13 W To To "el. l• 4- .1- 0 1 19 1 c I 0.1 CV a C.) I I 1 I I I I —I-- I I, I I I 'I ll 0 1 111_11,_______ 1 1 4 w 1 --13 II i i i i i i 0 I 1 1 0 w_.-.-. t 1 I 1 1 0 0 —,..1 o I I A A i 1 '1 1 I I e i 1 o I I I 0 11 o 1 ei I i 1 1 "1 o .j 41_41-,__ l_s 1 i. 1 1 1 i i 1 31 3 t: 1 T 4 A T i P 0 2-----t- r LI_ i ,0 1 0 i 1 I q li i I I cl 41 li c 1 ,1 �I q c I Il t--------- o --o II i I o 1 1 ji A 1 e q -s_______ --_----0 h th I -1---- It o -t----t- F 1 I I! I ...1 11 '1 1 1 1 1 I 'i 1 4 i' 0 a;., ----1------------. J ---0 1 —F 1, L 1 1 —1, 0 1 I i '1 11 f_ -0 I I 0 o :_l i j W EU I i 1 --------i -43 1 10 1 01 1 II 1.1 1-- -------(7) O 1 1 1 1 11 J --4---1--111 pall u gi .i 1 1 1 1 -F --t-7.- 1 ea c 3, i ______e 0 1 d .1 I G-44 I 4 ,,,_t 1 ire' File Number: GEOENGINEERSS FIELD REPORT 19452 001 00 Project: Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 2/21/12 (Tue) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0715 FR -4 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1600 1 of 3 Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Partly Cloudy, 40 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor), Gary Holmquist with NPI, and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 15 piles, for a total of 39 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 to 400 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 15 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 5 to 35 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 116 to 138 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16 strokes per cubic yard of grout. i After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long riliM steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center r t bars were inserted into the holes We observed the pile contractor to remove s r an approximately 2' X 1' X 6" concrete block obstruction encountered at pile location AP39 at a depth of about 2 feet below u ground surface. Crews were able to remove the obstruction using a small excavator and continue installation of pile AP39. as re 1 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A prelimna report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 2 -21 -12 Observat ry and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comp wit the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include of supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for jo or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy t he ori ginal document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 21, 2012 Page 2 All piles installed today experienced an i app roximately 2 to 5 foot drop in grout” 4. a level following installation due to W fluctuating groundwater elevation. Crews poured these pile locations with v a dditional grout to top of pile elevation. The drop in grout level is shown in the photo to the right. Based on my observations, it is our nr „1 opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general t4 accordance with the project plans and f specifications. a Cogeneration Project 1 c T E 1 ;:n..-:„7fr•:.:;; .ej t :;,,.c:: '.1c. I 1 i 1 ------:'----11.-1--ti- 1 0 0 0 0 I t------t -4-- L-4- o ■3... 1 0 0 0 MI6 .-11 I —41,—, "I_ 41," 1 4,-L i t ,-----5?1, 7 1- I 7 I t TF I -2 I ril. g!Ki 4 I 9 i c'— -i' —1 _----i.---1.---1,----1---1.-- e)-- -7-t—t7-- f- F 'c)--4- I:I c-1 ='i 711_104: 1 I 1 -i-.--1---1------0 13,I 0 T 1 =:=1 Null 1 gil -------------IIIL:==--,==_*----==. ---.=.-t_ C 1 I 1 -d 1 .4 `4 I 1 1 A A A i 4- 1 I I .1 -,i 4 0 ---4=i, 43 I Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously File Number: GEOENGINEERS FIELD REPORT 19452 001 00 Project Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 2/20/12 (Mon) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner Time of Arrival: Report Number 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0700 FR -3 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 1600 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Partly Cloudy, 40 F 0.25 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed b PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing Y Y g video We visited the site to observe installation of augercast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor) and Paul with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 18 piles, for a total of 24 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 to 77 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 325 to 450 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 15 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 10 to 30 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from appro 114 to 129 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our discussions with DeWitt, the grout volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 16 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 foot center bars were inserted into the holes. We observed the pile contractor to remove an approximately 8' X 6.5' X 1' concrete block e 2t _z obstruction previously encountered at pile location AP23. The excavated obstruction is shown in the photo to the right. Crews were able to successfully install pile AP23 after the concrete block was removed. 3` All piles installed today experienced an ',eV' ,1 approximately 2 to 5 foot drop in grout level following installation due to fluctuating groundwater elevation. Crews poured these pile locations with additional grout to top of pile elevation. O THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 2 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. My conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 20, 2012 Page 2 The steel reinforcing cages used for the piles are shown in the photo below. box. al�� +w� a' l t W-4.4737,*....7:r$ V y ,,,,o °t r�'" Based on my observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. I II F Cogeneration Project r e"i gi ZI P I 8 C P' 0::r■ i 4' 1://i t' Sh 5 tf,9 I i 1 1 4 1: 5: 1 EE 1 1 I -F c_.. I {Hk-- 0 0 0 V-' 0 hmai..A• --4--, T-4-, 1 t --1---, 77-1—_L7 •i-J___!:_:,.-,sp1":____ if_bli--.-2H 1 r I 7 i I -1 I i I I 1' €31-1 J IIIIT N _,L7 L____ __L _2________.!r_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 7 -T, 4°1 T-t 4 I I imsmii I PD 1 1. II i ..d i i 1 1 —,---Hi. 17.1 1 1 1 tui 1 _1 1 _1 1 1 i —i I _1 1 0 4,1 11, 1 i T 7 I m 4 tr —1— i 1 -1 I o o 0 0 c 1 4 6_-_ L 1 1 1 3 0LEb—F-- 0 i _4 ----4------1--- 11---- 1k== --fl-z -kz-=---4=----*----- i 1 i a H 1 I I 1 j EMI 11 l'' I._ A .,4 -f-----L-1-=f 0 s-E- --41- 0 Piles Installed Today 0 Piles Installed Previously l File Number: GEOENGINEERS FIELD REPORT 19452 001 00 Project: Date: 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 2/17/12 (Mon) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner Time of Arrival: Report Number: 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0700 FR-3 L q I Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Erik Ventura Port Angeles, WA 0330 1 of 3 Purpose of visit Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Partly Cloudy, 40 F 4.0 hr Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or 0 Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable Safety Hazards Were Addressed by PPE Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe installation of auger cast piles for the Biomass Cogeneration Facility located at the Nippon Paper Plant in Port Angeles, WA. While on site we met with Gary Holmquist with NPI, Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor), and Paul and Garth with DeWitt (pile contractor). The pile layout sheet is attached for reference. Il 1 NIII6 i II �'�(l i rtit rt 'Vet VA 3, 7 .1 II 1 8: :',;*S 6".* 1 0 A, t'r Y i' 1 r f Augercast Piles During my visit, the contractor installed a total of 6 piles, for a total of 6 to date. Each of the piles was drilled to a depth of 75 feet with an 18 -inch diameter continuous flight auger using leads attached to a CX900 hydraulic crawler crane. All of the piles were completed by drilling the holes and filling them with structural grout using an Olinpump Millenium Series 3 pump, with a grout pressure of 350 to 400 psi. During grouting, the auger was withdrawn from the hole at a rate that varied from 5 to 15 seconds per foot, but the rate of withdrawal was relatively constant for each pile. The grout head ranged from 15 to 35 feet. The grout volumes for each of the piles varied from approximately 114 to 130 percent of the theoretical neat line volumes. Per our previous discussions with DeWitt, the gorut volumes were determined by counting the stroke counts, using 17 strokes per cubic yard of grout. After the auger was completely removed from each of the holes, the 40 -foot long steel reinforcing cages and 80 -foot center bars were inserted into the holes. O THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Erik Ventura 2 -17 -12 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. My conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 2 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: Pile Layout, Augercast Pile Field Data Sheet Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, DeWitt, File File No. 19452 001 -00 February 17, 2012 Page 2 The pile contractor initially encountered difficulty setting the rebar cage for pile AP100. The crew pulled the cage, then re- drilled and re- pumped the hole with wetter grout. According to Garth (Dewitt), about 15 gallons of water was added to the truck mix. The pile contractor also encountered an obstruction at about 5 feet below ground surface when attempting to drill pile AP23. Crews removed the auger from the hole and moved on to pile AP24. Drilling of pile AP24 was paused for approximately 5 minutes to free an auger collar that had become stuck on the leads, but the pile was successfully completed. Based on my observations, it is our opinion that the piles installed today have been installed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications. j Cogeneration Project T E -a- 1 of Nippon Paper Industries Al 0, 11 S:to -------t I 1 -4--4F- ---------0 o I 0 0 0 ._____7- 1 t _-_t -7-1-_,h- LL_.-__-F17 1 I I I 1 -I -ir —1: zE14 7 1 1 c) I 1 I I I I I 1 9.--t--- N _i_. J __!_1.7 1 L _0 s.._.,_: 1 !-ILL. 1 r 1 1 i f i e, i 1. 1 12M2 1 i '1 I I 1 I et 0- 4 i Q c i i I —I 1 I F __:J. T c o (I) i I 1 1 1 _L-i- i 0.-:-_-_:1=-__; ,--------t--4) 0 1 i c 0 1 1 I 1 4 I i 0=1 I I.= t -I I- .i- _S 1 I _i _i -4----'2-t±i —_-----,-rt---- -41 I 1 CI II 1 1 1 1 1 °--if-----7------ I 7 7 -L H Piles Installed Today Piles Installed Previously I r 1 File Number: GEOENGINEERSS O FIELD REPORT 19452- 001 -00 ..2 Project Date: O 600 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 Biomass Cogeneration Facility 1/13/12 (Mon) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Owner: Time of Arrival: Report Number 206.728.2674 Nippon Paper (NPI) 0905 FR -1 Prepared by: Location: Time of Departure: Page: Tim Bailey, PE Port Angeles, WA 1235 1 of 2 P Purpose of visit: Weather: Travel Time: Permit Number: Construction Observation Sunny, 40 F 4.0 hr i Upon arrival to the site I assessed personal safety hazards: Yes or Referred to Site Safety Plan and Safety Tailgate if applicable s Safety Hazards Were Addressed by Performing tool box safety meeting Other (describe): NPI Safety Briefing video We visited the site to observe overexcavation for the Hog Fuel Storage stucture. While on site we met with Gary Holmquist with NPI, Tim Davis with JH Kelly (contractor), and Shawn West with NTI (inspector). A detail of structure C7 foundation drawing 30 -S -046 is attached for reference. al i Overexcavation y When we arrived on site, the earthwork contractor (Bruch and Bruch) was beginning demolition and removal of the existing slab and ft /p1 pavement for the Hog Fuel Storage structure. rr SWCA was monitoring the excavation for r ,x archaeological purposes. Per our geotechnical report and per our previous discussions with NPI, w 1 00 the contractor was overexcavating this area to 2 f feet below foundation subgrade elevation (approxate Elevation 7'9 We observed that the soils being excavated from this area included several feet of fill and some thin lenses of peat. The soils at the base of overexcavation generally consisted of loose gray silty sand with occasional gravel and trace shells. We evaluated the base of the excavation with a 1 /2 inch diameter probe rod and typical probe Overexcavation along north edge of Hog Fuel Storage structure depths were 6 to 24 inches with moderate effort. Towards the end of the day, the groundwater level rose with the tide to approximately Elevation 7 feet, and we observed groundwater in areas of the excavation (see photo). We observed that the peat layers were present in some areas close to the base of the excavation. We recommended A. that if peat is encountered at the base of the excavation, the overexcacvation be locally increased to remove the peat. Since the additional overexcavation to remove peat will extend closer to the groundwater table, we recommended that I the contractor backfill these deeper areas with quarry spalls. Due to the weather, we understand that spells may not be available, in which case we concur with the use of 3 -inch minus concrete for this application. 0 THIS FIELD REPORT IS PRELIMINARY FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE A preliminary report is provided solely as evidence that field observation was performed. Tim Bailey, PE 1 Observations and /or conclusions and /or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from and shall take precedence over those indicated in a preliminary report. X THIS FIELD REPORT IS FINAL REVIEWED BY DATE A final report is an instrument of professional service. Any conclusions drawn from this report should be discussed with and evaluated by the professional involved. Tim Bailey, PE 1 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to our services only. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specification throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the work of others. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety of others on this project. DISCLAIMER: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and /or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Attachments: None Distribution: Nippon Paper, AMEC, JH Kelly, NTI, File I File No. 19452 001 -00 January 23, 2012 Page 2 We recommended that the contractor continue this approach for the entire Hog Fuel Storage area and backfill to foundation subgrade elevation with imported 1 -1/4 inch minus gravel borrow. We evaluated a stockpile of this material on site and visually confirmed that the material meets the recommendations presented in our geotechnical report. We recommended that the first 12 inches of fill be static rolled to avoid pulling groundwater up into the fill; if the contractor can coordinate fill compaction with low tides, this might help the process. We recommended that NTI complete several compaction tests per lift, with the target of 95 percent M DD. We recommend that this target be optional for the first 12 inches and mandatory for the last 12 inches of fill. Provided lower fill is static rolled to a firm condition per our recommendations and the upper fill is compacted to 95 percent of the MDD, it is our opinion that the compacted structural fill will perform acceptably for foundation support for the Hog Fuel Storage structure. If there are any questions regarding site conditions, please contact Tim Bailey at (206) 795 -4637 (cell phone). Schedule We understand that the augercast piles are tentatively scheduled to begin on Monday, February 13, pending revised drawings, approval of shop drawings, and rebar cage fabrication. GeoEngineers should be on site full -time for pile installation, so please contact Tim Bailey with any changes to the pile installation schedule. yr v Overexcavation completed, evaluated N r R in yellow highlighted areas, backfill `1 started in rrp,. 44 Day q`[ 91(Er Clay[ IM;RMwEST D- 166397-'JO-i -Ra3 �3� g „V....- 1 Alil ill Ell 4/1 11/ 'k r -mx 1.1 f 4:5 r 4 A. t .t 4 'ir y a A .E. n,r, Aqq t i y PATE GN i. 4 `i a Ark a rfrirCrt WC Cr ®'6420 er WO. i Y o s.` rurz 1 L t ua CON/[CT �PPCR LbafR t i l p Gam %p1E5 my r Y E..EVRICX) OH WO P CCNOLCTOR Vi/AE. rr WE NC FOR c1 1 I' at b y SCE ORO 6-30-(Sr-016 66 %Y” �r roe (oIEM41 a) a 8'• a sr -r nr. `'o. I C ii 1 I F i V% i1,I.' (spmrasa o D-t -30-.5-041 Detail from drawing 30 -S -046 w